seems to have combined the requests now. Hopefully we get closure soon. Riposte97 (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC) No worries, can't see any admin wanting...

editor in question an apology. It wasn't my intention to be a donkey. Riposte97 (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC) The apology you mailed me is not...

have previously disputed, there is now and RfC and an ANI thread titled "Riposte97: time sink". I think TB is mistaken about who edited the Kamloops article...

Thanks, RP97 Riposte97 (talk) 02:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)  Done. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Thank you Riposte97 (talk) 21:48...

RfC, or state why the rules do not apply to you. Riposte97 (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC) @Riposte97, editors have no responsibility to answer to you...

a new discussion, but will consider it over the next couple of days. Riposte97 (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC) You're welcome!—S Marshall T/C 08:37...

To my reading they do not, though granted, I am relatively new here. Riposte97 (talk) 04:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC) I have declined your second appeal...

Cheers for your help in archiving that absolute mess of a talk page. Riposte97 (talk) 22:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC) No problem, it's quite hard because...

policy? I don't actually have an issue with how the close was handled. Riposte97 (talk) 04:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Theres no reason to think a new discussion...

As it is, my hands are pretty full trying to undo the damage done by Riposte97 before he was topic banned and I literally have work that specifically...

is to engage in discussion on the talk page. You ought to know that. Riposte97 (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC) @LoomCreek Once again, please engage...

angels to self-revert the close, even if you cannot overturn the ban. Riposte97 (talk) 09:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC) You raise an interesting point, namely...