• Hello, Rigorimpossible, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and...
    48 KB (3,987 words) - 11:51, 27 March 2024
  • even know what a sock puppet is, I just wanted to remove vandalism on "rigor mortis" last night... This is bullshit, I go to repeal an auto IP ban and...
    1 KB (270 words) - 01:26, 19 July 2011
  • or movement, and subject to necessary academic or journalistic rigor- it is impossible to determine what, if any, material is suitable for inclusion in...
    8 KB (284 words) - 05:48, 22 April 2009
  • DSLR Talk page. Vbalsys (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Thanks. Rigorimpossible (talk) 10:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Hello, I reverted your revert on Template:DSLR...
    12 KB (799 words) - 04:16, 4 April 2023
  • it is that emphasis on extreme rigor often engenders sterility. We trust, of course, that our efforts to avoid rigor mortis has not brought us dangerously...
    9 KB (1,466 words) - 19:31, 23 January 2011
  • would elevate my talk page to article status and subject it to the usual rigors. That’s not to say sources do not exist, for indeed, this business of Wikipedia’s...
    11 KB (1,434 words) - 06:33, 6 March 2023
  • foray into social choice theory leaves me dissatisfied with the level of rigor and clarity in the field. From the point of view of not understanding the...
    10 KB (1,520 words) - 13:54, 24 November 2015
  • Thanks, Netherzone. I agree with your stance about Wikipedia's need for more rigor in rules. A significant portion of long-term contributors continue to take...
    43 KB (5,562 words) - 04:21, 16 November 2024
  • rigorous, positive contributions haven't you? I wasn't aware how much lack of rigor represents the RfA system on Wikipedia; it seems I am not the only person...
    24 KB (3,653 words) - 05:18, 21 February 2022
  • skipping the official protocol. Correcting them would be precisely an act of rigor. What is the effort to maintain information that is false? Why not, instead...
    13 KB (2,091 words) - 07:15, 12 October 2019
  • used to writing for other professional mathematicians, and they expect rigor. But in another sense this ought to be easy, because it's rare that we think...
    52 KB (6,026 words) - 03:00, 25 January 2024
  • seemingly rigorous, etc. But who do you ask "What is a number?" "What is rigor?" "What is logic?", etc? You ask analytic philosophers. In philosophy, we...
    30 KB (4,100 words) - 01:12, 4 March 2023
  • real proof. Similarly, when someone disbelieves, they're again lacking rigor, falling back on the words of those they trust instead of actually verifying...
    28 KB (4,051 words) - 20:13, 3 December 2017
  • this is not mundane nor a neutral edit it is clear - your assertions lack rigor - there are no assumptions from me, this is your own language. I am simply...
    96 KB (10,634 words) - 00:40, 13 November 2024
  • sincere in his actions and has helped reveal frauds and poor scientific rigor, but that his tabloid like tactics are unhelpful to those sincerely investigating...
    10 KB (1,596 words) - 11:26, 23 April 2007
  • articles. That means that every source has to be analysed to the highest of rigor to ensure reliability and verifiability. As per this discusser here references...
    19 KB (2,174 words) - 09:53, 6 March 2023
  • first looked at it, did not seem to be too particular about mathematical rigor, which is fine with me because I would go to such a page to get "the rough...
    76 KB (7,731 words) - 23:54, 28 January 2023
  • MaxDZ8 talk 07:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Hi, Can you please apply the same rigor and clean up the Interesting Stream Processors section on the [[2]] page...
    30 KB (4,168 words) - 00:33, 13 February 2023
  • historical linguist" was intended as a compliment to your intellectual rigor. I'm afraid my silly Australian sense of humour doesn't always carry in...
    23 KB (2,166 words) - 02:54, 5 January 2022
  • cats without documentation of age should not be on this list. However, the rigor of the documentation often is only a dated link to a news article that surmises...
    107 KB (15,277 words) - 20:34, 6 October 2024
  • strictly true. Purgy Purgatory's correction is, however. If math isn't about rigor, what is it about? Vincent (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC) You just...
    267 KB (33,820 words) - 17:26, 14 April 2023
  • but the redaction of the article in reference is so lousy and lacking rigor is appears to be unusable as such in a WP article. The authors ideas are...
    125 KB (15,411 words) - 09:42, 2 November 2024
  • reverse order)[<--sarcasm alert]. Maybe this apparently unnecessary naming rigor upon which I have been harping could cause a small paradigm shift that carries...
    208 KB (30,450 words) - 20:43, 7 July 2022
  • tend to become more specious, and later academic arguments increase in rigor--time treats different fields differently.) There are problems with translation...
    76 KB (8,286 words) - 05:45, 2 October 2024
  • something that makes that meets the same basic criteria for mathematical rigor that are required from any math student (2) the fact that, for reasons that...
    150 KB (22,607 words) - 00:50, 8 August 2024
  • pure and applied mathematics, and aesthetics 5 Notation, language, and rigor 6 Fields of mathematics 6.1 Foundations and philosophy 6.2 Pure mathematics...
    48 KB (7,252 words) - 05:57, 19 October 2012
  • concur with Elmidae. The model is at the moment just built on too little rigor and data to be appropriate for use. If you are having too much difficulty...
    69 KB (6,475 words) - 01:34, 29 November 2022
  • degree whatsoever and were definitely not limiting themselves to academic rigor. "uneducated" people were using lots of medicinal plants long before science...
    31 KB (3,818 words) - 20:43, 13 May 2022
  • detractors are silenced, and thus Wikipedia, intellectual honesty, and academic rigor are all tarnished by this lemmings-like mentality among many of the site's...
    566 KB (83,768 words) - 04:58, 16 August 2024
  • the nuances of interpretation in the Benchley passage, I appreciate your rigor and agree that it's best to err on the side of caution when it comes to...
    832 KB (99,468 words) - 20:31, 13 November 2024