Because of the ban on fancruft, pretty much every major fictional universe with a serious fanbase has its own Wiki. Every single Star Trek article links...
32 KB (4,323 words) - 16:42, 3 September 2024
Fair enough, but can you show me one place where the term fancruft is used in a non-pejorative sense? --Phil | Talk 12:40, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC) I've had...
30 KB (4,990 words) - 09:10, 29 May 2009
opposed to having many-layered articles on any fictional universe (called fancruft by others) in an encyclopedia of the real world. DavidH 04:28, July 12...
30 KB (4,872 words) - 04:35, 3 April 2022
Or on the Internet. Publish a book. Put up a website. Start a fan club. Fancruft is spam. How productive would it be to focus our energies on factual, useful...
32 KB (4,898 words) - 14:16, 4 February 2023
removal could have on our image ("Wikipedia doesn't want you to know it's a fancruft barn!"), but it might have a chance. Oh, and have I mentioned that one...
31 KB (5,115 words) - 09:11, 29 May 2009
2006 (UTC) Because the verifiability rule heavily impacts this fancruft. Much fancruft relates to games, TV shows, and the like, which are generally only...
30 KB (5,071 words) - 09:16, 29 May 2009
the subject, but I've thought about it rather a lot. Why do we put in "fancruft?" The first way to think about this is strictly from the point of view...
28 KB (4,839 words) - 15:31, 14 October 2013
Parts of this article were taken or adapted from Wikipedia:Fancruft. See that article's history for contributor information. Stifle 20:57, 17 January 2006...
14 KB (1,973 words) - 10:15, 5 March 2022
Who said this was fancruft? I am only attempting to mention the different ranks of Dalek. Yes, Dr. Who is famous here in England (My home country) and...
270 bytes (51 words) - 11:35, 7 July 2015
2006, and the article was unprotected, it gradually degenerated into the fancruft-filled mess it was before I started working on it. Prompted by a comment...
6 KB (901 words) - 00:09, 17 February 2010
This article (and all other articles that relate to a tour by Phish) can be considered fancruft 66.2.141.70 16:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)...
201 bytes (27 words) - 12:32, 26 September 2006
How many times must I say? This is NOT A FANCRUFT. I am merely attempting to dress all ranks of Dalek as well as their own storylines. I prefer to have...
431 bytes (82 words) - 18:58, 6 August 2015
Just a tip: a guideline using the phrase "self-serving fancruft" isn't off to a good start. Kafziel Talk 16:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Totally agree. It...
9 KB (1,408 words) - 11:48, 29 March 2022
get them to join our Task Force? We currently encourage people who add fancruft to go there, so why not encourage experienced players from there to come...
29 KB (3,367 words) - 13:10, 18 February 2023
all of the fancruft and lengthy details. Also, I dont believe that organizing these pages with the editors' convenience in removing fancruft in mind is...
141 KB (22,312 words) - 12:35, 11 April 2022
episode; that may be leaning to WP:FANCRUFT, which is an issue in many Philippine showbiz articles. The list itself is FANCRUFT to me, and multiple sources are...
6 KB (701 words) - 14:19, 2 November 2024
need for the Imperial Productions page to be deleted for none-noteable fancruft, for pages such as BF2Combat and Point of Existence would fall under the...
892 bytes (120 words) - 02:36, 14 October 2006
remain to be fancruft of the highest order. The suggestion is that all episode guides and individual episode articles should be deleted as fancruft, unless...
131 KB (21,380 words) - 14:53, 28 January 2023
them are wrestling fans who view WP as a blog/database for submitting fancruft materials. --Mann Mann (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC) I don't see...
11 KB (1,265 words) - 17:09, 2 November 2024
make it easyly accessible. I think it is, we'll get more regular help and fancruft is already removed from the article for the most part. The censorship section...
36 KB (5,297 words) - 13:41, 28 January 2023
buddy, keep that for the fancruft talkpage! Anyway, I hope you can deal with the fancruft (to me, that whole article is fancruft) over with those ones and...
26 KB (3,388 words) - 13:52, 28 January 2023
sections should be merged back into the main articles. There's just too much fancruft as it is. NotARealWord (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC) It has been...
73 KB (8,548 words) - 19:01, 15 April 2023
different problem. The two are at best indirectly linked (often through fancruft). See e.g. the 440 examples at Sobriquet#Examples. ◄ Sebastian 16:52, 6...
2 KB (245 words) - 16:50, 3 September 2024
references; see Episode_work) in conflict for instance with Wikipedia:Fancruft? As an example take the following edits of the article The Replacement:...
4 KB (521 words) - 20:03, 28 November 2019
used to contribute to the article, and I've been a fierce opponent of fancruft, but realize the article isn't so much about how to play the game as much...
5 KB (697 words) - 05:15, 4 February 2023
(which is speediable under CSD G3), badly translated material, hoaxes, or fancruft, unless the material is actually unsalvagably incoherent." I would have...
2 KB (314 words) - 01:45, 4 October 2005
(UTC) If the difference between Wikipedia's coverage of a topic verses a fancruft website is "more information, less graphically pleasing formatting", I...
13 KB (1,714 words) - 18:45, 2 November 2024
I refer you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fancruft#Policy_relating_to_fancruft . Tamtrible (talk) 16:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC) I also point...
9 KB (1,473 words) - 00:36, 14 April 2018
editors will shoot down nominations we make because it'll be thought of as fancruft. Therefore, we need to select a higher profile article that would hopefully...
6 KB (937 words) - 12:43, 12 July 2006
being up-to-date. It is likely that this article falls under the domain of fancruft. It likely only prove useful to readers of the webcomic. Searching Wikipedia...
2 KB (313 words) - 03:10, 5 June 2006