• Hello, 1403FAXAI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages...
    1 KB (122 words) - 05:11, 28 April 2021
  • main page http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEgoogle/SEgoogle2001/SE2017Aug21Tgoogle.html Espenak rewrote the definition of "greatest eclipse." He separated...
    27 KB (3,125 words) - 01:01, 23 March 2024
  • Thanks. --TimL (talk) 07:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Done, with an improvement to the eclipse year wikilink (see the eclipse season article). -- Glenn L (talk) 08:54...
    63 KB (7,996 words) - 17:36, 24 May 2024
  • Thanks for creating these solar eclipse pages - however, it looks like there have been a few cut and paste cock-ups. I am unsure what is correct info...
    67 KB (7,343 words) - 17:10, 22 March 2024
  • eclipse. If you want to discuss further, please do so on the Eclipse discussion page. — TimL • talk 12:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm Materialscientist...
    4 KB (406 words) - 18:43, 21 September 2021
  • Used Mitsubishi Eclipse The Mitsubishi Eclipse has been in production since 1989. A brand new or a used Mitsubishi Eclipse has been in the wish list of...
    2 KB (391 words) - 16:37, 18 October 2011
  • Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC) The article Black eclipse has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the...
    3 KB (443 words) - 21:06, 28 May 2007
  • --TimL (talk) 22:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC) Actually, what I said was that an eclipse has a 65% chance of being preceded OR followed by another eclipse. That...
    39 KB (5,689 words) - 03:47, 20 July 2021
  • adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Solar eclipse of May 10, 2013. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle...
    8 KB (67 words) - 21:43, 5 March 2023
  • regardless of my feelings towards you. --TimL (talk) 11:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC) You removed octaeteris from the Eclipse cycle page. Well, you commented it out...
    18 KB (2,611 words) - 17:35, 20 February 2023
  • Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eclipse. Your edits...
    3 KB (218 words) - 18:15, 29 January 2024
  • Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's...
    5 KB (355 words) - 11:34, 24 January 2022
  • Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eclipse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed...
    464 bytes (45 words) - 22:27, 15 June 2011
  • experienced editors. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 14:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC) Thank you for using the Articles...
    4 KB (469 words) - 02:06, 19 October 2013
  • let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Eclipse because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or...
    680 bytes (58 words) - 02:04, 18 April 2013
  • let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Solar eclipse of November 13, 2012, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia...
    811 bytes (77 words) - 05:25, 12 November 2012
  • the eclipse will be. In 2024, 14 Nicholas corresponds to 18 September. As this is just within the eclipse season there will be a small partial eclipse. This...
    54 KB (6,266 words) - 19:42, 29 September 2024
  • (T • C • L) 11:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Hello. This is a message to let you know that a subpage of your user page has been moved to User:Laocoon78/Eclipse (2000)...
    2 KB (248 words) - 20:34, 10 November 2019
  • have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Lunar eclipse. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and...
    937 bytes (101 words) - 01:34, 9 December 2010
  • Welcome! Hello, Nightside eclipse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are...
    10 KB (1,085 words) - 18:29, 13 August 2024
  • development machine with Eclipse Indigo, Apache Tomcat v6.0, MySql Server 2005 client and Internet Explorer installed and give the L&T Infotech development...
    4 KB (664 words) - 04:01, 19 September 2013
  • also get live chat help from experienced editors. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI) 13:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)...
    2 KB (153 words) - 13:37, 27 October 2012
  •  — TimL • talk 23:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC) A more appropriate place for the information on your user page would be the talk page for the Solar eclipse of...
    6 KB (580 words) - 21:40, 23 February 2023
  • inserting a link to your club into the Wikipedia article on the Mitsubishi Eclipse. Please note that this violates several Wikipedia policies, and it will...
    15 KB (2,371 words) - 21:31, 16 December 2023
  • helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 13:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)...
    1 KB (141 words) - 13:55, 19 July 2012
  • rubbish. I'll try to clean it a bit. Stuff like "Sporting an obsession", "Eclipse had developed a formidable reputation", "but now to a radical ensemble...
    10 KB (1,202 words) - 22:45, 15 March 2022
  • is very beautiful. --TimL (talk) 01:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC) I too did not know that the images were taken after the total eclipse has already ended. The...
    37 KB (4,498 words) - 18:20, 17 March 2022
  • Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Solar eclipse of November 13, 2012. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here...
    1 KB (143 words) - 07:21, 24 November 2011
  • The article February 1933 lunar eclipse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: The eclipse was too small to be of scientific...
    64 KB (5,605 words) - 10:05, 16 September 2024
  • Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eclipse may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry:...
    6 KB (491 words) - 16:05, 13 October 2014