The Claremont Profile Method is a method for classifying ancient manuscripts of the Bible. It was elaborated by Ernest Cadman Colwell and his students...
18 KB (1,956 words) - 14:21, 19 March 2021
infiltration by the Byzantine text.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), its text is mixed in Luke 1, Luke...
35 KB (3,619 words) - 06:34, 25 October 2023
the New Testament. This method usually is known as the Claremont Profile Method. This method was developed in part to provide a means of selecting Greek...
12 KB (920 words) - 14:51, 16 January 2024
it the following textual profile - 111 41/2 02 5s. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual...
8 KB (818 words) - 16:16, 12 March 2024
textual profile 1741 821/2 22 7s and placed it in Category V. It belongs to the textual family E, but according to the Claremont Profile Method in Gospel...
5 KB (442 words) - 03:07, 31 July 2023
text-type. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents mixed Byzantine text (mixture of Byzantine textual...
7 KB (699 words) - 19:32, 15 February 2021
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
5 KB (457 words) - 12:43, 31 December 2020
family Family Kx. It is close to Minuscule 54. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents Kx in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 it has mixture...
6 KB (588 words) - 02:00, 3 January 2021
placed it with some hesitation in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1. Currently it is dated...
3 KB (302 words) - 01:58, 2 January 2021
Category V. Its text is very close to the codex 480. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kr in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
7 KB (670 words) - 17:06, 17 March 2023
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11) is placed after John 21:25...
5 KB (385 words) - 19:25, 9 December 2021
to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kr in Luke 1 and Luke 20, and creates textual pair with 588. In Luke 10 no profile was made...
6 KB (508 words) - 22:02, 1 January 2021
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was dated by Gregory to the 11th or 12th century...
6 KB (539 words) - 03:56, 3 January 2021
New Testament manuscript classification system. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data) it has mixed Byzantine text...
7 KB (684 words) - 22:56, 28 July 2024
New Testament manuscript classification system. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 10. In Luke 1 it has mixed...
5 KB (499 words) - 08:45, 24 August 2024
the codex did not place in any Category. It was not examined by Claremont Profile Method. Gregory dated the manuscript to the 10th century. Currently the...
6 KB (440 words) - 03:37, 3 January 2021
derived from the 1516 edition of Erasmus. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. In 1 John 5:6 it has textual variant δι' ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος καὶ...
11 KB (1,204 words) - 11:26, 12 August 2024
text of the codex in any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The lacks the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11). F. H. A. Scrivener...
6 KB (503 words) - 01:37, 10 December 2021
as text K. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual Family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 14...
7 KB (608 words) - 20:51, 24 August 2022
place it in any category. It was not examined according to the Claremont Profile Method. It lacks the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11). In John 1:45...
8 KB (672 words) - 04:40, 30 September 2023
text of the codex did not place in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
6 KB (482 words) - 20:53, 15 February 2021
did not place it in any Category. It was not examined by using Claremont Profile Method. It lacks the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11). According to...
6 KB (451 words) - 12:09, 17 October 2023
Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. It was corrected...
7 KB (674 words) - 14:56, 19 January 2021
textual family I'. Aland placed it in Category III. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed text in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 the manuscript...
6 KB (494 words) - 06:23, 5 February 2021
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 1519 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
4 KB (326 words) - 01:18, 5 December 2023
Black it represents the Alexandrian text-type. According to the Claremont Profile Method in Luke 1; 10; 20 it is close to Codex Tischendorfianus III and...
6 KB (539 words) - 19:09, 9 December 2021
textual family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1 and represent the textual...
6 KB (503 words) - 02:24, 10 December 2021
the Greek text of the codex in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has a mixture of text-types in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
6 KB (497 words) - 16:58, 10 January 2021
textual family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1; Luke 10 and Luke...
6 KB (524 words) - 15:19, 16 January 2023
family Family Kr. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Family Kr in Luke 1, Luke 10, and...
7 KB (644 words) - 19:11, 9 January 2023