R v Cinous, 2002 SCC 29 is a 2002 case of the Supreme Court of Canada which held that in order for a defence to be presented to a jury, that defence must...

Lavoie v Canada [2002] 1 SCR 769; 2002 SCC 23 [29] R v Lamy [2002] 1 SCR 860; 2002 SCC 25 [30] R v Cinous [2002] 2 SCR 3; 2002 SCC 29 [31] R v Brown [2002]...

[2007] 1 S.C.R. 38, 2007 SCC 2 (majority) R v Trochym, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239, 2007 SCC 6 (dissent) Canada (AG) v Hislop, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 429, 2007 SCC...

2 S.C.R. 1069 R v Nygaard, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1074 R v Buttar, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1429 R v Shubley, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 3 Rawluk v Rawluk, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 70 (dissent)...

- Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v. Canada (Attorney General); White, Ottenheimer & Baker v. Canada (Attorney General); R. V. Fink". Archived from the original...