was nominated for extreme deletion. Record of this discussion may be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Extreme article deletion. Sadly, no points...
5 KB (566 words) - 05:39, 24 June 2024
for deletion/Votes for extreme deletion → Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Votes for extreme deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests...
7 KB (1,039 words) - 16:38, 28 September 2015
<grin> about that VfI header - the Extreme Deletion page was once nominated for deletion as a joke, so obviously the Extreme Inclusion page had to be nominated...
258 bytes (43 words) - 14:42, 4 March 2005
users placing this tag on an article cannot complete the deletion nomination and should leave detailed reasons for deletion on Talk:Francesco Banchini and...
13 KB (1,545 words) - 16:40, 2 November 2024
meet article-specific criteria if they had been created in articlespace. When should these talk pages be draftified instead of tagged for deletion? Helpful...
29 KB (3,502 words) - 12:18, 1 November 2024
VfD page, like this: article - see talk:article No opposition to deletion as of [date]. another article - see talk:another article Debate is raging! There...
90 KB (15,050 words) - 16:37, 2 October 2024
open a few more days. Regardless of the article, the afd did not result in a clear decision, although Extreme Unction currently is relisting. karmafist...
920 bytes (119 words) - 07:00, 15 October 2021
"this article's entry" link from [[wikipedia:Votes for deletion/ArticleX|this article's entry]] to [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/ArticleA and ArticleB|this...
30 KB (4,729 words) - 17:14, 1 October 2024
the Extreme Sports cat? Or should they still remain in both? --Churchill 11:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC) I was looking around for some X Games XII article to...
9 KB (1,135 words) - 13:21, 24 March 2023
Deleting the Homestead page is so extreme. I can understand making edits to the material, but to totally remove the article on the grounds that it might be...
1 KB (241 words) - 19:34, 4 August 2011
for deletion. After all, there is a Wikipedia article about Hitler, and he was not well liked, yet the article remains. That example is a bit extreme, I...
1 KB (195 words) - 20:11, 21 June 2006
better citations are needed, but the situation isn't extreme or dire enough to qualify it for deletion. The appropriate response, according to guidelines...
721 bytes (112 words) - 22:00, 27 November 2015
the Berkeley community since it's founding in 1933. Deletion of this page seems not only extreme, but unwarranted. Spokenbird (talk) 18:24, 6 September...
488 bytes (76 words) - 18:24, 6 September 2016
following for him, I don't see why the article should be deleted. Personally, I have friends who are extreme NIN fans, and I have heard his name brought...
763 bytes (138 words) - 14:54, 3 August 2006
Fortunately, I think, few people share that sentiment. I find extreme deletionism and extreme inclusionism to be equally untenable. --Ardonik.talk()* 03:52...
122 KB (19,166 words) - 14:53, 28 January 2023
here -- the answer is not deletion. Just give it time. -- phoebe / (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC) A one sentence "article" is almost invariably empty...
10 KB (1,482 words) - 19:29, 3 September 2024
meatpuppetry, sockpuppetry, etc... ? So that extreme (complexity) doesn't seem viable. On the other extreme (simplicity), "20 participants" can mislead...
102 KB (12,003 words) - 07:56, 20 September 2024
is basically a "delete without discussion", and, as such, is quite an extreme measure, and should only be used in limited cases where it is really required...
29 KB (4,149 words) - 20:32, 2 March 2023
Notability is too subjective for a speedy deletion criteria. I agree with dpbsmith that the most extreme sorts of non-notability are currently speedily...
108 KB (16,871 words) - 13:40, 4 February 2023
fair use image. Second, the statement "If in doubt, delete." is rather extreme. "If in doubt, ask others" seems a much more reasonable standard. -- Black...
166 KB (24,065 words) - 10:51, 19 June 2023
than is applying a redirect. And it's a heck of a lot less extreme than actual deletions, which occur all the time, sometimes with unfortunately little...
82 KB (12,634 words) - 11:30, 31 March 2022
here). On the other hand, less extreme examples such as editorials can often be instead edited into a decent article, for example by removing POV and...
173 KB (26,320 words) - 03:45, 10 March 2023
(UTC) See also Wikipedia:Extreme article deletion. —Korath (Talk) 00:44, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC) Also, Wikipedia:Extreme_article_inclusion. "Organic growth"...
168 KB (25,691 words) - 22:08, 21 July 2024
sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/06/17/BAGM0DA7LS1.DTL Retrieved 2011-12-11. "'We're living in extreme times that call for extreme measures,' said...
10 KB (1,378 words) - 01:07, 22 May 2022
criterion 5 for speedy deletion, "Reposted content that was deleted according to Wikipedia deletion policy". I wanted to list an article that's recently been...
89 KB (14,495 words) - 13:40, 4 February 2023
followed by closing admins. The rules state that unless an article fits the speedy deletion criteria, it should be listed here for 5 days after which an...
48 KB (7,309 words) - 05:29, 26 March 2023
Delete with extreme prejudice: The topic of the article is unencyclopedic, and likely to remain so for all time. Re-creation of the article (without being...
112 KB (16,610 words) - 12:05, 9 May 2022
have left a number of comments in the Discussion page for the article advocating for deletion, to which no one has made any follow up reply comments. However...
60 KB (9,348 words) - 13:47, 4 February 2023
cite with a slightly more extreme example, that case would never be allowed as justification to speedy delete the nigger article. No matter how offensive...
84 KB (12,230 words) - 20:28, 2 March 2023
got to be really extreme. In your case, I believe you're referring to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of tyrants. While the article may be considered...
135 KB (21,832 words) - 13:48, 4 February 2023