Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd (No 2) [1946] 1 All ER 512; [1951] Ch 286 is UK company law case concerning the issue of shares, and "fraud on the minority"...

accepted that the amendment was valid. He further considered Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286, where the relevant amendment was to remove a...

(1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701, changing the articles to allow a director to be removed before the end of his term was valid Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas...

Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd [1920] 2 Ch 124 Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951]...

secure a benefit at the expense of the company ...and see Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd for an example of what was not a fraud on the minority UK company...

Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead) [1927] 1 Ch 154 Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch...

nominal value of the shares (as seen in the later case of Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd). Lord Halsbury LC said the following. the Act of 1862... makes...

[1927] 1 Ch 154 Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286 [1919] 1 Ch 290 [1919] 1 Ch 290...

Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286 "Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co [1919] 1 ch 290". Oxbridge Notes...

and disparate impact on only one shareholder. This was so in Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd, where the articles were changed to remove all shareholders'...

and disparate impact on only one shareholder. This was so in Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd, where the articles were changed to remove all shareholders'...

v Pusser's Ltd [2007] 2 BCLC 483 Companies Act 2006 ss 629–633 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1946] 1 All ER 512 Cumbrian Newspapers Group Ltd v Cumberland...