• comment added by SWL36 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Hi, Batreeq. I have removed your excessively long quotation in Scientific foreknowledge...
    63 KB (7,218 words) - 21:21, 28 December 2023
  • and/or additional sources? Thank you! :) – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 23:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Hello @Batreeq: - The website IslamQA.info is neither reliable...
    13 KB (1,226 words) - 01:13, 20 November 2018
  • to Wikipedia, Narendra Saurabh! Thank you for your contributions. I am Batreeq and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions...
    1 KB (135 words) - 19:02, 21 July 2017
  • user:Batreeq has inserted footnotes to "explain" that many Muslims don't believe that Ahmadiyya Muslims are really Muslims. The claim is true in that...
    22 KB (2,859 words) - 18:53, 29 March 2019
  • consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 23:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)...
    4 KB (557 words) - 23:27, 30 September 2022
  • possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 03:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC) Hello GenoV84. You seem...
    7 KB (692 words) - 06:12, 19 November 2020
  • 2012–2016 March 15, 2012–June 1, 2016...
    121 bytes (8 words) - 23:45, 9 June 2017
  • Warning: Please be respectful when messaging me. Disrespectful messages are not tolerated and may be disregarded—kindness and civility is appreciated....
    546 bytes (72 words) - 02:22, 10 January 2018
  • clarify your statement regarding this (where is the talk page consensus?). – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 00:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC) The article was a redirect...
    34 KB (2,952 words) - 22:44, 6 March 2023
  • 0 bytes (0 words) - 19:41, 21 July 2017
  • "non-standard transcription" refers to in this edit reversion? Kind regards, – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 03:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC) Hi, please use one of the...
    98 KB (11,519 words) - 00:29, 28 November 2023
  • noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 23:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)  You are invited to join...
    52 KB (6,589 words) - 17:14, 25 September 2022
  • discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 02:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)...
    27 KB (3,401 words) - 03:16, 17 February 2023
  • June 2020 (UTC) In case you hadn't noticed, the change to PubChem which Batreeq had made was to change the file from .png to .svg; I merely sorted out...
    76 KB (7,450 words) - 02:51, 5 September 2020
  • to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 06:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks for uploading File:View...
    79 KB (10,187 words) - 02:22, 17 July 2023
  • prohibition. I cannot upload the image to Commons as it is non-free. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 23:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Read BLP. This is someone...
    138 KB (14,202 words) - 18:58, 5 October 2021
  • 24 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batreeq (talk • contribs) @Batreeq: I did notice that tag. The purpose of it is to warn people...
    76 KB (10,191 words) - 19:00, 12 February 2023
  • to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 00:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC) Hey, there. I'm just letting...
    70 KB (5,055 words) - 14:41, 4 March 2024
  • possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 06:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC) You have been blocked from...
    74 KB (7,227 words) - 07:27, 12 September 2023
  • (Contribs) 02:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batreeq (talk • contribs) Sorry for the poke, but in my watchlist it says you deleted...
    101 KB (12,595 words) - 18:00, 25 February 2023
  • the Anti-harassment tools team. Thank you for reviewing NGC 479. :) – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 20:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC) I messed up all my dates...
    249 KB (27,779 words) - 04:01, 29 January 2023
  • Can you please explain? And can I re-add it to the article? Thanks. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 21:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC) That image is known as a...
    117 KB (16,989 words) - 03:21, 6 March 2023
  • not have had to do so if I wasn't ignored – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 03:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC) Batreeq, I think you were awaiting a response from Courcelles...
    199 KB (25,750 words) - 05:48, 12 July 2023
  • ~Anachronist (talk) 01:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC) Yesterday i answered to Batreeq on the article's talk page, but he didn't respond. Instead, a few hours...
    103 KB (14,075 words) - 17:10, 15 May 2022
  • See Wikipedia:Administrative action review#Review of concerning block. – Batreeq (Talk) (Contribs) 04:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC) Just letting you know about...
    203 KB (16,586 words) - 12:42, 22 August 2023