The Claremont Profile Method is a method for classifying ancient manuscripts of the Bible. It was elaborated by Ernest Cadman Colwell and his students...
18 KB (1,956 words) - 14:21, 19 March 2021
infiltration by the Byzantine text.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), its text is mixed in Luke 1, Luke...
35 KB (3,619 words) - 06:34, 25 October 2023
Family Π (section Group profile)
1571, 1627, 1690, 1699, and 2463. According to the Claremont Profile Method group Π has following profile in Luke 1, 10, and 20:: 95 Luke 1:2 (1 reading)...
8 KB (730 words) - 09:31, 22 September 2024
——— (2003). "A Comparison Between the Text und Textwert and the Claremont Profile Method Analyses of Manuscripts in the Gospel of Luke". New Testament Studies...
10 KB (973 words) - 22:55, 26 September 2024
it the following textual profile - 111 41/2 02 5s. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual...
8 KB (818 words) - 16:16, 12 March 2024
Aland did not place it in any Category. It was not examined by Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript once belonged to the collection of J. D. Carlyle...
6 KB (525 words) - 20:56, 9 December 2021
the New Testament. This method usually is known as the Claremont Profile Method. This method was developed in part to provide a means of selecting Greek...
12 KB (920 words) - 14:51, 16 January 2024
placed it with some hesitation in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1. Currently it is dated...
3 KB (302 words) - 01:58, 2 January 2021
Black it represents the Alexandrian text-type. According to the Claremont Profile Method in Luke 1; 10; 20 it is close to Codex Tischendorfianus III and...
6 KB (539 words) - 19:09, 9 December 2021
derived from the 1516 edition of Erasmus. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. In 1 John 5:6 it has textual variant δι' ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος καὶ...
11 KB (1,204 words) - 11:26, 12 August 2024
considered a member of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the Alexandrian text in Luke 1 and Kx in Luke 10...
13 KB (1,139 words) - 16:58, 3 March 2024
Textually it is close to the codex 273. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it represents Kx in Luke 10 and...
9 KB (835 words) - 09:30, 2 September 2022
codex did not place in any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was examined by Pasino, Scholz, and Burgon. It...
6 KB (583 words) - 19:40, 9 December 2021
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
7 KB (694 words) - 08:34, 28 September 2024
Iκ (Family Π). Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 10 and Luke 20. In...
7 KB (690 words) - 08:34, 28 September 2024
place it in any category. It was not examined according to the Claremont Profile Method. It lacks the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11). In John 1:45...
8 KB (672 words) - 04:40, 30 September 2023
placed the Greek text of the codex in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 10. In Luke...
6 KB (551 words) - 05:17, 26 December 2020
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
5 KB (457 words) - 12:43, 31 December 2020
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was added to the list of New Testament manuscripts...
5 KB (442 words) - 19:37, 9 December 2021
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. It contains the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11) but with questionable...
6 KB (492 words) - 18:59, 9 December 2021
in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. The manuscript was examined...
5 KB (439 words) - 19:17, 9 December 2021
textual profile 1741 821/2 22 7s and placed it in Category V. It belongs to the textual family E, but according to the Claremont Profile Method in Gospel...
5 KB (442 words) - 03:07, 31 July 2023
textual family I'. Aland placed it in Category III. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed text in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 the manuscript...
6 KB (494 words) - 06:23, 5 February 2021
(along with codices 157, 235, 245, 291, 1012). According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents mixed text in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 it has...
8 KB (753 words) - 19:11, 9 January 2023
the Greek text of the codex in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has a mixture of text-types in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
6 KB (497 words) - 16:58, 10 January 2021
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. Scrivener and Gregory dated it to the 14th century. The manuscript...
5 KB (351 words) - 19:49, 9 December 2021
Category V. Its text is very close to the codex 480. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kr in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
7 KB (670 words) - 17:06, 17 March 2023
New Testament manuscript classification system. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data) it has mixed Byzantine text...
7 KB (684 words) - 22:56, 28 July 2024
textual profile 1761 871/2 42 21s and placed it in Category V. Hermann von Soden classified it to the family Ki, but according to the Claremont Profile Method...
7 KB (710 words) - 18:52, 24 March 2023
as a tertiary witness to the Caesarean type. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the Alexandrian text-type as a core member. List...
2 KB (112 words) - 17:52, 14 August 2017