Welcome! Hello, Roentgenium111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some...

cabins were semi-transparent, apparently, further reducing secrecy.) --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC) If voting cabins were semi-transparent...

though even this is not really necessary given how short the list is.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC) I must say, Urhixidur, I don't see...

you have your calculations still ready, it would be nice if you corrected the values accordingly.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)...

should keep them as "Unknown chemical properties" as the default case. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC) If you don't answer, I will revert...

as I can see. Could you add your sources to the article? Thanks! --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC) I'd appreciate a reply. If you...

coloured blue since 1 July. (See discussion at the image's talk page.) --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Please, could you fix the color of Panamá...

archive page to which they are claimed to be moved contains no threads. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC) Hi, ClueBot II hasn't been clearing...

article was best after your first revert (to the version of Heshy613).--Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Yes, you’re right. I now notice...

limit to 173. Anyway, I think the 128 claim is noteworthy to add. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC) Yes, sorry, it was 173. But maybe...

whole of this short section as it stands… as I said previously (on Roentgenium111's talk page ) "I think drawing attention to the fact that the population...

one or did you "accidentally" revert them together with the others? --Roentgenium111 (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC) PS: If you were referring to my edits...

upward. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Hello Interchange88; Roentgenium111 has noticed that your diagram for 10199 Chariklo is off by a factor...

change one of your keep !votes to a comment. On an unrelated note, Roentgenium111 asked you a question here and I'd appreciate it if you'd respond. Since...

it gives the higher one. Maybe we should find a better reference. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC) The Spitzer Space Telescope shows...

removing the "false Syrians" claim again. I suppose this was unintended? --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Definitely was, I should've scrolled...

There is a catch, though. I was scrolling around and found out that Roentgenium111 is going to change back ANYTHING to an ionless state. We need better...

"self reference" for it on 7 April and removed my tag.) Greetings, Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC) If you think it needs a [citation...

Burzuchius (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC) It was raised by User:Roentgenium111 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements/Archive 12#Naturally occurring...

for this claim? Otherwise it should be re-tagged as unreferenced. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC) Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration...

reverted by two editors: Roentgenium111 with a reason and by Nergaal without a reason. The reason for the reversion given by Roentgenium111 is as follows: ("correct...

a typo? --Roentgenium111 (talk) 11:26, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Yes. Fixed. r.e.b. (talk) 14:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Thank you. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:22...

the thread I started. Thanks for updating the article, in any case! --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC) News and notes: Commons milestone;...

know, the term asteroid has never been formally defined by the IAU.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 22:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC) I have noticed you have changed...

DP's", neither DP-ness nor size is determined by magnitude alone.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC) So what would be the added value...