The Claremont Profile Method is a method for classifying ancient manuscripts of the Bible. It was elaborated by Ernest Cadman Colwell and his students...
18 KB (1,956 words) - 14:21, 19 March 2021
the New Testament. This method usually is known as the Claremont Profile Method. This method was developed in part to provide a means of selecting Greek...
12 KB (920 words) - 14:51, 16 January 2024
infiltration by the Byzantine text.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), its text is mixed in Luke 1, Luke...
35 KB (3,619 words) - 06:34, 25 October 2023
contains many remarkable readings of an early type. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the Alexandrian text-type in Luke 1, 10 and 20 as...
12 KB (1,169 words) - 14:13, 20 July 2024
Textually it is close to the codex 273. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it represents Kx in Luke 10 and...
9 KB (835 words) - 09:30, 2 September 2022
from other sources as yet unidentified.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method, it represents textual family ƒ13 (the Ferrar Family) in Luke 1...
8 KB (860 words) - 19:24, 5 January 2024
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 1519 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
4 KB (326 words) - 01:18, 5 December 2023
placed it with some hesitation in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1. Currently it is dated...
3 KB (302 words) - 01:58, 2 January 2021
place it in any category. It was not examined according to the Claremont Profile Method. It lacks the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11). In John 1:45...
8 KB (672 words) - 04:40, 30 September 2023
Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by using the Claremont Profile Method. The text of the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11) is omitted...
6 KB (563 words) - 23:20, 1 February 2022
Black it represents the Alexandrian text-type. According to the Claremont Profile Method in Luke 1; 10; 20 it is close to Codex Tischendorfianus III and...
6 KB (539 words) - 19:09, 9 December 2021
predominantly Byzantine text.": 336 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it has a mixed Byzantine text in...
17 KB (1,955 words) - 12:29, 19 July 2024
Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. At the end of...
6 KB (571 words) - 19:54, 2 January 2021
Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Πb in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. The codex now...
3 KB (234 words) - 15:46, 25 June 2021
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it textual cluster along with the manuscripts 267, 1651, and 1654...
6 KB (520 words) - 23:10, 1 February 2022
it the following textual profile - 111 41/2 02 5s. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual...
8 KB (818 words) - 16:16, 12 March 2024
it to the K1. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1, in Luke 10 it has...
4 KB (360 words) - 22:40, 23 April 2024
of the codex placed in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. Robert Devreesse suggested ("Chaînes Exégétiques Grecques," Dictionnaire...
6 KB (456 words) - 00:19, 21 September 2021
——— (2003). "A Comparison Between the Text und Textwert and the Claremont Profile Method Analyses of Manuscripts in the Gospel of Luke". New Testament Studies...
10 KB (973 words) - 06:30, 17 January 2024
textual family I'. Aland placed it in Category III. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed text in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 the manuscript...
6 KB (494 words) - 06:23, 5 February 2021
derived from the 1516 edition of Erasmus. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. In 1 John 5:6 it has textual variant δι' ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος καὶ...
10 KB (1,071 words) - 19:15, 30 January 2024
text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. It contains the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11) but with questionable...
6 KB (492 words) - 18:59, 9 December 2021
Aland did not place it in any of his Categories. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Π171 in Luke 1 and Luke 10. In...
5 KB (383 words) - 00:42, 7 August 2023
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
7 KB (694 words) - 14:47, 27 December 2022
textual family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represent the textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
6 KB (537 words) - 01:45, 10 December 2021
text of the codex did not place in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke...
5 KB (459 words) - 15:48, 2 January 2021
According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Family Kr in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. In Matthew...
9 KB (811 words) - 17:25, 25 October 2023
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method in Luke 20 it has mixed text. According to Scrivener the codex...
7 KB (735 words) - 19:59, 17 March 2023
the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data) it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made...
8 KB (769 words) - 20:55, 13 November 2023
Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual family Kr in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. It belongs to...
5 KB (466 words) - 19:16, 9 December 2021