The Claremont Profile Method is a method for classifying ancient manuscripts of the Bible. It was elaborated by Ernest Cadman Colwell and his students...
18 KB (1,956 words) - 14:21, 19 March 2021
the New Testament. This method usually is known as the Claremont Profile Method. This method was developed in part to provide a means of selecting Greek...
12 KB (920 words) - 14:51, 16 January 2024
it the following textual profile - 111 41/2 02 5s. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual...
8 KB (818 words) - 16:16, 12 March 2024
infiltration by the Byzantine text.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), its text is mixed in Luke 1, Luke...
35 KB (3,619 words) - 06:34, 25 October 2023
predominantly Byzantine text.": 336 It was not examined using the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was likely written in Constantinople, in the 3rd...
9 KB (903 words) - 09:25, 30 June 2024
derived from the 1516 edition of Erasmus. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. In 1 John 5:6 it has textual variant δι' ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος καὶ...
10 KB (1,071 words) - 19:15, 30 January 2024
family K1. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
7 KB (680 words) - 12:58, 30 November 2022
Textually it is close to the codex 273. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it represents Kx in Luke 10 and...
9 KB (835 words) - 09:30, 2 September 2022
as a tertiary witness to the Caesarean type. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the Alexandrian text-type as a core member. List...
2 KB (112 words) - 17:52, 14 August 2017
predominantly Byzantine text.": 336 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it has a mixed Byzantine text in...
16 KB (1,906 words) - 09:30, 30 June 2024
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
5 KB (457 words) - 12:43, 31 December 2020
textual family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
6 KB (507 words) - 17:20, 1 January 2021
Black it represents the Alexandrian text-type. According to the Claremont Profile Method in Luke 1; 10; 20 it is close to Codex Tischendorfianus III and...
6 KB (539 words) - 19:09, 9 December 2021
Aland placed it in Category V. It was not examined by using the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript once belonged to Cardinal Bessarion (as codices...
5 KB (412 words) - 19:43, 9 December 2021
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 1519 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
4 KB (326 words) - 01:18, 5 December 2023
textual family I'. Aland placed it in Category III. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed text in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 the manuscript...
6 KB (494 words) - 06:23, 5 February 2021
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
5 KB (441 words) - 19:08, 9 December 2021
It was confirmed by the Claremont Profile Method. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents Kr in Luke 1...
6 KB (556 words) - 21:35, 25 December 2020
text-type. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents mixed Byzantine text (mixture of Byzantine textual...
7 KB (699 words) - 19:32, 15 February 2021
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 585 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
7 KB (629 words) - 07:03, 3 January 2021
——— (2003). "A Comparison Between the Text und Textwert and the Claremont Profile Method Analyses of Manuscripts in the Gospel of Luke". New Testament Studies...
10 KB (973 words) - 06:30, 17 January 2024
together constitute a sub-group within this family. According to the Claremont Profile Method 118 is a core of Family 1. C. R. Gregory dated it to the 13th-century...
7 KB (681 words) - 19:00, 7 January 2023
place its text in any Category. It was not examined by using the Claremont Profile Method. Matthew 1:11 It reads Ιωσιας δε εγεννησεν τον Ιωακειμ, Ιωακειμ...
6 KB (478 words) - 19:28, 9 December 2021
the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual family Kx in Luke 1 and Luke 20, and belongs to the textual cluster 74. In Luke 10 no profile was...
7 KB (574 words) - 19:50, 9 December 2021
textual profile 1741 821/2 22 7s and placed it in Category V. It belongs to the textual family E, but according to the Claremont Profile Method in Gospel...
5 KB (442 words) - 03:07, 31 July 2023
readings. Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 20, mixed Byzantine text...
6 KB (553 words) - 16:38, 25 December 2020
Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 291 in Luke 1. In Luke 10 and Luke 20 no profile was made. According to...
5 KB (387 words) - 19:07, 9 December 2021
family 1 manuscripts.: 77, 83 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it represents Family 1 in Luke...
18 KB (1,902 words) - 19:32, 5 January 2024
47. Aland placed it in Category I. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was written in the 13th century in Messina. The...
4 KB (330 words) - 13:04, 19 August 2020
Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1; in Luke 10 and Luke 20 no profile was made. The text of...
6 KB (502 words) - 19:05, 9 December 2021