In mechanism design, a strategyproof (SP) mechanism is a game form in which each player has a weakly-dominant strategy, so that no player can gain by...
14 KB (2,611 words) - 23:19, 2 July 2024
tie-breaking rule, it might become non-strategyproof. Cardinality-strategyproofness and inclusion-strategyproofness are satisfied by utilitarian approval...
22 KB (2,622 words) - 02:13, 18 July 2024
condition "sharing incentive"). Strategyproofness: a user cannot get a larger allocation by lying about his needs. Strategyproofness is important, as evidence...
7 KB (1,068 words) - 21:30, 14 March 2024
Again, one can define DD-strategyproofness, BD-strategyproofness, SD-strategyproofness and PC-strategyproofness. Participation - abstaining from participation...
12 KB (1,658 words) - 01:59, 8 August 2024
two outcomes a voter prefers, not how much. This can be replaced by strategyproofness, i.e. every person's dominant strategy is to honestly disclose their...
20 KB (2,099 words) - 21:35, 16 August 2024
otherwise-favorable result. The criterion can also be described as a weaker form of strategyproofness: while it is impossible for honesty to always be the perfect strategy...
22 KB (2,070 words) - 05:37, 16 August 2024
anonymity, strategyproofness and proportionality among all symmetric single-peaked preferences.: Prop.1 UPM is the only rule satisfying strategyproofness and...
29 KB (3,970 words) - 00:44, 27 August 2024
the standard notion of strategyproofness, as Allan Gibbard has shown that only random dictatorships can satisfy strategyproofness and ex post efficiency...
10 KB (1,254 words) - 06:07, 28 July 2024
Monotonicity (mechanism design) Preference revelation[disambiguation needed] Strategyproofness Vazirani, Vijay V.; Nisan, Noam; Roughgarden, Tim; Tardos, Éva (2007)...
4 KB (492 words) - 23:31, 25 July 2024
Median voting rule (section Proof of strategyproofness)
anonymous and strategyproof for all single-peaked preferences if it is equivalent to a median rule with at most n+1 phantoms. A rule is strategyproof for all...
15 KB (2,207 words) - 21:25, 2 July 2024
{\displaystyle i} and some valuation vector v − i {\displaystyle v_{-i}} . Strategyproofness means that an agent with real valuation v i {\displaystyle v_{i}}...
7 KB (1,219 words) - 23:24, 2 July 2024
lottery does not discriminate in advance between different voters. Strategyproofness: any false report by an agent results in an outcome that is weakly...
13 KB (1,717 words) - 15:57, 3 August 2024
preferences (where the median rule is strategyproof) and dichotomous preferences (where approval or score voting are strategyproof). With large electoral districts...
58 KB (6,705 words) - 18:01, 24 August 2024
rule satisfying non-imposition (every alternative can be chosen) and strategyproofness when there are more than two candidates is the dictatorship mechanism...
27 KB (3,032 words) - 06:52, 27 August 2024
characterization of domain restrictions admitting a nondictatorial and strategyproof social welfare function. These correspond to preferences for which there...
81 KB (7,446 words) - 01:57, 28 August 2024
routing problems, this mechanism is not only strategyproof, but also the minimum among all strategyproof mechanisms. In the case of network flows, unicast...
13 KB (2,217 words) - 23:23, 28 June 2024
best defends her opinions. We then say that approval voting is not strategyproof: once the voter has identified her own preferences, she does not have...
11 KB (1,740 words) - 19:43, 9 August 2024
preferences. For a voter with dichotomous preferences, approval is strategyproof. When all voters have dichotomous preferences and vote the sincere,...
58 KB (5,962 words) - 01:32, 28 August 2024
independence of irrelevant alternatives. Gibbard's theorem shows that any strategyproof game form (i.e. one with a dominant strategy) with more than two outcomes...
29 KB (3,909 words) - 08:17, 2 August 2024
tied vote, assuming some selected voter has expressed a preference. Strategyproofness: there is never any advantage to tactical voting. Failed criteria...
4 KB (483 words) - 22:16, 25 July 2024
019. ISSN 0377-2217. Peters, Dominik (2021). "Proportionality and Strategyproofness in Multiwinner Elections". arXiv:2104.08594 [cs.GT]. Brandl, Florian;...
29 KB (3,558 words) - 15:26, 22 December 2023
S a higher utility. Core-FS implies Group-FS. Several variants of strategyproofness (SP) have been studied for voting rules: Individual-SP means that...
25 KB (3,299 words) - 11:35, 19 July 2024
there is no PB rule that satisfies the following three properties: strategyproofness, efficiency, and positivity (- at least one approved project of each...
19 KB (2,599 words) - 16:39, 22 May 2024
preference aggregation. Chpora, Ghose and Meyer relate belief-merging to strategyproofness. They show that the Arrow's impossibility theorem and Gibbard–Satterthwaite...
17 KB (1,921 words) - 08:29, 17 May 2024
benefit from redistributing its ui among its members (this is a kind of strategyproofness axiom). Additivity - for each agent i, the allocation to i is a linear...
4 KB (521 words) - 13:12, 21 September 2023
accepted distribution c*. They define a new concept called level-strategyproofness (Level-SP), which is relevant when society's decision is based on...
21 KB (2,521 words) - 16:14, 19 February 2024
true valuations. They are not strategyproof - a partner can gain by reporting false valuations. Indeed, strategyproofness is incompatible with envy-freeness:...
40 KB (6,082 words) - 02:45, 17 August 2024
mistakes. An additional requirement is that the fair division procedure be strategyproof, i.e. it should be a dominant strategy for the participants to report...
19 KB (2,976 words) - 01:57, 8 August 2024
that extends RD (which includes RSD) satisfies both efficiency and strategyproofness. The page on fair random assignment compares RSD to other procedures...
7 KB (952 words) - 11:50, 26 March 2023
example, envy-freeness (EF) - no agent should envy another agent. Strategyproofness (SP) - each agent has an incentive to report his/her true preferences...
13 KB (1,778 words) - 03:10, 6 July 2024