reason) my brain decided to extand that to the other ones without checking. Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC) I've already reverted several of your...

is verifiable, and not based on the inferences of an individual user. Fm3dici97 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC) I understand what you are saying but...

involved. Thank you. Fm3dici97 (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Here's a link to the specific thread on the noticeboard Fm3dici97 references: Wikipedia:Administrators'...

meaning that a party didn't win any seat, why reverting that as well? Fm3dici97 (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Recounts are unlikely to change the...

helping hand but not if that means double checking every new edit. Thanks. Fm3dici97 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Abdullah1099 less than 24h after this...

pages present unconsistent figures and I'd like to avoid that. Thanks, Fm3dici97 (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC) It should be a matter of a talk thread...

so far (oddly) and yet you've already modified all the related pages. Fm3dici97 (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC) Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration...

they're accurate and if it's worth to replace the existing ones. Thanks. Fm3dici97 (talk) 08:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for your work on the table...

way was for sure more efficient and precise.--Fm3dici97 (talk) 06:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC) @Fm3dici97: Always best to build some checks into calculations...

preferences without giving further explanations or feedbacks is not the best. Fm3dici97 (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Hello. The reasons I reverted the...