Moved to: Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view...
51 bytes (8 words) - 17:40, 30 October 2005
context of reliable sources. This policy is the place to explain what is the neutral point of view. It is not the place to emphasize the complex notion of reliable...
343 KB (47,831 words) - 23:37, 29 July 2024
concept of a neutral point of view should be based on the collective equality of USERS of wikipedia. "Speciesism" is, at best, a fringe point of view and...
80 KB (12,461 words) - 23:50, 15 December 2023
Out of curiosity, isn’t a Neutral Point of View policy technically flawed since no perspective can be neutral? I mean, the very meaning of a ‘point of view’...
73 KB (11,323 words) - 14:58, 10 December 2021
labeled "neutral point of view as applied to science" states: 1a) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant...
209 KB (32,197 words) - 16:21, 4 February 2023
This page contains an alpha version of paragraphs or/and sections of the Neutral Point of View policy. It should be edited as if it was the policy. In...
4 KB (625 words) - 08:15, 1 May 2008
are overplaying the point somewhat - see my comments on what "a neutral point of view" really means in the section directly below, jguk 12:45, 25 January...
55 KB (8,902 words) - 14:04, 11 October 2008
wishes of the community, this discussion has been moved to User_talk:-Lumière#Discussion about the Undue weight section of Neutral point of view FeloniousMonk...
51 KB (7,724 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
interpretation. It is clear that the criteria of the Undue weight section need to be interpreted in view of specific situations. Moreover, in practice,...
22 KB (3,683 words) - 14:14, 13 June 2006
here to post a question to the Neutral point of view noticeboard When starting a new topic, please add it to the bottom of this page, and please sign your...
12 KB (1,546 words) - 17:51, 27 July 2024
that we do. Perhaps it is time that we propose another name than Neutral Point Of View, but not a name that is so vague as to include all content policies...
8 KB (1,295 words) - 10:09, 1 February 2006
(UTC) The paragraph you cite is an essay extolling the merits of having a neutral point of view policy. I agree it is a fairly poor one and we could do without...
43 KB (7,212 words) - 14:11, 13 June 2006
they believe Wikipedia should adopt a "scientific point of view" rather than a "neutral point of view." However, it has not been established that there...
44 KB (7,334 words) - 12:30, 18 July 2021
neutral point of view to the reader. There are two definitions of "publish" being kicked about at Reliable Sources, these conflicting points of view have...
38 KB (5,950 words) - 21:40, 18 February 2023
The neutral point of view is a point of view. It is just the consensus point of view. Otherwise the term would instead be the non-point of view. It is...
23 KB (3,640 words) - 14:09, 13 June 2006
(UTC) I have killed off the redirect for Neutral point of view, which pointed to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. NPOV should really get it's own article...
49 KB (7,946 words) - 21:17, 12 October 2010
neutral point of view an oxymoron. It is a point of view in it's self. --Greyfox Read the section of this article titled "What is the neutral point of...
28 KB (4,519 words) - 14:08, 13 June 2006
with a neutral point of view on the meaning of life?", but you wrote the equivalent of "Can you write an article with a non neutral point of view on the...
18 KB (2,817 words) - 14:11, 13 June 2006
found mentions at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Common_objections_and_clarifications and Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Writing_for_the_.22enemy...
257 KB (37,317 words) - 16:13, 9 October 2021
written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This is further clarified as all significant points of view are presented...
110 KB (16,828 words) - 23:56, 14 March 2023
express a point of view, in which case a neutral point of view (NPOV), has a slightly different meaning. For example: An article on cosmology (study of the...
6 KB (841 words) - 03:39, 20 January 2023
the article: "The presence of articles written from an exclusively United States point of view is merely a reflection of the fact that there are many...
39 KB (6,182 words) - 18:59, 7 July 2006
2017 (UTC) What would the opposite of this be? Wikipedia:Non-neutral point of view or Wikipedia:Biased point of view or something else? ScratchMarshall...
80 KB (11,670 words) - 18:46, 18 February 2023
the ordering of their presentation. But isn't this the mistaken interpretation that is explicitly rejected in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Objections...
41 KB (6,543 words) - 14:10, 13 June 2006
down as much as possible. I think there may be more to neutral articles than neutral point of view. For example perhaps Positive tone should be equally...
28 KB (4,517 words) - 14:10, 13 June 2006
I've started a subpage (Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view/Killing_NPOV) for discussion of an RfC regarding the proper unbiased terms to use for killings...
253 KB (39,488 words) - 00:50, 16 December 2023
NPOV/non-NPOV judgements of articles. (did I say objective? I meant absolutely, undisputedly objective) A neutral point of view is impossible (and unhealthy)...
23 KB (3,585 words) - 15:29, 7 May 2013
REDIRECT Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view...
188 bytes (7 words) - 07:26, 2 April 2011
the authors of this page. I also want to withdraw a suggestion I made earlier: while I like "perspectivist point of view" better than 'neutral', I grant...
65 KB (10,598 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
The neutral point of view is achieved by describing all significant points of view with their proper weight, not by balancing opposing points of view as...
253 KB (36,832 words) - 06:29, 30 January 2023