The Claremont Profile Method is a method for classifying ancient manuscripts of the Bible. It was elaborated by Ernest Cadman Colwell and his students...
18 KB (1,956 words) - 10:30, 23 June 2025
the New Testament. This method usually is known as the Claremont Profile Method. This method was developed in part to provide a means of selecting Greek...
12 KB (972 words) - 13:45, 17 June 2025
infiltration by the Byzantine text.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), its text is mixed in Luke 1, Luke...
35 KB (3,622 words) - 06:23, 12 May 2025
derived from the 1516 edition of Erasmus. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. In 1 John 5:6 it has textual variant δι' ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος καὶ...
12 KB (1,239 words) - 14:38, 5 January 2025
Hermann von Soden classified it to the family Ki. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data), it belongs to the textual...
9 KB (970 words) - 16:23, 25 June 2025
——— (2003). "A Comparison Between the Text und Textwert and the Claremont Profile Method Analyses of Manuscripts in the Gospel of Luke". New Testament Studies...
10 KB (973 words) - 10:30, 12 November 2024
placed it with some hesitation in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 1. Currently it is dated...
3 KB (302 words) - 01:58, 2 January 2021
purely or predominantly Byzantine text.": 336 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data), the codex presents a mixed...
11 KB (1,267 words) - 14:28, 17 December 2024
it the following textual profile - 111 41/2 02 5s. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to the textual...
8 KB (818 words) - 03:21, 2 June 2025
predominantly Byzantine text.": 336 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it has mixed text in Luke 1, mixed...
10 KB (981 words) - 16:41, 13 January 2024
it to the K1. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1, in Luke 10 it has...
4 KB (360 words) - 21:01, 1 July 2025
readings, especially in Mark[.]": 87 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis method of textual data), it represents the textual family...
14 KB (1,233 words) - 21:09, 13 January 2024
contains many remarkable readings of an early type. According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data), it represents the Alexandrian...
13 KB (1,221 words) - 11:50, 22 June 2025
family E. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kx in Luke 10 and Luke 20. In Luke...
23 KB (2,637 words) - 22:57, 28 October 2024
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Πa in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20...
5 KB (457 words) - 02:30, 26 April 2025
deserves to be classified as Kx? According to the Claremont Profile Method Kx has following profile in Luke 1, 10, and 20 are: Luke 1:10 — ην του λαου]...
12 KB (878 words) - 01:01, 8 June 2024
family Family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke 20. In John 1:29...
7 KB (589 words) - 23:09, 1 February 2022
Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 1519 in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
4 KB (326 words) - 01:18, 5 December 2023
It was confirmed by the Claremont Profile Method. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents Kr in Luke 1...
6 KB (553 words) - 22:01, 1 February 2025
47. Aland placed it in Category I. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was written in the 13th century in Messina. The...
4 KB (330 words) - 13:04, 19 August 2020
Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual family Kr in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke 10 no profile was made. It creates a pair...
4 KB (363 words) - 15:04, 11 December 2024
text of the codex in any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. F. H. A. Scrivener dated the manuscript to the 12th or 13th century...
6 KB (526 words) - 02:31, 26 April 2025
codex did not place it in any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The codex now is located in the Kenneth Willis Clark Collection...
3 KB (322 words) - 21:08, 3 January 2021
of the codex in any Category. It was not examined by using the Claremont Profile Method. The manuscript was added to the list of New Testament manuscripts...
4 KB (356 words) - 11:26, 17 October 2023
Kurt Aland did not place it in any Category. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents textual cluster 2148 in Luke 1 and Luke 20. In Luke...
6 KB (436 words) - 02:31, 26 April 2025
codex is not assigned to any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. Currently the codex is housed at the Biblioteca Nacional de España...
3 KB (222 words) - 04:26, 28 May 2020
from other sources as yet unidentified.": 335 According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data), it represents the textual...
10 KB (1,106 words) - 02:25, 26 April 2025
textual family Kx. Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it has mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1 and represent the textual...
6 KB (503 words) - 02:25, 26 April 2025
Aland did not place it in any Category. It was not examined by the Claremont Profile Method. The origin of this manuscript has been and remains the subject...
7 KB (594 words) - 17:58, 1 December 2021
family K1. Kurt Aland placed it in Category V. According to the Claremont Profile Method it represents the textual family Kx in Luke 1, Luke 10, and Luke...
7 KB (680 words) - 12:58, 30 November 2022