• be based on reliable, published sources". I suggest that the actual definition, in practice, is "A reliable source is a published source that experienced...
    36 KB (5,113 words) - 01:08, 1 November 2024
  • includes sources about which there is absolutely no genuine dispute as to reliability, such as mainstream media (e.g. BBC) It includes sources where there...
    51 KB (6,427 words) - 18:03, 31 October 2024
  • we need sufficient coverage from generally reliable sources to ensure due weight, but MEDRS-level sources aren't strictly necessary; 2) Or, "Given the...
    51 KB (6,889 words) - 18:57, 29 October 2024
  • (UTC) "Tons of reliable sources cite statistics and other aspects to unnamed experts" err, not. Indeed it's probably a tell of a rubbish source if it does...
    43 KB (3,733 words) - 19:32, 9 October 2024
  • research and reliable sources. We need to exclude biased and unreliable sources of inforamtion such as many in mass media published sources and make provisions...
    259 KB (38,824 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
  • order to support the claim that Khan is of Pashtun origin (when other reliable sources state his Pathan roots), users have claimed that the term 'Pathan'...
    169 KB (26,785 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
  • are reliable sources to be used in article about current events. There is no doubt about that. The issue here is whether they can be used as sources for...
    89 KB (13,374 words) - 18:31, 3 March 2023
  • the material, or claims a source is reliable, right? I've seen many users say "prove that the sources I'm adding is not reliable". But that is generally...
    250 KB (37,644 words) - 18:48, 7 April 2023
  • reliable sources on history or science but are reliable sources on their respective religion and related subjects; Primary sources are very reliable when...
    78 KB (11,590 words) - 22:27, 23 September 2024
  • recommend seeking reliable published sources or people with personal experience who can serve as primary sources. If no such sources exist, you could either...
    151 KB (24,064 words) - 23:43, 14 October 2024
  • 24 June 2007 (UTC) A section Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Frequently used sources that do not qualify as reliable was just added here and it is based on...
    256 KB (38,575 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
  • Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources. This page was...
    290 KB (39 words) - 03:29, 1 November 2024
  • their sources. Only good links should be linked on Wikipedia. The article on Aisha cites its sources - WikiIslam is meant to be a reliable source of knowledge...
    162 KB (26,389 words) - 17:25, 4 February 2023
  • only allowing reliable sources, but distinguishing between: unbiased sources sources that may be seen as biased (or partial). These sources would only be...
    241 KB (37,949 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
  • Modern sources are on average more reliable then old ones The older the source, the more likely it is to have problems with neutrality Sources written...
    260 KB (40,111 words) - 06:20, 30 January 2023
  • source supports this statement in an article? At Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Don't forget to tell the editors the full name of the source...
    36 bytes (627 words) - 10:47, 21 November 2021
  • mentions: The principal description of reliable sources is the sources section of Wikipedia:Verifiability. Reliable sources are necessary to avoid original research...
    252 KB (37,939 words) - 10:40, 26 May 2022
  • definition ? Reliable sources are credible. Reliable sources are reliable. Reliable sources are trustworthy (and authoritative) "Reliable sources are credible...
    259 KB (39,371 words) - 20:48, 2 March 2023
  • edition of the original reliable source? BTfromLA 00:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC) From Wikipedia:Citing sources#Intermediate sources: State where you got it...
    176 KB (28,298 words) - 16:40, 18 February 2023
  • the sources you want here are called "secondary" sources, not "third-party" sources. Actually, Wikipedia IS a third-party source or tertiary source: http://www...
    252 KB (37,495 words) - 14:15, 28 January 2023
  • some attention to the "reliable source"-defining sections of WP:V too. I mean the three last subsections of WP:V#Sources: "Sources of dubious reliability"...
    255 KB (39,995 words) - 14:15, 28 January 2023
  • The problem is that if we have no reliable sources there is nothing we can write without relying on unreliable sources or original research in the technical...
    121 KB (18,302 words) - 07:38, 3 April 2023
  • is based on genuine reliable sources, you would quote those sources rather than the blog. If the blog content has no reliable source behind it, the blog...
    291 KB (45,795 words) - 12:50, 10 March 2023
  • those news sources that appear in Google news be taken as Reliable Sources? My personal belief is that we should take them all to be reliable publications...
    138 KB (19,817 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
  • Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources_in_articles_about_themselves; and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Self-published_sources_as_secondary_sources. ≈...
    273 KB (43,744 words) - 17:24, 4 February 2023
  • source in relation to the 3rd. In relation to findings of fact, these are only made having considered primary sources and thus are clearly "reliable,...
    36 KB (5,683 words) - 17:40, 3 September 2024
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Official_policy_regarding_genetics_sources Thanks for your attention. Hunan201p (talk)...
    5 KB (716 words) - 17:38, 3 September 2024
  • whatever sources, rather than trying to create a complex source taxonomy. And the bottom line is that some encyclopedias are considered reliable sources, regardless...
    354 KB (55,638 words) - 05:46, 5 April 2022
  • aren't as reliable as this policy expects. However, secondary sources that are based mainly on sources Wikipedia would not consider reliable should be...
    133 KB (21,106 words) - 13:41, 8 August 2021
  • RfC: Should Template:Supplement be added to WP:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, in place of Template:Essay? - MrX 🖋 12:24, 8 August 2018...
    115 KB (14,557 words) - 01:37, 13 May 2019