French
Deutsch1903 United States Senate election in South Carolina
 | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 County results Latimer: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% Evans: 50–60% 60–70% | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| Elections in South Carolina |
|---|
 |
The 1903 South Carolina United States Senate election, held January 27, 1903 to select the U.S. senator from the state of South Carolina, was predetermined by the Democratic Party primary election held on August 26, 1902, and September 9. Democrats were so overwhelmingly dominant that their nomination was tantamount to the general election.
Prior to the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the United States Constitution, U.S. senators were elected by the state legislature and not through the direct election by the people of the state. However, the Democratic Party of South Carolina organized primary elections for the U.S. Senate beginning in 1896 and the General Assembly would confirm the choice of the Democratic voters. Tillmanite Democrat Asbury Latimer won the Democratic primary and was elected by the General Assembly for a six-year term.
Democratic primary
[edit]Candidates
[edit]- William Elliott, U.S. Representative from Beaufort
- John Gary Evans, former Governor of South Carolina
- John J. Hemphill, former U.S. Representative from Chester
- Dan S. Henderson
- George Johnstone, former U.S. Representative from Newberry County
- Asbury Latimer, U.S. Representative from Belton
Campaign
[edit]In the special election of 1897, the Conservatives were without a candidate so in 1902 four candidates vied for the support of Conservatives: Dan S. Henderson, William Elliott, George Johnstone and John J. Hemphill. The two remaining candidates in the race, Representative Asbury Latimer and former Governor John Gary Evans, were strong Tillmanites. However, they held strongly opposing views and a duel almost ensued between the two while campaigning at St. George on July 12. A fight did indeed break out between Latimer and Hemphill when they were campaigning in Gaffney on August 14. Latimer took offence to an accusation by Hemphill and struck him. Hemphill was unable to strike back because Latimer quickly left the scene.
On August 26, Latimer and Evans emerged as the top two candidates in the field and were to face each other in a runoff election on September 9. The Conservative candidates had garnered more votes combined than the combined vote of Latimer and Evans, but their inability to coalesce around a single candidate prevented a Conservative from winning the election. Evans was widely disliked by Conservatives in the state so they threw their support behind Latimer and he easily won the runoff election.
Results
[edit]| Democratic Primary | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Votes | % |
| Asbury Latimer | 22,971 | 24.1 |
| John Gary Evans | 17,993 | 18.9 |
| Dan S. Henderson | 13,771 | 14.5 |
| William Elliott | 13,658 | 14.4 |
| George Johnstone | 13,556 | 14.2 |
| John J. Hemphill | 13,261 | 13.9 |
| Democratic Primary Runoff | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Votes | % | ±% |
| Asbury Latimer | 53,890 | 59.7 | +35.6 |
| John Gary Evans | 36,371 | 40.3 | +21.4 |
See also
[edit]- List of United States senators from South Carolina
- 1902 and 1903 United States Senate elections
- 1902 United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina
- 1902 South Carolina gubernatorial election
References
[edit]- Jordan, Frank E. The Primary State: A History of the Democratic Party in South Carolina, 1876-1962. pp. 56–59.
- "Candidates Use Threats". New York Times. July 13, 1902. p. 2.
- "Senatorial Candidates Indulge in Fisticuffs". New York Times. August 15, 1902. p. 2.
- "Latimer's Lucky Election". New York Times. September 12, 1902. p. 2.