Andrew II of Hungary

Andrew II
Seal of Andrew II, 1224
King of Hungary and Croatia
Reign7 May 1205 – 21 September 1235
Coronation29 May 1205, Székesfehérvár
PredecessorLadislaus III
SuccessorBéla IV
Prince of Halych
Reign1188–1189 or 1190
1208 or 1209–1210
Predecessor
Successor
Bornc. 1177
Died21 September 1235 (aged 57–58)
Burial
Egres Abbey
Spouses
Issue
DynastyÁrpád
FatherBéla III of Hungary
MotherAgnes of Antioch
ReligionRoman Catholic

Andrew II (Hungarian: II. András, Croatian: Andrija II., Slovak: Ondrej II., Ukrainian: Андрій II; c. 1177 – 21 September 1235), also known as Andrew of Jerusalem, was King of Hungary and Croatia between 1205 and 1235. He ruled the Principality of Halych from 1188 until 1189/1190, and again between 1208/1209 and 1210. He was the younger son of Béla III of Hungary, who entrusted him with the administration of the newly conquered Principality of Halych in 1188. Andrew's rule was unpopular, and the boyars (or noblemen) expelled him. Béla III willed property and money to Andrew, obliging him to lead a crusade to the Holy Land. Instead, Andrew forced his elder brother, King Emeric of Hungary, to cede Croatia and Dalmatia as an appanage to him in 1197. The following year, Andrew occupied Hum.

Despite the fact that Andrew did not stop conspiring against Emeric, the dying king made Andrew guardian of his son, Ladislaus III, in 1204. After the premature death of Ladislaus, Andrew ascended the throne in 1205. According to historian László Kontler, "[i]t was amidst the socio-political turmoil during [Andrew's] reign that the relations, arrangements, institutional framework and social categories that arose under Stephen I, started to disintegrate in the higher echelons of society" in Hungary.[1] Andrew introduced a new grants policy, the so-called "new institutions", giving away money and royal estates to his partisans despite the loss of royal revenues. He was the first Hungarian monarch to adopt the title of "King of Halych and Lodomeria". He waged at least a dozen wars to seize the two Rus' principalities, but was repelled by the local boyars and neighboring princes. He participated in the Fifth Crusade to the Holy Land in 1217–1218, but the crusade was a failure.

When the servientes regis, or "royal servants", rose up, Andrew was forced to issue the Golden Bull of 1222, confirming their privileges. This led to the rise of the nobility in the Kingdom of Hungary. His Diploma Andreanum of 1224 listed the liberties of the Transylvanian Saxon community. The employment of Jews and Muslims to administer the royal revenues led him into conflict with the Holy See and the Hungarian prelates. Andrew pledged to respect the privileges of the clergymen and to dismiss his non-Christian officials in 1233, but he never fulfilled the latter promise.

Andrew's first wife, Gertrude of Merania, was murdered in 1213 because her blatant favoritism towards her German kinsmen and courtiers stirred up discontent among the native lords. The veneration of their daughter, Elizabeth of Hungary, was confirmed by the Holy See during Andrew's lifetime. After Andrew's death, his sons, Béla and Coloman, accused his third wife, Beatrice d'Este, of adultery and never considered her son, Stephen, to be a legitimate son of Andrew.

Early life

[edit]

Childhood and youth (c. 1177–1197)

[edit]

Andrew was the second son of King Béla III and Béla's first wife, Agnes of Antioch.[2] The year of Andrew's birth is not known, but modern historians agree that he was born around 1177,[2][3][4] considering that Margaret, who was born in 1175 or 1176, was his elder sister, which, however, is far from certain.[5] Andrew was first mentioned in connection to his father's invasion of the Principality of Halych in 1188.[6] That year, Béla III invaded Halych upon the request of its former prince, Vladimir II Yaroslavich, who had been expelled by his subjects.[6][7] Béla forced the new prince, Roman Mstislavich, to flee. After conquering Halych, he granted it to Andrew.[8][9] Béla also captured Vladimir Yaroslavich and imprisoned him in Hungary.[10]

After Béla's withdrawal from Halych, Roman Mstislavich returned with the assistance of Rurik Rostislavich, Prince of Belgorod Kievsky.[10] They tried to expel Andrew and his Hungarian retinue, but the Hungarians routed the united forces of Mstislavich and Rostislavich.[10] A group of local boyars offered the throne to Rostislav Ivanovich, a distant cousin of the imprisoned Vladimir Yaroslavich.[10] Béla III sent reinforcements to Halych, enabling Andrew's troops to repel the attacks.[11] Andrew's nominal reign remained unpopular in Halych, because the Hungarian soldiers insulted local women and did not respect Orthodox churches.[10][12] Consequently, the local boyars allied themselves with their former prince, Vladimir Yaroslavich, who had escaped from captivity and returned to Halych.[13] Duke Casimir II of Poland also supported Vladimir Yaroslavich, and they expelled Andrew and his retinue from the principality in August 1189 or 1190.[14][15][13] Andrew returned to Hungary after his defeat.[8]

He did not receive a separate duchy from his father, who only gave him some fortresses, estates and money.[8] According to historian Attila Zsoldos, these landholdings laid in Slavonia.[16] On his deathbed, Béla III, who had pledged to lead a crusade to the Holy Land, ordered Andrew to fulfill his vow.[17] Andrew's father died on 23 April 1196, and Andrew's older brother, Emeric, succeeded him.[18]

Duke of Croatia and Dalmatia (1197–1204)

[edit]
Main article: Brothers' Quarrel (Hungary)

Andrew used the funds that he inherited from his father to recruit supporters among the Hungarian lords.[4] It is plausible he demanded from his brother to install him as Duke of Slavonia, which became increasingly the title of heir to the throne by the second half of the 12th century.[16] Andrew also formed an alliance with Duke Leopold VI of Austria, and they plotted against Emeric.[4] Their united troops routed the royal army at Mački, Slavonia, in December 1197.[19] Under duress, King Emeric gave Croatia and Dalmatia to Andrew as an appanage, as most historians believe.[20][21] In contrast, historian György Szabados claims that Emeric never acknowledged Andrew's dominion in Croatia and Dalmatia and that Andrew used the title of duke without his brother's approval.[21] In practice, Andrew administered Croatia and Dalmatia as an independent monarch. He minted coins, granted land and confirmed privileges.[20][22][19] In accordance with the agreement, Varaždin and Bodrog counties also belonged to his suzerainty.[23] He cooperated with the Frankopans, Babonići, and other local lords.[20] Some of the prominent barons also supported his aspirations, including their uncle comes Andrew and Macarius Monoszló.[24] The Canons Regular of the Holy Sepulchre settled in the province during his rule.[25] Taking advantage of Miroslav of Hum's death, Andrew invaded Hum and occupied at least the land between the Cetina and Neretva rivers sometime before May 1198.[26] He styled himself, "By the grace of God, Duke of Zadar and of all Dalmatia, Croatia and Hum" in his charters.[27]

Pope Innocent III urged Andrew to lead a crusade to the Holy Land, but Andrew hatched a new conspiracy against Emeric with the help of John, Abbot of Pannonhalma, Boleslaus, Bishop of Vác, and many other prelates and lords.[19] For instance, incumbent Palatine Mog also betrayed Emeric and swore allegiance to the Duke.[28] The Pope threatened Andrew with excommunication if he failed to fulfill his father's vow, but Andrew did not yield.[29] The conspiracy was uncovered on 10 March 1199, when King Emeric seized letters written by Andrew's partisans to Bishop Boleslaus.[30] That summer, royal troops routed Andrew's army in the valley of Rád near Lake Balaton, and Andrew fled to Austria.[4][30] During Andrew's exile, Emeric appointed his own partisans to administer Slavonia, Croatia and Dalmatia.[31] A papal legate mediated a reconciliation between Andrew and Emeric, who allowed Andrew to return to Croatia and Dalmatia in 1200.[30] Andrew married Gertrude of Merania sometime between 1200 and 1203; her father, Berthold, Duke of Merania, owned extensive domains in the Holy Roman Empire along the borders of Andrew's duchy, in what is now Slovenia.[20][30][32]

The "Árpád stripes": four silver and four red stripes
The "Árpád stripes" (four Argent (silver) and four Gules (red) stripes) on Andrew's personal coat-of-arms

When Emeric's son, Ladislaus, was born around 1200, Andrew's hopes to succeed his brother as king were shattered.[4][32] Pope Innocent confirmed the child's position as heir to the crown, declaring that Andrew's future sons would only inherit Andrew's duchy.[32][30] Andrew planned a new rebellion against his brother, but King Emeric captured him without resistance near Varaždin in October 1203.[33] In contrast, historian Attila Zsoldos considers it was the king who turned against his brother's province with an army initially convened for a crusade.[34]

[All] the magnates of the kingdom and almost the whole of the Hungarian army deserted [King Emeric] and unlawfully sided with Duke Andrew. Very few men indeed remained with the king, and even they were terrified at the extent of the insurrection and did not dare to urge the king to hope for success, but rather advised him to flee. Then it happened that one day both sides had drawn close to each other and were beginning to prepare themselves in earnest for battle. ... [After] much wise thought, with inspiration from heaven [King Emeric] found a successful way by which he might recover his right to the kingdom and still remain guiltless of bloodshed. So he said to his men, "Stay here a while, and do not follow me." Then he laid down his weapons, and taking only a leafy bough in his hand he walked slowly into the enemy ranks. As he passed through the midst of the armed multitude, he cried out in a loud and strong voice, "Now I shall see who will dare to raise a hand to shed the blood of the royal lineage!" Seeing him, all fell back, and not daring even to mutter, they left a wide passage for him on either side. And then when [King Emeric] reached his brother, he took him, and leading him outside the body of troops, he sent him to a certain castle for custody.

— Thomas the Archdeacon: History of the Bishops of Salona and Split[35]

Andrew was first imprisoned in the fort of Gornji Kneginec, then in Esztergom.[33] Alexander of the Hont-Pázmány clan freed him in early 1204.[18][33] It is uncertain whether Andrew was freed by his partisans or his release took place with Emeric's consent.[34] Having fallen ill, King Emeric had his son, Ladislaus, crowned king on 26 August.[36] As Pope Innocent already ordered Archbishop Ugrin Csák to perform the coronation in April, it is plausible that the king decided on Andrew's release, therefore, the coronation was not vitally urgent.[37] Andrew reconciled with his dying brother, who entrusted him with "the guardianship of his son and the administration of the entire kingdom until the ward should reach the age of majority",[38] according to the nearly contemporaneous Thomas the Archdeacon.[4]

Nephew's guardian (1204–1205)

[edit]

King Emeric died on 30 November 1204.[36] Andrew governed the kingdom as Ladislaus's regent, but subsequently he counted his regnal years from the time of his brother's death, showing that he already regarded himself as the lawful monarch during Ladislaus III's reign.[36] Pope Innocent told Andrew that he should remain loyal to Ladislaus,[39] also instructing him to fulfill his vow to lead a crusade, to secure the incomes of Emeric's widow and Ladislaus III's mother, Constance of Aragon, and to keep royal property intact. The pope's letters suggest that serious tensions burdened the relationship between Andrew and Constance after Emeric's death.[40]

Instead, Andrew seized the money that Emeric had deposited for Ladislaus in Pilis Abbey.[39] He also confiscated a significant portion of private wealth from Constance, who deposited it in the Stephanites' convent in Esztergom prior to that, in addition to the denial of her dower.[41] Queen Constance fled from Hungary, taking her son and the Holy Crown to Austria.[11] According to the Annals of Admont, "some bishops and nobles" escorted them, breaking through the blockade that Andrew erected along the Austrian border.[42] Andrew prepared for a war against Leopold VI of Austria, but Ladislaus suddenly died in Vienna on 7 May 1205.[43] Andrew sent Bishop Peter of Győr to Austria, who successfully recovered the Holy Crown.[44]

Reign

[edit]

"New institutions" and campaigns in Halych (1205–1217)

[edit]
A crowned man holding a flag in his left hand
Andrew II depicted in Illuminated Chronicle
Chronica Hungarorum, Thuróczy chronicle, King Andrew II of Hungary, throne, crown, orb, scepter, medieval, Hungarian chronicle, book, illustration, history
Andrew II depicted in Chronica Hungarorum

John, Archbishop of Kalocsa, crowned Andrew king in Székesfehérvár on 29 May 1205.[11][45] Andrew introduced a new policy for royal grants, which he called "new institutions" in one of his charters.[46][47] He distributed large portions of the royal domain—royal castles and all estates attached to them—as inheritable grants to his supporters, declaring that "the best measure of a royal grant is its being immeasurable."[47][48] His "new institutions" altered the relations between the monarchs and the Hungarian lords. During the previous two centuries, a lord's status primarily depended on the income he received for his services to the monarch; after the introduction of the "new institutions", their inheritable estates yielded sufficient revenues.[1] This policy also diminished the funds upon which the authority of the ispáns, or heads, of the counties—who were appointed by the monarchs—had been based.[49]

During his reign, Andrew was intensely interested in the internal affairs of his former principality of Halych.[36] He launched his first campaign to recapture Halych in 1205 or 1206.[36][11][50] Upon the boyars' request, he intervened against Vsevolod Svyatoslavich, Prince of Chernigov, and his allies on behalf of Daniel Romanovich, the child-prince of Halych, and Lodomeria. Svyatoslavich and his allies were forced to withdraw.[51][11] Andrew adopted the title of "King of Galicia and Lodomeria", demonstrating his claim to suzerainty in the two principalities.[52][53] After Andrew returned to Hungary, Vsevolod Svyatoslavich's distant cousin, Vladimir Igorevich, seized both Halych and Lodomeria, expelling Daniel Romanovich and his mother.[54] They fled to Leszek I of Poland, who suggested that they visit Andrew.[11][55] However, Vladimir Igorevich "sent many gifts" to both Andrew and Leszek, dissuading "them from attacking him"[56] on behalf of Romanovich, according to the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle.[11][55] Vladimir Igorevich's rebellious brother, Roman Igorevich, soon came to Hungary, seeking Andrew's assistance.[55] Roman returned to Halych and expelled Vladimir Igorevich with the help of Hungarian auxiliary troops.[55]

Andrew confirmed the liberties of two Dalmatian towns—Split and Omiš—and issued a new charter listing the privileges of the archbishops of Split in 1207.[57] Taking advantage of a conflict between Roman Igorevich and his boyars, Andrew sent troops to Halych under the command of Benedict, son of Korlát.[58] Benedict captured Roman Igorevich and occupied the principality in 1208 or 1209.[59][58] Instead of appointing a new prince, Andrew made Benedict governor of Halych.[60] Benedict "tortured boyars and was addicted to lechery",[61] according to the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle. The boyars offered the throne to Mstislav Mstislavich, Prince of Novgorod, if he could overthrow Benedict.[58] Mstislav Mstislavich invaded Halych, but he could not defeat Benedict.[58]

A queen reading a book and a bearded king holding a sceptre
Gertrude of Merania and Andrew depicted in the 13th-century Landgrafenpsalter from the Landgraviate of Thuringia

Queen Gertrude's two brothers, Ekbert of Bamberg, Bishop of Bamberg, and Henry II, Margrave of Istria, fled to Hungary in 1208 after they were accused of participating in the murder of Philip, King of the Germans.[58][62][63] Andrew granted large domains to Bishop Ekbert in the Szepesség region (now Spiš, Slovakia).[62] Gertrude's youngest brother, Berthold, had been Archbishop of Kalocsa since 1206; he was made Ban of Croatia and Dalmatia in 1209.[64][65] Andrew's generosity towards his wife's German relatives and courtiers discontented the local lords.[66][67] According to historian Gyula Kristó, the anonymous author of The Deeds of the Hungarians referred to the Germans from the Holy Roman Empire when he sarcastically mentioned that "now ... the Romans graze on the goods of Hungary."[68][69] In 1209, Zadar, which had been lost to the Venetians, was liberated by one of Andrew's Dalmatian vassals, Domald of Sidraga, but the Venetians recaptured the town a year later.[70][71]

Roman Igorevich reconciled with his brother, Vladimir Igorevich, in early 1209 or 1210.[72][73] Their united forces vanquished Benedict's army, expelling the Hungarians from Halych.[72][73] Vladimir Igorevich sent one of his sons, Vsevolod Vladimirovich, "bearing gifts to the king in Hungary"[74] to appease Andrew, according to the Galician–Volhynian Chronicle.[73] A group of discontented Hungarian lords offered the crown to Andrew's cousins, the sons of Andrew's uncle, Géza; they lived in "Greek land" (the Byzantine Empire). However, the cousins' envoys were captured in Split in 1210.[72][75] In the early 1210s, Andrew sent "an army of Saxons, Vlachs, Székelys and Pechenegs" commanded by Joachim, Count of Hermannstadt, (now Sibiu, Romania) to assist Boril of Bulgaria's fight against three rebellious Cuman chieftains.[76][77] Around the same time, Hungarian troops occupied Belgrade and Barancs (now Braničevo, Serbia), which had been lost to Bulgaria under Emeric.[78][79] Andrew's army defeated the Cumans at Vidin.[80] Andrew granted the Barcaság (now Țara Bârsei, Romania) to the Teutonic Knights.[81] The Knights were to defend the easternmost regions of the Kingdom of Hungary against the Cumans and encourage their conversion to Catholicism.[82][83]

A group of boyars, who were alarmed by the despotic acts of Vladimir Igorevich, asked Andrew to restore Daniel Romanovich as ruler of Halych in 1210 or 1211.[73][84] Andrew and his allies—Leszek I of Poland and at least five Rus' princes—sent their armies to Halych and restored Daniel Romanovich.[84][85] Local boyars expelled Daniel Romanovich's mother in 1212.[84] She persuaded Andrew to personally lead his army to Halych.[84] He captured Volodislav Kormilchich, the most influential boyar, and took him to Hungary.[84] After Andrew withdrew from Halych, the boyars again offered the throne to Mstislav Mstislavich, who expelled Daniel Romanovich and his mother from the principality.[84] Andrew departed for a new campaign against Halych in summer 1213.[84] During his absence, Hungarian lords who were aggrieved at Queen Gertrude's favoritism towards her German entourage captured and murdered her and many of her courtiers in the Pilis Hills on 28 September.[46][84][86] When he heard of her murder, Andrew returned to Hungary and ordered the execution of the murderer, Peter, son of Töre.[46] However, Peter's accomplices, including Palatine Bánk Bár-Kalán, did not receive severe punishments.[46][86] A group of Hungarian lords, whom Andrew called "perverts" in one of his letters, was plotting to dethrone Andrew and crown his eldest son, the eight-year-old Béla, but they failed to dethrone him and could only force Andrew to consent to Béla's coronation in 1214.[87][88]

Andrew and Leszek of Poland signed a treaty of alliance, which obliged Andrew's second son, Coloman, to marry Leszek of Poland's daughter, Salomea.[79] Andrew and Leszek jointly invaded Halych in 1214, and Coloman was made prince. He agreed to cede Przemyśl to Leszek of Poland.[79][75] The following year, Andrew returned to Halych and captured Przemyśl.[79] Leszek of Poland soon reconciled with Mstislav Mstislavich; they jointly invaded Halych and forced Coloman to flee to Hungary.[79] A new officer of state, the treasurer, was responsible for the administration of the royal chamber from around 1214 onwards.[79][89] However, royal revenues had significantly diminished.[47] Upon the advice of the treasurer, Denis, son of Ampud, Andrew imposed new taxes and farmed out royal income from minting, salt trade and custom duties.[90][79] The yearly exchange of coins also produced more revenue for the royal chamber.[65] However, these measures provoked discontent in Hungary.[65]

Andrew signed a new treaty of alliance with Leszek of Poland in the summer of 1216.[91] Leszek and Andrew's son, Coloman, invaded Halych and expelled Mstislav Mstislavich and Daniel Romanovich, after which Coloman was restored.[91] That same year, Andrew met Stephen Nemanjić, Grand Prince of Serbia, in Ravno (now Ćuprija, Serbia).[92][93] He persuaded Stephen Nemanjić to negotiate with Henry, Latin Emperor of Constantinople, who was the uncle of Andrew's second wife, Yolanda de Courtenay.[92][93] Stephen Nemanjić was crowned king of Serbia in 1217.[94] Andrew planned to invade Serbia, but Stephen Nemanjić's brother, Sava, dissuaded him, according to both versions of the Life of Sava.[92][94]

Andrew's crusade (1217–1218)

[edit]
A horseman with a flag depicting a two-barred cross
Andrew at the head of his crusader army (from the Illuminated Chronicle)

In July 1216, the newly elected Pope Honorius III once again called upon Andrew to fulfill his father's vow to lead a crusade.[95] Andrew, who had postponed the crusade at least three times (in 1201, 1209 and 1213), finally agreed.[96][97] Steven Runciman, Tibor Almási and other modern historians say that Andrew hoped that his decision would increase his likelihood of being elected as Latin Emperor of Constantinople, because his wife's uncle, Emperor Henry, had died in June.[52][97][98] According to a letter written by Pope Honorius in 1217, envoys from the Latin Empire had actually informed Andrew that they planned to elect either him or his father-in-law, Peter of Courtenay, as emperor.[99] Nonetheless, the barons of the Latin Empire elected Peter of Courtenay in the summer of 1216.[97][100][101]

Andrew sold and mortgaged royal estates to finance his campaign, which became part of the Fifth Crusade.[96] He renounced his claim to Zadar in favor of the Republic of Venice so that he could secure shipping for his army.[70][96] He entrusted Hungary to Archbishop John of Esztergom, and entrusted Croatia and Dalmatia to Pontius de Cruce, the Templar prior of Vrana.[96] In July 1217, Andrew departed from Zagreb, accompanied by Dukes Leopold VI of Austria and Otto I of Merania.[102][103] His army was so large—at least 10,000 mounted soldiers and uncountable infantrymen—that most of it stayed behind when Andrew and his men embarked in Split two months later.[102][104][105] The ships transported them to Acre, where they landed in October.[103]

The leaders of the crusade included John of Brienne, King of Jerusalem, Leopold of Austria, the Grand Masters of the Hospitallers, the Templars and the Teutonic Knights. They held a war council in Acre, with Andrew leading the meeting.[106] In early November, the Crusaders launched a campaign for the Jordan River, forcing Al-Adil I, Sultan of Egypt, to withdraw without fighting; the crusaders then pillaged Beisan.[107][108] After the crusaders returned to Acre, Andrew did not participate in any other military actions.[109][110] Instead, he collected relics, including a water jug allegedly used at the marriage at Cana, the heads of Saint Stephen and Margaret the Virgin, the right hands of the Apostles Thomas and Bartholomew and a part of Aaron's rod.[110] If Thomas the Archdeacon's report of certain "evil and audacious men" in Acre who "treacherously passed him a poisoned drink"[111] is reliable, Andrew's inactivity was because of illness.[109]

Andrew decided to return home at the very beginning of 1218, even though Raoul of Merencourt, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, threatened him with excommunication.[112][113] Andrew first visited Tripoli and participated in the marriage of Bohemond IV of Antioch and Melisende of Lusignan on 10 January.[109] From Tripoli, he travelled to Cilicia, where he and Leo I of Armenia betrothed Andrew's youngest son, Andrew, and Leo's daughter, Isabella.[109][114] Andrew proceeded through the Seldjuk Sultanate of Rum before arriving in Nicaea (now İznik, Turkey).[109] His cousins (the sons of his uncle, Géza) attacked him when he was in Nicaea.[114] He arranged the marriage of his oldest son, Béla, to Maria Laskarina, a daughter of Emperor Theodore I Laskaris.[114] When he arrived in Bulgaria, Andrew was detained until he "gave full surety that his daughter would be united in marriage"[111] to Ivan Asen II of Bulgaria, according to Thomas the Archdeacon.[115][116] Andrew returned to Hungary in late 1218.[103] Andrew's "crusade had achieved nothing and brought him no honor", according to historian Thomas Van Cleve.[117] Oliver of Paderborn, James of Vitry and other 13th-century authors blamed Andrew for the failure of the crusade.[117] Stephen Donnachie says that "...from examining Honorius’s registers and the diplomatic communications between Andrew and the papal curia, Andrew’s genuine commitment to the crusade should not be doubted nor his extensive preparations for the campaign dismissed, even if he did ultimately bungle his opportunity."[118]

Golden Bull (1218–1222)

[edit]
A manuscript with a seal attached to it
The Golden Bull of 1222

When he returned to Hungary, Andrew complained to Pope Honorius that his kingdom was "in a miserable and destroyed state, deprived of all of its revenues." [12] A group of barons had even expelled Archbishop John from Hungary.[103] Andrew was in massive debt because of his crusade, which forced him to impose extraordinarily high taxes and debase coinage.[12] In 1218 or 1219, Mstislav Mstislavich invaded Halych and captured Andrew's son, Coloman.[119][120] Andrew compromised with Mstislavich. Coloman was released, and Andrew's youngest son and namesake was betrothed to Mstislavich's daughter.[119] In 1220, a group of lords persuaded Andrew to make his eldest son, Béla, the duke of Croatia, Dalmatia and Slavonia.[114][121]

Andrew employed Jews and Muslims to administer royal revenues, which caused a discord between Andrew and the Holy See starting in the early 1220s.[122][123] Pope Honorius urged Andrew and Queen Yolanda to prohibit Muslims from employing Christians.[123] Andrew confirmed the privileges of clergymen, including their exemption from taxes and their right to be exclusively judged by church courts, but also prohibited the consecration of udvornici, castle folk and other serfs in early 1222.[124][125] However, a new conflict emerged between Andrew and the Holy See after he persuaded Béla to separate from his wife, Maria Laskarina.[126] An "immense crowd" approached Andrew around April 1222, demanding "grave and unjust things", according to a letter of Pope Honorius.[87] Actually, the royal servants—who were landowners directly subject to the monarch's power and obliged to fight in the royal army—assembled, forcing Andrew to dismiss Julius Kán and his other officials. Andrew was also forced to issue a royal charter, the Golden Bull of 1222.[127] The charter summarized the liberties of the royal servants, including their exemption from taxes and the jurisdiction of the ispáns.[87][128] The last clause of the Golden Bull authorized "the bishops as well as the other barons and nobles of the realm, singularly and in common" to resist the monarch if he did not honor the provisions of the charter.[87][86] The Golden Bull clearly distinguished the royal servants from the king's other subjects, which led to the rise of the Hungarian nobility.[87] The Golden Bull is commonly compared with England's Magna Carta – a similar charter which was sealed a few years earlier in 1215.[129] A significant difference between them is that, in England, the settlement strengthened the position of all the royal subjects but, in Hungary, the aristocracy came to dominate both the crown and the lower orders.[130]

Conflicts with son and the Church (1222–1234)

[edit]

Andrew discharged Palatine Theodore Csanád and restored Julius Kán in the second half of 1222.[131] The following year, Pope Honorius urged Andrew to launch a new crusade.[132] If the report of the Continuatio Claustroneuburgensis is reliable, Andrew took the cross to show that he intended to launch a new crusade, but no other sources mention this event.[132] Andrew planned to arrange a new marriage for his eldest son, Béla, but Pope Honorius mediated a reconciliation between Béla and his wife in the autumn of 1223.[131][126] This angered Andrew, and Béla fled to Austria. He returned in 1224 after the bishops persuaded Andrew to forgive him.[131]

In his Diploma Andreanum of 1224, Andrew confirmed the privileges of the "Saxons" who inhabited the region of Hermannstadt in southern Transylvania (now Sibiu, Romania).[133][134] The following year, he launched a campaign against the Teutonic Knights, who had attempted to eliminate his suzerainty. The Knights were forced to leave Barcaság and the neighboring lands.[133][135] Andrew's envoys and Leopold VI of Austria signed a treaty on 6 June, which ended the armed conflicts along the Hungarian-Austrian border. As part of the treaty, Leopold VI paid an indemnification for the damages that his troops had caused in Hungary.[136] Andrew made his oldest son, Béla, Duke of Transylvania. Béla's former duchy was given to Andrew's second son, Coloman, in 1226.[136] Duke Béla started expanding his suzerainty over the Cumans, who inhabited the lands east of the Carpathian Mountains.[137][138] Andrew launched a campaign against Mstislav Mstislavich in 1226 because the latter refused to grant Halych to Andrew's youngest son despite a previous compromise.[136] Andrew besieged and captured Przemyśl, Terebovl, and other fortresses in Halych.[136] However, his troops were routed at Kremenets and Zvenigorod, forcing him to withdraw.[136] Despite his victories, Mstislavich ceded Halych to Andrew's son in early 1227.[136]

A crowned man holding a sealed document
Andrew's statute on Heroes' Square in Budapest

In 1228, Andrew authorized his son, Béla, to revise his previous land grants.[139] Pope Honorius also supported Béla's efforts.[139] Béla confiscated the domains of two noblemen, Simon Kacsics and Bánk Bár-Kalán, who had taken part in the conspiracy to murder Queen Gertrude.[139] In 1229, upon Béla's proposal, Andrew confirmed the privileges of the Cuman chieftains who had subjected themselves to Béla.[140] Robert, Archbishop of Esztergom, made a complaint about Andrew to the Holy See, because Andrew continued to employ Jews and Muslims.[141] Pope Gregory IX authorized the archbishop to perform acts of religious censure to persuade Andrew to dismiss his non-Christian officials.[142] Under duress, Andrew issued a new Golden Bull in 1231, which confirmed that Muslims were banned from employment, and empowered the Archbishop of Esztergom to excommunicate the king if he failed to honor the provisions of the new Golden Bull.[142][87][143] In the second half of the year, Andrew invaded Halych and restored his youngest son, Andrew, to the throne.[142]

Archbishop Robert excommunicated Palatine Denis and put Hungary under an interdict on 25 February 1232, because the employment of Jews and Muslims continued despite the Golden Bull of 1231.[144][145] Since the archbishop accused the Muslims of persuading Andrew to seize church property, Andrew restored properties to the archbishop, who soon suspended the interdict.[144][145] Upon Andrew's demand, Pope Gregory sent Cardinal Giacomo di Pecorari as his legate to Hungary and promised that nobody would be excommunicated without the pope's special authorization.[145] Although Andrew departed for Halych to support his youngest son in a fight against Daniel Romanivich, he continued his negotiations with the papal legate.[146] On 20 August 1233, in the forests of Bereg, he vowed that he would not employ Jews and Muslims to administrate royal revenues, and would pay 10,000 marks as compensation for usurped Church revenues.[87][147] Andrew repeated his oath in Esztergom in September.[146]

Andrew and Frederick II, Duke of Austria, signed a peace treaty in late 1233.[146] Andrew, who had been widowed, married the 23-year-old Beatrice d'Este on 14 May 1234, even though his sons were sharply opposed to his third marriage.[148] John, Bishop of Bosnia, put Hungary under a new interdict in the first half of 1234, because Andrew had not dismissed his non-Christian officials despite his oath of Bereg.[149][150] Andrew and Archbishop Robert of Esztergom protested against the bishop's act at the Holy See.[149]

Last years (1234–1235)

[edit]

Danilo Romanovich laid siege to Halych, and Andrew's youngest son died during the siege in the autumn of 1234.[150] However, Andrew stormed Austria in the summer of 1235, forcing Duke Frederick to pay an indemnification for damages that his troops had caused while raiding Hungary.[150] Upon Andrew's demand, Pope Gregory declared on 31 August that Andrew and his sons could only be excommunicated by the authorization of the Holy See.[150] Andrew died on 21 September,[151] and was buried in Egres Abbey.[152]

Family

[edit]

Andrew's first wife, Gertrude of Merania, was born around 1185, according to historian Gyula Kristó.[157] Their first child, Mary, was born in 1203 or 1204. She became the wife of Ivan Asen II of Bulgaria.[158] Andrew's eldest son, Béla, was born in 1206. He later succeeded his father as king.[158] Béla's younger sister, Elisabeth, was born in 1207. She married Louis IV, Landgrave of Thuringia.[158] She died in 1231 and was canonized during Andrew's life.[159] Andrew's second son, Coloman, was born in 1208. His third son, Andrew, was born around 1210. Coloman and Andrew each ruled the Principality of Halych for a short period.[158]

Two years after his first wife was murdered, Andrew married Yolanda de Courtenay, who was born around 1198.[160] Their only child, Yolanda, was born around 1219 and married James I of Aragon.[161] Andrew's third wife, Beatrice d'Este, was about twenty-three when they married in 1234.[162] She gave birth to a son, Stephen, after Andrew's death.[163] However, Andrew's two older sons, Béla and Coloman, accused her of adultery and considered her child to be a bastard.[164] Her grandson, Andrew, became the last monarch of the House of Árpád.[164]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ In older historiography, Raynald was described as the son of Geoffrey, Count of Gien, but in 1989 Jean Richard demonstrated Raynald's kinship with the Lords of Donzy (Hamilton 2000, p. 104.)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Kontler 1999, p. 75.
  2. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 229, Appendix 4.
  3. ^ Kristó 1994, p. 43.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Almási 2012, p. 86.
  5. ^ Zsoldos 2022, pp. 13–14.
  6. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 229.
  7. ^ Dimnik 2003, p. 191.
  8. ^ a b c Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 224.
  9. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 191, 193.
  10. ^ a b c d e Dimnik 2003, p. 193.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 127.
  12. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 54.
  13. ^ a b Dimnik 2003, pp. 193–194.
  14. ^ Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 122.
  15. ^ Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 249.
  16. ^ a b Zsoldos 2022, p. 19.
  17. ^ Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 234.
  18. ^ a b Bartl et al. 2002, p. 30.
  19. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 124.
  20. ^ a b c d Curta 2006, p. 347.
  21. ^ a b Zsoldos 2022, pp. 20–21.
  22. ^ Fine 1994, p. 22.
  23. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 24.
  24. ^ Zsoldos 2022, pp. 22–24.
  25. ^ Curta 2006, p. 370.
  26. ^ Fine 1994, p. 52.
  27. ^ Bárány 2012, p. 132.
  28. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 31.
  29. ^ Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, pp. 124–125.
  30. ^ a b c d e Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 125.
  31. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 32.
  32. ^ a b c Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 230.
  33. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 126.
  34. ^ a b Zsoldos 2022, pp. 36–37.
  35. ^ Archdeacon Thomas of Split: History of the Bishops of Salona and Split (ch. 23.), pp. 141–143.
  36. ^ a b c d e Engel 2001, p. 89.
  37. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 38.
  38. ^ Archdeacon Thomas of Split: History of the Bishops of Salona and Split (ch. 23.), p. 143.
  39. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 227, 231.
  40. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 39.
  41. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 40.
  42. ^ Zsoldos 2022, p. 41.
  43. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 227–228.
  44. ^ Zsoldos 2022, pp. 48–49.
  45. ^ Bartl et al. 2002, p. 31.
  46. ^ a b c d Engel 2001, p. 91.
  47. ^ a b c Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 427.
  48. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 91–92.
  49. ^ Engel 2001, p. 93.
  50. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 251–253.
  51. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 253–254.
  52. ^ a b Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 441.
  53. ^ Curta 2006, p. 317.
  54. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 254–255, 258.
  55. ^ a b c d Dimnik 2003, p. 263.
  56. ^ The Hypatian Codex II: The Galician-Volynian Chronicle (year 1207), p. 19.
  57. ^ Bárány 2012, p. 136.
  58. ^ a b c d e Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 128.
  59. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 263–264.
  60. ^ Dimnik 2003, p. 264.
  61. ^ The Hypatian Codex II: The Galician-Volynian Chronicle (year 1210), p. 20.
  62. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 233.
  63. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 90–91.
  64. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 232–233.
  65. ^ a b c Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 428.
  66. ^ Almási 2012, p. 88.
  67. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 232–234.
  68. ^ Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 9), p. 27.
  69. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 234.
  70. ^ a b Magaš 2007, p. 58.
  71. ^ Fine 1994, p. 149.
  72. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 129.
  73. ^ a b c d Dimnik 2003, p. 266.
  74. ^ The Hypatian Codex II: The Galician-Volynian Chronicle (year 1211), p. 20.
  75. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 236.
  76. ^ Curta 2006, p. 385.
  77. ^ Spinei 2009, p. 145.
  78. ^ Fine 1994, p. 102.
  79. ^ a b c d e f g Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 131.
  80. ^ Spinei 2009, pp. 145–146.
  81. ^ Kroonen et al. 2014, p. 243.
  82. ^ Engel 2001, p. 90.
  83. ^ Curta 2006, p. 404.
  84. ^ a b c d e f g h Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 130.
  85. ^ Dimnik 2003, p. 272.
  86. ^ a b c Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 429.
  87. ^ a b c d e f g Engel 2001, p. 94.
  88. ^ Almási 2012, p. 89.
  89. ^ Engel 2001, p. 92.
  90. ^ Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, pp. 427–428.
  91. ^ a b Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 132.
  92. ^ a b c Bárány 2012, p. 143.
  93. ^ a b Fine 1994, pp. 105–106.
  94. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 108.
  95. ^ Bárány 2013, p. 462.
  96. ^ a b c d Van Cleve 1969, p. 387.
  97. ^ a b c Runciman 1989b, p. 146.
  98. ^ Almási 2012, p. 87.
  99. ^ Bárány 2013, p. 463-465.
  100. ^ Almási 2012, pp. 87–88.
  101. ^ Bárány 2013, p. 463.
  102. ^ a b Van Cleve 1969, pp. 387–388.
  103. ^ a b c d Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 133.
  104. ^ Runciman 1989b, pp. 147–148.
  105. ^ Richard 1999, p. 297.
  106. ^ Sterns 1985, p. 358.
  107. ^ Van Cleve 1969, p. 390.
  108. ^ Runciman 1989b, p. 148.
  109. ^ a b c d e Van Cleve 1969, p. 393.
  110. ^ a b Runciman 1989b, pp. 148–149.
  111. ^ a b Archdeacon Thomas of Split: History of the Bishops of Salona and Split (ch. 25.), p. 165.
  112. ^ Richard 1999, p. 298.
  113. ^ Van Cleve 1969, pp. 388, 393.
  114. ^ a b c d Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 238.
  115. ^ Bárány 2012, p. 148.
  116. ^ Fine 1994, p. 129.
  117. ^ a b Van Cleve 1969, p. 394.
  118. ^ Donnachie, Stephen. "review of 'Curia and Crusade: Pope Honorius III and the Recovery of the Holy Land, 1216–1227'", (review no. 2259)doi:10.14296/RiH/2014/2259 Date accessed: 4 January 2020
  119. ^ a b Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 134.
  120. ^ Dimnik 2003, pp. 289–290.
  121. ^ Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, p. 425.
  122. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 96–97.
  123. ^ a b Berend 2006, p. 152.
  124. ^ Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 135.
  125. ^ Bartl et al. 2002, pp. 30–31.
  126. ^ a b Bárány 2012, p. 150.
  127. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 85, 94.
  128. ^ Berend, Urbańczyk & Wiszewski 2013, pp. 428–429.
  129. ^ Ertman 1997, p. 273.
  130. ^ Ertman 1997, pp. 273–4.
  131. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 137.
  132. ^ a b Bárány 2012, p. 151.
  133. ^ a b Curta 2006, p. 403.
  134. ^ Engel 2001, p. 114.
  135. ^ Spinei 2009, p. 147.
  136. ^ a b c d e f Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 138.
  137. ^ Curta 2006, pp. 405–405.
  138. ^ Engel 2001, p. 95.
  139. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 139.
  140. ^ Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 140.
  141. ^ Berend 2006, p. 155.
  142. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 141.
  143. ^ Berend 2006, pp. 154–155.
  144. ^ a b Berend 2006, p. 157.
  145. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 142.
  146. ^ a b c Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 143.
  147. ^ Berend 2006, pp. 158–159.
  148. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 243.
  149. ^ a b Berend 2006, p. 160.
  150. ^ a b c d Érszegi & Solymosi 1981, p. 144.
  151. ^ Engel 2001, p. 98.
  152. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 244.
  153. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 229, Appendices 2–4.
  154. ^ Runciman 1989a, p. 345, Appendix III.
  155. ^ Hamilton 2000, p. 104.
  156. ^ Dimnik 1994, pp. 85, 95.
  157. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 231.
  158. ^ a b c d Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 232, Appendix 4.
  159. ^ Engel 2001, p. 97.
  160. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 236–237.
  161. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. Appendix 4.
  162. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 243, Appendix 4.
  163. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 243, 282, Appendix 4.
  164. ^ a b Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 282.

Sources

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]
  • Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (Edited, Translated and Annotated by Martyn Rady and László Veszprémy) (2010). In: Rady, Martyn; Veszprémy, László; Bak, János M. (2010); Anonymus and Master Roger; CEU Press; ISBN 978-963-9776-95-1.
  • Archdeacon Thomas of Split: History of the Bishops of Salona and Split (Latin text by Olga Perić, edited, translated and annotated by Damir Karbić, Mirjana Matijević Sokol and James Ross Sweeney) (2006). CEU Press. ISBN 963-7326-59-6.
  • The Hypatian Codex II: The Galician-Volynian Chronicle (An annotated translation by George A. Perfecky) (1973). Wilhelm Fink Verlag. LCCN 72-79463.

Secondary sources

[edit]
  • Almási, Tibor (2012). "II. András". In Gujdár, Noémi; Szatmáry, Nóra (eds.). Magyar királyok nagykönyve: Uralkodóink, kormányzóink és az erdélyi fejedelmek életének és tetteinek képes története [Encyclopedia of the Kings of Hungary: An Illustrated History of the Life and Deeds of Our Monarchs, Regents and the Princes of Transylvania] (in Hungarian). Reader's Digest. pp. 86–89. ISBN 978-963-289-214-6.
  • Bain, Robert Nisbet (1911). "Andrew II" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 1 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 967–968.
  • Bárány, Attila (2012). "II. András balkáni külpolitikája [Andrew II's foreign policy in the Balkans]". In Kerny, Terézia; Smohay, András (eds.). II. András and Székesfehérvár [Andrew II and Székesfehérvár] (in Hungarian). Székesfehérvári Egyházmegyei Múzeum. pp. 129–173. ISBN 978-963-87898-4-6.
  • Bárány, Attila (2013). "II. András és a Latin Császárság [Andrew II and the Latin Empire of Constantinople]". Hadtörténelmi Közlemények (in Hungarian). 126 (2): 461–480. ISSN 0017-6540.
  • Bárány, Attila (2020). "The Relations of King Emeric and Andrew II of Hungary with the Balkan States". Stefan the First-Crowned and His Time. Belgrade: Institute of History. pp. 213–249. ISBN 9788677431396.
  • Bartl, Július; Čičaj, Viliam; Kohútova, Mária; Letz, Róbert; Segeš, Vladimír; Škvarna, Dušan (2002). Slovak History: Chronology & Lexicon. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Slovenské Pedegogické Nakladatel'stvo. ISBN 0-86516-444-4.
  • Berend, Nora (2006). At the Gate of Christendom: Jews, Muslims and "Pagans" in Medieval Hungary, c. 1000–c.1300. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-02720-5.
  • Berend, Nora; Urbańczyk, Przemysław; Wiszewski, Przemysław (2013). Central Europe in the High Middle Ages: Bohemia, Hungary and Poland, c. 900-c. 1300. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-78156-5.
  • Curta, Florin (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89452-4.
  • Dimnik, Martin (1994). The Dynasty of Chernigov, 1054–1146. Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies. ISBN 0-88844-116-9.
  • Dimnik, Martin (2003). The Dynasty of Chernigov, 1146–1246. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-03981-9.
  • Engel, Pál (2001). The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. I.B. Tauris Publishers. ISBN 1-86064-061-3.
  • Érszegi, Géza; Solymosi, László (1981). "Az Árpádok királysága, 1000–1301 [The Monarchy of the Árpáds, 1000–1301]". In Solymosi, László (ed.). Magyarország történeti kronológiája, I: a kezdetektől 1526-ig [Historical Chronology of Hungary, Volume I: From the Beginning to 1526] (in Hungarian). Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 79–187. ISBN 963-05-2661-1.
  • Ertman, Thomas (1997). Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521484275.
  • Fine, John V. A. Jr. (1994) [1987]. The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-08260-4.
  • Hamilton, Bernard (2000). The Leper King and His Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64187-6.
  • Kontler, László (1999). Millennium in Central Europe: A History of Hungary. Atlantisz Publishing House. ISBN 963-9165-37-9.
  • Kristó, Gyula (1994). "II. András". In Kristó, Gyula; Engel, Pál; Makk, Ferenc (eds.). Korai magyar történeti lexikon (9–14. század) [Encyclopedia of the Early Hungarian History (9th–14th centuries)] (in Hungarian). Akadémiai Kiadó. p. 43. ISBN 963-05-6722-9.
  • Kristó, Gyula; Makk, Ferenc (1996). Az Árpád-ház uralkodói [Rulers of the House of Árpád] (in Hungarian). I.P.C. Könyvek. ISBN 963-7930-97-3.
  • Kroonen, Guus; Langbroek, Erika; Quak, Arend; Roeleveld, Annelies, eds. (2014). Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik. Vol. 72. Editions Rodopi.
  • Magaš, Branka (2007). Croatia Through History. SAQI. ISBN 978-0-86356-775-9.
  • Richard, Jean (1999). The Crusades, c. 1071–c. 1291. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-62566-1.
  • Runciman, Steven (1989) [1952]. A History of the Crusades, Volume II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-06162-8.
  • Runciman, Steven (1989) [1954]. A History of the Crusades, Volume III: The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-06163-6.
  • Spinei, Victor (2009). The Romanians and the Turkic Nomads North of the Danube Delta from the Tenth to the Mid-Thirteenth century. Koninklijke Brill NV. ISBN 978-90-04-17536-5.
  • Sterns, Indrikis (1985). "The Teutonic Knights in the Crusader States". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Zacour, Norman P.; Hazard, Harry (eds.). A History of the Crusades, Volume V: The Impact of the Crusades on the Near East. The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 315–378. ISBN 0-299-09140-6.
  • Van Cleve, Thomas C. (1969). "The Fifth Crusade". In Setton, Kenneth M.; Wolff, Robert Lee; Hazard, Harry (eds.). A History of the Crusades, Volume II: The Later Crusades, 1189–1311. The University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 377–428. ISBN 0-299-04844-6.
  • Zsoldos, Attila (2022). Az Aranybulla királya [The King of the Golden Bull] (in Hungarian). Városi Levéltár és Kutatóintézet. ISBN 978-963-8406-26-2.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Andrew II of Hungary.
Andrew II of Hungary
Born: c. 1177 Died: 21 September 1235
Regnal titles
Preceded by Prince of Halych
1188–1189 or 1190 		Succeeded by
Preceded by King of Hungary and Croatia
1205–1235 		Succeeded by
Preceded by King of Halych
1208 or 1209–1210 		Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_II_of_Hungary&oldid=1262243495"