Bob Fischer (philosopher)

Bob Fischer
Born
Robert William Fischer
Education
OccupationProfessor
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionUnited States
InstitutionsTexas State University
ThesisModal Knowledge, in Theory (2011)
Doctoral advisorW. D. Hart
Main interests
Epistemology; ethics
Notable ideas
Theory-Based Epistemology of Modality
Websitewww.bobfischer.net

Bob Fischer is an American philosopher who specializes in epistemology (especially modal epistemology) and ethics (especially animal ethics). He is a Professor of Philosophy at Texas State University and a Senior Research Manager at Rethink Priorities. His books include Modal Justification via Theories (in which he defends his account of "Theory-Based Epistemology of Modality"), The Ethics of Eating Animals, and Weighing Animal Welfare.

Education and career

[edit]

Fischer earned a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy and English at State University of New York at Geneseo from 2001 to 2004.[1] He received a PhD in philosophy at the University of Illinois Chicago.[1] He submitted his doctoral thesis, which was entitled Modal Knowledge, in Theory, in 2011. His advisor (and thesis committee chair) was W. D. Hart; the other committee members were Colin Klein, Walter Edelberg, Daniel Sutherland, and Karen Bennett.[2]

From Illinois, he moved to Texas State University, first (2011–2013) as a Senior Lecturer, and subsequently as an Assistant Professor of Philosophy (2013–19), an Associate Professor of Philosophy (2019–2024),[1] and Professor of Philosophy (2024-present).[citation needed] Fischer is a Senior Research Manager at Rethink Priorities[3] and, along with Mark Budolfson and Lisa Kramer, a director of the Animal Welfare Economics Working Group.[4]

Research

[edit]

Fischer's first sole-authored monograph was Modal Justification via Theories,[5] in which he defends a "Theory-Based Epistemology of Modality". According to this account, agents can have a justified belief in modal claims about certain kinds of "extraordinary" matters (e.g., philosophical issues) only if the claim follows from a theory in which they have a justified belief. Key to Fischer's account is that abductive reasoning (such as appeals to the virtue of simplicity) is well-placed to help agents to identify the theories that they are justified in believing.[6] The epistemologists Antonella Mallozzi, Anand Vaidya, and Michael Wallner give the example of mind-body dualism. On Fischer's Theory-Based Epistemology of Modality, "we are justified in believing that mind-body dualism is metaphysically possible only if we are justified in believing a theory T from which mind-body dualism follows", but if T "is not the simplest theory, all else being equal, then one would not be justified in believing it, and thus not be justified in believing that mind-body dualism is metaphysically possible".[6]

In 2024, Fischer published Weighing Animal Welfare, which collects the research that he and his team did from 2021-2023 on interspecies welfare comparisons. Interspecies welfare comparisons involve estimating the relative well-being levels of members of different species. For instance, if someone judges that a chicken in a battery cage is worse off than a human living a normal life, that person is making an interspecies welfare comparison. The book shows how it may be possible to make such comparisons by finding a mix of behavioral and physiological proxies for possible differences in the intensities of valenced experiences (like pleasure and pain). It then reports the results of applying that methodology.[citation needed]

Selected publications

[edit]
Monographs
  • Fischer, Bob (2017). Modal Justification via Theories. Springer.
  • Fischer, Bob (2020). The Ethics of Eating Animals: Usually Bad, Sometimes Wrong, Often Permissible. Routledge.[7][8]
Debate books
  • Jauernig, Anja, and Bob Fischer (2024). What Do We Owe Other Animals? A Debate. Routledge.
Textbooks
  • Fischer, Bob (2021). Animal Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.[9]
  • Palmer, Clare, Bob Fischer, Christian Gamborg, Jordan Hampton, and Peter Sandøe (2023). Wildlife Ethics: The Ethics of Wildlife Management and Conservation. Wiley.
Edited books
  • Bramble, Ben, and Bob Fischer (eds.) (2015). The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press.[10]
  • Fischer, Bob, and Felipe Leon (eds.) (2017). Modal Epistemology After Rationalism. Springer.
  • Fischer, Bob (ed.) (2017). College Ethics: A Reader on Moral Issues That Affect You. Oxford University Press.[11]
    • Second edition published 2020.
  • Fischer, Bob (ed.) (2020). The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics. Routledge.[12]
  • Fischer, Bob (ed.) (2020). Ethics, Left and Right: The Moral Issues That Divide Us. Oxford University Press.
  • Weston, Anthony, and Bob Fischer (eds.) (2023). A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, Bob (ed.) (2024). Weighing Animal Welfare: Comparing Well-being Across Species. Oxford University Press.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Fischer, Bob (2021). "Bob Fischer's CV". Texas State University. Archived from the original on 2023-06-17. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  2. ^ Fischer, Robert William (2011). Modal Knowledge, in Theory (Thesis). University of Chicago at Illinois.
  3. ^ "Rethink Priorities' Worldview Investigation Team: Introductions and Next Steps". Rethink Priorities. 21 June 2023. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  4. ^ https://www.aw-econ.org/about
  5. ^ Reviews:
  6. ^ a b Mallozzi, Antonella; Vaidya, Anand; Wallner, Michael (7 July 2023). "The Epistemology of Modality". In Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  7. ^ Milburn, Josh (19 April 2021). "Knowing Animals 164: Is veganism morally required? With Bob Fischer". Knowing Animals (Podcast). Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  8. ^ Reviews:
    • Bernstein, Justin; Anne Barnhill (2021). "Fischer, Bob. The Ethics of Eating Animals". Ethics. 131 (3): 605–10. doi:10.1086/712575.
  9. ^ Reviews:
  10. ^ Reviews:
  11. ^ Reviews:
  12. ^ Reviews:
[edit]