Convexity in economics

Part of a series on
Economics
History Outline Index
Branches and classifications Applied Econometrics Heterodox International Micro / Macro Mainstream Mathematical Methodology Political JEL classification codes
Concepts, theory and techniques Economic systems Economic growth Market National accounting Experimental economics Computational economics Game theory Operations research Middle income trap Industrial complex
By application Agricultural Behavioral Business Cultural Democracy Demographic Development Digitization Ecological Education Engineering Environmental Evolutionary Expeditionary Feminist Financial Geographical Happiness Health Historical Humanistic Industrial organization Information Institutional Knowledge Labour Law Managerial Monetary Natural resource Organizational Participation Personnel Planning Policy Public Public choice / Social choice theory Regional Rural Service Socio Sociological Solidarity Statistics Urban Welfare
Notable economists de Mandeville Quesnay Smith Malthus Say Ricardo von Thünen List Bastiat Cournot Mill Gossen Marx Walras Jevons George Menger Marshall Edgeworth Clark Pareto von Böhm-Bawerk von Wieser Veblen Fisher Pigou Heckscher von Mises Schumpeter Keynes Knight Polanyi Frisch Sraffa Myrdal Hayek Kalecki Röpke Kuznets Tinbergen Robinson von Neumann Hicks Lange Leontief Galbraith Koopmans Schumacher Friedman Samuelson Simon Buchanan Arrow Baumol Solow Rothbard Greenspan Sowell Becker Ostrom Sen Lucas Stiglitz Thaler Hoppe Krugman Piketty more
Lists Glossary Economists Publications (journals) Schools
Business portal Money portal
v t e

Convexity is a geometric property with a variety of applications in economics.^[1] Informally, an economic phenomenon is convex when "intermediates (or combinations) are better than extremes". For example, an economic agent with convex preferences prefers combinations of goods over having a lot of any one sort of good; this represents a kind of diminishing marginal utility of having more of the same good.

Convexity is a key simplifying assumption in many economic models, as it leads to market behavior that is easy to understand and which has desirable properties. For example, the Arrow–Debreu model of general economic equilibrium posits that if preferences are convex and there is perfect competition, then aggregate supplies will equal aggregate demands for every commodity in the economy.

In contrast, non-convexity is associated with market failures, where supply and demand differ or where market equilibria can be inefficient.

The branch of mathematics which supplies the tools for convex functions and their properties is called convex analysis; non-convex phenomena are studied under nonsmooth analysis.

This section may contain material not related to the topic of the article and should be moved to convex analysis instead. Please help improve this section or discuss this issue on the talk page. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The economics depends upon the following definitions and results from convex geometry.

A convex set covers the line segment connecting any two of its points.

A non‑convex set fails to cover a point in some line segment joining two of its points.

Line segments test convexity.

A real vector space of two dimensions may be given a Cartesian coordinate system in which every point is identified by a list of two real numbers, called "coordinates", which are conventionally denoted by x and y. Two points in the Cartesian plane can be added coordinate-wise

(x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂) = (x₁+x₂, y₁+y₂);

further, a point can be multiplied by each real number λ coordinate-wise

λ (x, y) = (λx, λy).

More generally, any real vector space of (finite) dimension D can be viewed as the set of all possible lists of D real numbers { (v₁, v₂, . . . , v_D) } together with two operations: vector addition and multiplication by a real number. For finite-dimensional vector spaces, the operations of vector addition and real-number multiplication can each be defined coordinate-wise, following the example of the Cartesian plane.

In a real vector space, a set is defined to be convex if, for each pair of its points, every point on the line segment that joins them is covered by the set. For example, a solid cube is convex; however, anything that is hollow or dented, for example, a crescent shape, is non‑convex. Trivially, the empty set is convex.

More formally, a set Q is convex if, for all points v₀ and v₁ in Q and for every real number λ in the unit interval [0,1], the point

(1 − λ) v₀ + λv₁

is a member of Q.

By mathematical induction, a set Q is convex if and only if every convex combination of members of Q also belongs to Q. By definition, a convex combination of an indexed subset {v₀, v₁, . . . , v_D} of a vector space is any weighted average λ₀v₀ + λ₁v₁ + . . . + λ_Dv_D, for some indexed set of non‑negative real numbers {λ_d} satisfying the equation λ₀ + λ₁ + . . . + λ_D = 1.

The definition of a convex set implies that the intersection of two convex sets is a convex set. More generally, the intersection of a family of convex sets is a convex set.

For every subset Q of a real vector space, its convex hull Conv(Q) is the minimal convex set that contains Q. Thus Conv(Q) is the intersection of all the convex sets that cover Q. The convex hull of a set can be equivalently defined to be the set of all convex combinations of points in Q.

Supporting hyperplane is a concept in geometry. A hyperplane divides a space into two half-spaces. A hyperplane is said to support a set ${\displaystyle S}$ in the real n-space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ if it meets both of the following:

• ${\displaystyle S}$ is entirely contained in one of the two closed half-spaces determined by the hyperplane
• ${\displaystyle S}$ has at least one point on the hyperplane.

Here, a closed half-space is the half-space that includes the hyperplane.

This theorem states that if ${\displaystyle S}$ is a closed convex set in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n},}$ and ${\displaystyle x}$ is a point on the boundary of ${\displaystyle S,}$ then there exists a supporting hyperplane containing ${\displaystyle x.}$

The hyperplane in the theorem may not be unique, as noticed in the second picture on the right. If the closed set ${\displaystyle S}$ is not convex, the statement of the theorem is not true at all points on the boundary of ${\displaystyle S,}$ as illustrated in the third picture on the right.

An optimal basket of goods occurs where the consumer's convex preference set is supported by the budget constraint, as shown in the diagram. If the preference set is convex, then the consumer's set of optimal decisions is a convex set, for example, a unique optimal basket (or even a line segment of optimal baskets).

For simplicity, we shall assume that the preferences of a consumer can be described by a utility function that is a continuous function, which implies that the preference sets are closed. (The meanings of "closed set" is explained below, in the subsection on optimization applications.)

If a preference set is non‑convex, then some prices produce a budget supporting two different optimal consumption decisions. For example, we can imagine that, for zoos, a lion costs as much as an eagle, and further that a zoo's budget suffices for one eagle or one lion. We can suppose also that a zoo-keeper views either animal as equally valuable. In this case, the zoo would purchase either one lion or one eagle. Of course, a contemporary zoo-keeper does not want to purchase a half an eagle and a half a lion (or a griffin)! Thus, the contemporary zoo-keeper's preferences are non‑convex: The zoo-keeper prefers having either animal to having any strictly convex combination of both.

Non‑convex sets have been incorporated in the theories of general economic equilibria,^[2] of market failures,^[3] and of public economics.^[4] These results are described in graduate-level textbooks in microeconomics,^[5] general equilibrium theory,^[6] game theory,^[7] mathematical economics,^[8] and applied mathematics (for economists).^[9] The Shapley–Folkman lemma results establish that non‑convexities are compatible with approximate equilibria in markets with many consumers; these results also apply to production economies with many small firms.^[10]

In "oligopolies" (markets dominated by a few producers), especially in "monopolies" (markets dominated by one producer), non‑convexities remain important.^[11] Concerns with large producers exploiting market power in fact initiated the literature on non‑convex sets, when Piero Sraffa wrote about on firms with increasing returns to scale in 1926,^[12] after which Harold Hotelling wrote about marginal cost pricing in 1938.^[13] Both Sraffa and Hotelling illuminated the market power of producers without competitors, clearly stimulating a literature on the supply-side of the economy.^[14] Non‑convex sets arise also with environmental goods (and other externalities),^[15][16] with information economics,^[17] and with stock markets^[11] (and other incomplete markets).^[18][19] Such applications continued to motivate economists to study non‑convex sets.^[20]

This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Relationship between subderivatives and non‑convexity remains cryptic. Please help improve this section if you can. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Economists have increasingly studied non‑convex sets with nonsmooth analysis, which generalizes convex analysis. "Non‑convexities in [both] production and consumption ... required mathematical tools that went beyond convexity, and further development had to await the invention of non‑smooth calculus" (for example, Francis Clarke's locally Lipschitz calculus), as described by Rockafellar & Wets (1998)^[21] and Mordukhovich (2006),^[22] according to Khan (2008).^[23] Brown (1991, pp. 1967–1968) wrote that the "major methodological innovation in the general equilibrium analysis of firms with pricing rules" was "the introduction of the methods of non‑smooth analysis, as a [synthesis] of global analysis (differential topology) and [of] convex analysis." According to Brown (1991, p. 1966), "Non‑smooth analysis extends the local approximation of manifolds by tangent planes [and extends] the analogous approximation of convex sets by tangent cones to sets" that can be non‑smooth or non‑convex.^[24] Economists have also used algebraic topology.^[25]

• Convex duality

• Blume, Lawrence E. (2008a). "Convexity". In Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E (eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Second ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 225–226. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0315. ISBN 978-0-333-78676-5.
• Blume, Lawrence E. (2008b). "Convex programming". In Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E (eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Second ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 220–225. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0314. ISBN 978-0-333-78676-5.
• Blume, Lawrence E. (2008c). "Duality". In Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E (eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Second ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 551–555. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0411. ISBN 978-0-333-78676-5.
• Crouzeix, J.-P. (2008). "Quasi-concavity". In Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E (eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Second ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 815–816. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1375. ISBN 978-0-333-78676-5.
• Diewert, W. E. (1982). "12 Duality approaches to microeconomic theory". In Arrow, Kenneth Joseph; Intriligator, Michael D (eds.). Handbook of mathematical economics, Volume II. Handbooks in economics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. pp. 535–599. doi:10.1016/S1573-4382(82)02007-4. ISBN 978-0-444-86127-6. MR 0648778.
• Green, Jerry; Heller, Walter P. (1981). "1 Mathematical analysis and convexity with applications to economics". In Arrow, Kenneth Joseph; Intriligator, Michael D (eds.). Handbook of mathematical economics, Volume I. Handbooks in economics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. pp. 15–52. doi:10.1016/S1573-4382(81)01005-9. ISBN 978-0-444-86126-9. MR 0634800.
• Luenberger, David G. Microeconomic Theory, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1995.
• Mas-Colell, A. (1987). "Non‑convexity" (PDF). In Eatwell, John; Milgate, Murray; Newman, Peter (eds.). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (first ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 653–661. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.3173. ISBN 9780333786765.
• Newman, Peter (1987c). "Convexity". In Eatwell, John; Milgate, Murray; Newman, Peter (eds.). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (first ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 1. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.2282. ISBN 9780333786765.
• Newman, Peter (1987d). "Duality". In Eatwell, John; Milgate, Murray; Newman, Peter (eds.). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (first ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. p. 1. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.2412. ISBN 9780333786765.
• Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell (1997). Convex analysis. Princeton landmarks in mathematics (Reprint of the 1979 Princeton mathematical series 28 ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-01586-6. MR 0274683..
• Schneider, Rolf (1993). Convex bodies: The Brunn–Minkowski theory. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications. Vol. 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. xiv+490. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526282 (inactive 1 November 2024). ISBN 978-0-521-35220-8. MR 1216521.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)