1986 United States Supreme Court case
Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc. Full case name Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc. Docket no. 85-701 Citations 479 U.S. 238 (more ) Massachusetts Citizens for Life violated the Federal Election Campaign Act by distributing flyers asking voters to vote "for life" paid for with treasury funds, however that section of FECA itself violated the First Amendment. Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · John P. Stevens Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia Majority Brennan (Parts I and II), joined by unanimous Majority Brennan (Parts III–B and III–C), joined by Marshall, Powell, O'Connor, Scalia Plurality Brennan (Part III–A), joined by Marshall, Powell, Scalia Concurrence O'Connor (in part and in judgment) Concur/dissent Rehnquist, joined by White, Blackmun, Stevens U.S. Const. amend. I
FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life was a lawsuit filed by the US Federal Election Commission .
Massachusetts Citizens for Life [ edit ] Massachusetts Citizens for Life was a nonprofit corporation, aiming to "defend the right to life of all human beings born and unborn," with advocacy activities.
It published a newsletter. In September, 1978, Massachusetts Citizens for Life distributed a "Special Edition" telling people to vote "pro-life" in the primary elections. It listed candidates for every office in every voting district in Massachusetts, and labeled each candidate as supporting or rejecting their views. The publication was distributed to a larger audience than that of the standard newsletter (the general public, not just supporters). It was financed by money taken from Massachusetts Citizens for Life's general treasury funds.
A Federal Election Commission complaint was filed.[who? ] Claiming the "Special Edition" violated § 316; funds used from a corporate treasury to distribute a campaign flyer (of certain political candidates) toward the general public. The FEC determined probable cause of a violation of the statute. The FEC then led a complaint in Federal District Court .[ 1]
In Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc. , 479 U.S. 238 (1986), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc., a pro-life organization,[ 2] violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) by distributing flyers asking voters to vote "for life" paid for with treasury funds. The court also ruled that the FECA section that required corporate spending on political campaigns be done through political action committees (PACs) was itself a violation of the First Amendment rights.[ 3] [ 4]
^ FEC v. Mass. Cit. for Life, 479 U.S. 238 (1986). ^ McDonald, Matt (August 28, 2022). "Diehl Is Choice For Governor of Massachusetts Pro-Life Group; All The MCFL PAC Endorsements" . NewBostonPost . Retrieved May 27, 2023 . ^ Wermiel, Stephen (December 16, 1986). "High Court Overturns Law Requiring Nonprofit Political Groups to Use PACs" . Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition . p. 4. Retrieved May 16, 2017 – via ProQuest. ^ "Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc" . Oyez. Retrieved May 16, 2017 .
Public displays and ceremonies Statutory religious exemptions Public funding Religion in public schools Private religious speech Internal church affairs Taxpayer standing Blue laws Other
Unprotected speech
Incitement and sedition Defamation andfalse speech Fighting words and the heckler's veto True threats Obscenity Rosen v. United States (1896) United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (S.D.N.Y. 1933) Roth v. United States (1957) One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958) Smith v. California (1959) Marcus v. Search Warrant (1961) MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day (1962) Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964) Quantity of Books v. Kansas (1964) Ginzburg v. United States (1966) Memoirs v. Massachusetts (1966) Redrup v. New York (1967) Ginsberg v. New York (1968) Stanley v. Georgia (1969) United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs (1971) Kois v. Wisconsin (1972) Miller v. California (1973) Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (1973) United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film (1973) Jenkins v. Georgia (1974) Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad (1975) Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville (1975) Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. (1976) Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc. (1980) American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut (7th Cir. 1985) People v. Freeman (Cal. 1988) United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (1994) Reno v. ACLU (1997) United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (2000) City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. (2002) Ashcroft v. ACLU I (2002) United States v. American Library Ass'n (2003) Ashcroft v. ACLU II (2004) Nitke v. Gonzales (S.D.N.Y. 2005) United States v. Williams (2008) American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland (6th Cir. 2009) United States v. Kilbride (9th Cir. 2009) United States v. Stevens (2010) Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n (2011) FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (2025) Speech integral to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny Overbreadth Vagueness Symbolic speech versus conductContent-based restrictions Content-neutral restrictions
Compelled speech Compelled subsidy of others' speech
Government grants and subsidies Government as speaker Loyalty oaths School speech Public employees Hatch Act and similar lawsLicensing and restriction of speech Commercial speech Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942) Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept. (1970) Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations (1973) Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974) Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (1975) Bigelow v. Virginia (1975) Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976) Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro (1977) Carey v. Population Services International (1977) Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977) In re Primus (1978) Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (1978) Friedman v. Rogers (1979) Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n (1980) Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1980) Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego (1981) In re R.M.J. (1982) Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982) Zauderer v. Off. of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985) Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California (1986) Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico (1986) San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. U.S. Olympic Committee (1987) Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association (1988) Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind (1988) State University of New York v. Fox (1989) Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois (1990) City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network (1993) Edenfield v. Fane (1993) United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co. (1993) Ibanez v. Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, Bd. of Accountancy (1994) Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (1995) Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co. (1995) Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. (1995) 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996) Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc. (1997) Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States (1999) Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Co. (1999) United States v. United Foods Inc. (2001) Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (2001) Thompson v. Western States Medical Center (2002) Nike, Inc. v. Kasky (2003) Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n (2005) Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy (2007) Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States (2010) Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA (2010) Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. (2011) Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (2017) Matal v. Tam (2017) Iancu v. Brunetti (2019) Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (2020) Vidal v. Elster (2024) Campaign finance and political speechAnonymous speech State action Official retaliation Boycotts Prisons
Organizations Future Conduct Solicitation Membership restriction Primaries and elections