Key type stamp

An unused Trinidad key type stamp showing Britannia
A used German key type stamp for Togo
An 1892 4c stamp for Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) of the Navigation & Commerce key type series
These mint British stamps for use in Ceylon exemplify the key plate approach.

Key type stamps are stamps of a uniform design that were widely used by colonial territories in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Origins

[edit]

The idea was invented by Perkins Bacon who used it to print stamps for Trinidad (1851), Barbados (1852) and Mauritius (1858), all featuring the same Britannia design.

Key plate stamps

[edit]

The idea was refined by De La Rue in 1879 when the printing process was split into two through the use of a key plate (or head plate) for the bulk of the design and a separate duty plate for the name of the colony and the value.[1] These are often known as key plate stamps. While key type stamps are always of one colour due to being printed with a single plate, key plate stamps are printed with two plates and so can be printed with two different inks. This method has the advantage that most of the design remains the same in each variant of a stamp series with only the values, names and colours changing.

Key plate stamps were used extensively by Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain and Portugal.[2]

Revenues

[edit]

Key plates were also a ubiquitous feature of revenue stamps of Burma/Myanmar, Great Britain, India, Ireland, Malta and Pakistan. These had a tablet at the bottom, and this was appropriated (overprinted to indicate the type of use), e.g. Consular Service, Contract Note, Notarial, Special Adhesive, Stocks & Shares. Malta was the only country to also issue unappropriated stamps (with the bottom tablet still blank).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Mackay, James. Stamp Collecting: Philatelic Terms Illustrated. 4th edition. London: Stanley Gibbons, 2003, p.76. ISBN 0-85259-557-3
  2. ^ Sutton, R.J. & K.W. Anthony. The Stamp Collector's Encyclopaedia. 6th edition. London: Stanley Paul, 1966, p.165.

Further reading

[edit]