Lexile

Lexile

Creator	MetaMetrics
Website	www.lexile.com
v t e

Part of a series on
Reading
Learning to read Reading readiness Vocabulary development Vocabulary learning
Scientific theories and models Dual route theory Simple view of reading Science of reading Scarborough's Reading Rope The active view of reading model
Cognitive processes Comprehension Phonemic awareness Phonological awareness Subvocalization Word recognition
Reading instruction Analytic phonics Basal reader Concept-oriented Directed listening and thinking activity Guided reading Independent reading Literature circle Phonics Reciprocal teaching Structured word inquiry Sustained silent reading Synthetic phonics Whole language
Reading rate Fluency Slow reading Speed reading Words per minute
Readability Automatic assessment Legibility Readability test
Reading differences and disabilities Dyslexia Hyperlexia Reading disability Reading for special needs
Language Alphabetic principle Braille Dolch word list Grapheme History of printing Language Morpheme Orthography Phoneme Sight word Vocabulary Written language Writing Writing system
Literacy Critical literacy Close reading Distant reading Family literacy Functional illiteracy Great books Literary criticism Literature Children's
v t e

The Lexile Framework for Reading is an educational tool that uses a measure called a Lexile to match readers with reading resources such as books and articles. Readers and texts are assigned a Lexile score, where lower scores reflect easier readability for texts and lower reading ability for readers. Lexile scores are assigned based on individual words and sentence length, rather than qualitative analysis of the content. Thus, Lexile scores do not reflect multiple levels of textual meaning or the maturity of the content.^[1] The United States Common Core State Standards recommend the use of alternative, qualitative methods to select books for grade 6 and above.^[1] In the U.S., Lexile measures are reported annually from reading programs and assessments.^[2] According to LightSail Education, about half of U.S. students in grades 3-12 receive a Lexile measure each year.^[3] The Georgia Department of Education provides resources for using Lexile measures.^[4]

The Lexile Framework is made up of Lexile reader measures and Lexile text measures, both of which are put on the Lexile scale.

The Lexile scale runs from BR300 (Lexile) to above 2000L, though there is not an explicit bottom or top to the scale.^[5] Scores 0L and below are reported as BR (Beginning Reader). These books or students may be coded as Lexile: BR. In some cases, a student will receive a BR code followed by a number (e.g. Lexile: BR150L). A measure of BR150L indicates that the Lexile measure is 150 units below 0L.^[6]

This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A Lexile measure is defined as "the numeric representation of an individual's reading ability or a text's readability (or difficulty), followed by an 'L' (Lexile)".^[7] There are two types of Lexile measures: Lexile reader measures and Lexile text measures. Reader measures are assigned to individuals based on their reading comprehension for a piece of text. Text measures are assigned to a piece of text based on the text's vocabulary and syntax. According to MetaMetrics, text measures are evaluated through the "Lexile Analyzer", a computer program that assigns a score based on vocabulary and syntax.^[8] MetaMetrics states that over 150 publishers, including Capstone Publishers,^[9] Discovery Ed, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, McGraw-Hill, Pearson PLC, Riverside Publishing, Scholastic Corporation, Simon & Schuster,^[10] Workman Publishing Company,^[11] and World Book,^[12] offer certified Lexile text measures for their materials.^[13]

According to MetaMetrics, Lexile text measures can assist in selecting appropriately challenging materials for readers.^[14]

Some books receive Lexile codes—two-letter designations that appear before the Lexile measure—to provide additional context about developmental appropriateness, reading difficulty, and intended use. BR is the only code that applies to both readers and text.^[6]

The Lexile framework was created in 1989 by MetaMetrics. From 1984 to 1996, MetaMetrics received funding through five grants from Small Business Innovation Research, obtained through the National Institutes of Health, to develop a measurement system for reading and writing.^[15][16]

The measurement ideas embedded in the Lexile framework can be found in two 1982–83 articles by Stenner and Smith.^[17][18]

In Mesmer's Tools for Matching Readers to Texts: Research Based Practices, a 2006 study by Walpole et al. is described,^[19] in which 47 second-graders were assigned texts based on their Lexile scores. The study found that the students could read texts at their assigned Lexile scores (93%), but also noted that 43% of the sampled books were below a basic standard for 2nd grade. Mesmer concludes that "Lexile scores and book levels may not help teachers in finding books that can be read fluently" and lists the cost of using the Lexile inventory tools as a disadvantage.^[20]

In 2001, the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) published a review of Lexile measures, concluding that the framework is an improvement over traditional reading measures, while also noting the omission of factors such as reader motivation, interest, and knowledge.^[5] The review affirmed the value of sentence length and word frequency as measures of complexity but also stated that these metrics are an estimated correlate of readability. The NCES concluded that while other work on text metrics may be more useful, Lexile scores are easier to analyze.^[5]

In 2001, Stephen Krashen published an article arguing that the Lexile Framework was potentially harmful in limiting students' reading choices and that the resources spent on it might be better spent on books.^[21]

In a paper titled "Interpreting Lexiles in Online Contexts and with Informational Texts", Elfrieda H. Hiebert concluded that the variability of Lexile scores within the same text can be extensive and that slight changes in punctuation can result in "significant reclassification" on the Lexile scale.^[22]

U.S. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts states that Lexile scores can be used to help determine text complexity levels for students. The standards also note that quantitative methods like Lexile may underestimate the challenges of complex narrative fiction and that qualitative measures should be prioritized for students in grade 6 and above.^[1]

More examples are available here.^[23]

Lexile measures are reported by various reading assessments and programs.^[24]

Source:^[25] State assessments^[26]

• Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS)
• California English-Language Arts Standards Test
• Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System
• Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR)
• Georgia Georgia Milestones and the Georgia High School Graduation Test (GM and GHSGT)
• Hawaii State Assessment
• Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT)
• Kansas State Assessments of Reading
• Kentucky Core Curriculum Test (KCCT)
• Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA)
• New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (SBA)
• North Carolina End-of-Grade and English I End-of-Course (NCEOG and NCEOC)
• Oklahoma Core Curriculum Test (OCCT)
• Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS)
• South Carolina Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS)
• South Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (DSTEP)
• Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program (TCAP) Achievement Test
• Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS)
• Virginia Standards of Learning Tests (SOL)
• West Virginia WESTEST 2
• Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students (PAWS)