Lp spaces form an important class of Banach spaces in functional analysis, and of topological vector spaces. Because of their key role in the mathematical analysis of measure and probability spaces, Lebesgue spaces are used also in the theoretical discussion of problems in physics, statistics, economics, finance, engineering, and other disciplines.
The Euclidean distance between two points and is the length of the straight line between the two points. In many situations, the Euclidean distance is appropriate for capturing the actual distances in a given space. In contrast, consider taxi drivers in a grid street plan who should measure distance not in terms of the length of the straight line to their destination, but in terms of the rectilinear distance, which takes into account that streets are either orthogonal or parallel to each other. The class of -norms generalizes these two examples and has an abundance of applications in many parts of mathematics, physics, and computer science.
For a real number the -norm or -norm of is defined by The absolute value bars can be dropped when is a rational number with an even numerator in its reduced form, and is drawn from the set of real numbers, or one of its subsets.
The Euclidean norm from above falls into this class and is the -norm, and the -norm is the norm that corresponds to the rectilinear distance.
The -norm or maximum norm (or uniform norm) is the limit of the -norms for , given by:
For all the -norms and maximum norm satisfy the properties of a "length function" (or norm), that is:
only the zero vector has zero length,
the length of the vector is positive homogeneous with respect to multiplication by a scalar (positive homogeneity), and
the length of the sum of two vectors is no larger than the sum of lengths of the vectors (triangle inequality).
Abstractly speaking, this means that together with the -norm is a normed vector space. Moreover, it turns out that this space is complete, thus making it a Banach space.
The grid distance or rectilinear distance (sometimes called the "Manhattan distance") between two points is never shorter than the length of the line segment between them (the Euclidean or "as the crow flies" distance). Formally, this means that the Euclidean norm of any vector is bounded by its 1-norm:
This fact generalizes to -norms in that the -norm of any given vector does not grow with :
for any vector and real numbers and (In fact this remains true for and .)
For the opposite direction, the following relation between the -norm and the -norm is known:
This inequality depends on the dimension of the underlying vector space and follows directly from the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.
In for the formula defines an absolutely homogeneous function for however, the resulting function does not define a norm, because it is not subadditive. On the other hand, the formula defines a subadditive function at the cost of losing absolute homogeneity. It does define an F-norm, though, which is homogeneous of degree
Although the -unit ball around the origin in this metric is "concave", the topology defined on by the metric is the usual vector space topology of hence is a locally convex topological vector space. Beyond this qualitative statement, a quantitative way to measure the lack of convexity of is to denote by the smallest constant such that the scalar multiple of the -unit ball contains the convex hull of which is equal to The fact that for fixed we have shows that the infinite-dimensional sequence space defined below, is no longer locally convex.[citation needed]
There is one norm and another function called the "norm" (with quotation marks).
The mathematical definition of the norm was established by Banach's Theory of Linear Operations. The space of sequences has a complete metric topology provided by the F-norm on the product metric:[citation needed] The -normed space is studied in functional analysis, probability theory, and harmonic analysis.
Another function was called the "norm" by David Donoho—whose quotation marks warn that this function is not a proper norm—is the number of non-zero entries of the vector [citation needed] Many authors abuse terminology by omitting the quotation marks. Defining the zero "norm" of is equal to
The space of sequences has a natural vector space structure by applying scalar addition and multiplication. Explicitly, the vector sum and the scalar action for infinite sequences of real (or complex) numbers are given by:
Define the -norm:
Here, a complication arises, namely that the series on the right is not always convergent, so for example, the sequence made up of only ones, will have an infinite -norm for The space is then defined as the set of all infinite sequences of real (or complex) numbers such that the -norm is finite.
One can check that as increases, the set grows larger. For example, the sequence is not in but it is in for as the series diverges for (the harmonic series), but is convergent for
One also defines the -norm using the supremum: and the corresponding space of all bounded sequences. It turns out that[1] if the right-hand side is finite, or the left-hand side is infinite. Thus, we will consider spaces for
The -norm thus defined on is indeed a norm, and together with this norm is a Banach space.
In complete analogy to the preceding definition one can define the space over a general index set (and ) as where convergence on the right means that only countably many summands are nonzero (see also Unconditional convergence). With the norm the space becomes a Banach space. In the case where is finite with elements, this construction yields with the -norm defined above. If is countably infinite, this is exactly the sequence space defined above. For uncountable sets this is a non-separable Banach space which can be seen as the locally convexdirect limit of -sequence spaces.[2]
For the -norm is even induced by a canonical inner product called the Euclidean inner product, which means that holds for all vectors This inner product can expressed in terms of the norm by using the polarization identity. On it can be defined by Now consider the case Define[note 1] where for all [3][note 2]
The index set can be turned into a measure space by giving it the discrete σ-algebra and the counting measure. Then the space is just a special case of the more general -space (defined below).
An space may be defined as a space of measurable functions for which the -th power of the absolute value is Lebesgue integrable, where functions which agree almost everywhere are identified. More generally, let be a measure space and [note 3] When , consider the set of all measurable functions from to or whose absolute value raised to the -th power has a finite integral, or in symbols:[4]
To define the set for recall that two functions and defined on are said to be equal almost everywhere, written a.e., if the set is measurable and has measure zero. Similarly, a measurable function (and its absolute value) is bounded (or dominated) almost everywhere by a real number written a.e., if the (necessarily) measurable set has measure zero. The space is the set of all measurable functions that are bounded almost everywhere (by some real ) and is defined as the infimum of these bounds: When then this is the same as the essential supremum of the absolute value of :[note 4]
For example, if is a measurable function that is equal to almost everywhere[note 5] then for every and thus for all
For every positive the value under of a measurable function and its absolute value are always the same (that is, for all ) and so a measurable function belongs to if and only if its absolute value does. Because of this, many formulas involving -norms are stated only for non-negative real-valued functions. Consider for example the identity which holds whenever is measurable, is real, and (here when ). The non-negativity requirement can be removed by substituting in for which gives Note in particular that when is finite then the formula relates the -norm to the -norm.
Seminormed space of -th power integrable functions
Each set of functions forms a vector space when addition and scalar multiplication are defined pointwise.[note 6] That the sum of two -th power integrable functions and is again -th power integrable follows from [proof 1] although it is also a consequence of Minkowski's inequality which establishes that satisfies the triangle inequality for (the triangle inequality does not hold for ). That is closed under scalar multiplication is due to being absolutely homogeneous, which means that for every scalar and every function
Absolute homogeneity, the triangle inequality, and non-negativity are the defining properties of a seminorm. Thus is a seminorm and the set of -th power integrable functions together with the function defines a seminormed vector space. In general, the seminorm is not a norm because there might exist measurable functions that satisfy but are not identically equal to [note 5] ( is a norm if and only if no such exists).
Zero sets of -seminorms
If is measurable and equals a.e. then for all positive On the other hand, if is a measurable function for which there exists some such that then almost everywhere. When is finite then this follows from the case and the formula mentioned above.
Thus if is positive and is any measurable function, then if and only if almost everywhere. Since the right hand side ( a.e.) does not mention it follows that all have the same zero set (it does not depend on ). So denote this common set by This set is a vector subspace of for every positive
Quotient vector space
Like every seminorm, the seminorm induces a norm (defined shortly) on the canonical quotient vector space of by its vector subspace This normed quotient space is called Lebesgue space and it is the subject of this article. We begin by defining the quotient vector space.
Given any the coset consists of all measurable functions that are equal to almost everywhere. The set of all cosets, typically denoted by forms a vector space with origin when vector addition and scalar multiplication are defined by and This particular quotient vector space will be denoted by Two cosets are equal if and only if (or equivalently, ), which happens if and only if almost everywhere; if this is the case then and are identified in the quotient space. Hence, strictly speaking consists of equivalence classes of functions.[5][6]
Given any the value of the seminorm on the coset is constant and equal to , that is: The map is a norm on called the -norm. The value of a coset is independent of the particular function that was chosen to represent the coset, meaning that if is any coset then for every (since for every ).
The Lebesgue space
The normed vector space is called space or the Lebesgue space of -th power integrable functions and it is a Banach space for every (meaning that it is a complete metric space, a result that is sometimes called the Riesz–Fischer theorem). When the underlying measure space is understood then is often abbreviated or even just Depending on the author, the subscript notation might denote either or
If the seminorm on happens to be a norm (which happens if and only if ) then the normed space will be linearlyisometrically isomorphic to the normed quotient space via the canonical map (since ); in other words, they will be, up to a linear isometry, the same normed space and so they may both be called " space".
In general, this process cannot be reversed: there is no consistent way to define a "canonical" representative of each coset of in For however, there is a theory of lifts enabling such recovery.
For the spaces are a special case of spaces; when are the natural numbers and is the counting measure. More generally, if one considers any set with the counting measure, the resulting space is denoted For example, is the space of all sequences indexed by the integers, and when defining the -norm on such a space, one sums over all the integers. The space where is the set with elements, is with its -norm as defined above.
Similar to spaces, is the only Hilbert space among spaces. In the complex case, the inner product on is defined by Functions in are sometimes called square-integrable functions, quadratically integrable functions or square-summable functions, but sometimes these terms are reserved for functions that are square-integrable in some other sense, such as in the sense of a Riemann integral (Titchmarsh 1976).
As any Hilbert space, every space is linearly isometric to a suitable where the cardinality of the set is the cardinality of an arbitrary basis for this particular
If we use complex-valued functions, the space is a commutativeC*-algebra with pointwise multiplication and conjugation. For many measure spaces, including all sigma-finite ones, it is in fact a commutative von Neumann algebra. An element of defines a bounded operator on any space by multiplication.
If then can be defined as above, that is: In this case, however, the -norm does not satisfy the triangle inequality and defines only a quasi-norm. The inequality valid for implies that and so the function is a metric on The resulting metric space is complete.[7]
In this setting satisfies a reverse Minkowski inequality, that is for
The space for is an F-space: it admits a complete translation-invariant metric with respect to which the vector space operations are continuous. It is the prototypical example of an F-space that, for most reasonable measure spaces, is not locally convex: in or every open convex set containing the function is unbounded for the -quasi-norm; therefore, the vector does not possess a fundamental system of convex neighborhoods. Specifically, this is true if the measure space contains an infinite family of disjoint measurable sets of finite positive measure.
The only nonempty convex open set in is the entire space. Consequently, there are no nonzero continuous linear functionals on the continuous dual space is the zero space. In the case of the counting measure on the natural numbers (i.e. ), the bounded linear functionals on are exactly those that are bounded on , i.e., those given by sequences in Although does contain non-trivial convex open sets, it fails to have enough of them to give a base for the topology.
Having no linear functionals is highly undesirable for the purposes of doing analysis. In case of the Lebesgue measure on rather than work with for it is common to work with the Hardy spaceHp whenever possible, as this has quite a few linear functionals: enough to distinguish points from one another. However, the Hahn–Banach theorem still fails in Hp for (Duren 1970, §7.5).
This inequality, called Hölder's inequality, is in some sense optimal since if and is a measurable function such that where the supremum is taken over the closed unit ball of then and
If then every non-negative has an atomic decomposition,[9] meaning that there exist a sequence of non-negative real numbers and a sequence of non-negative functions called the atoms, whose supports are pairwise disjoint sets of measure such that and for every integer and and where moreover, the sequence of functions depends only on (it is independent of ). These inequalities guarantee that for all integers while the supports of being pairwise disjoint implies
For the space is reflexive. Let be as above and let be the corresponding linear isometry. Consider the map from to obtained by composing with the transpose (or adjoint) of the inverse of
This map coincides with the canonical embedding of into its bidual. Moreover, the map is onto, as composition of two onto isometries, and this proves reflexivity.
If the measure on is sigma-finite, then the dual of is isometrically isomorphic to (more precisely, the map corresponding to is an isometry from onto
The dual of is subtler. Elements of can be identified with bounded signed finitely additive measures on that are absolutely continuous with respect to See