Manuel v. Joliet
Manuel v. Joliet | |
---|---|
Argued October 5, 2016 Decided March 21, 2017 | |
Full case name | Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, et al. |
Docket no. | 14-9496 |
Citations | 580 U.S. ___ (more) 137 S. Ct. 911; 197 L. Ed. 2d 312 |
Case history | |
Prior | Manuel v. Joliet, 590 F. App'x 641 (7th Cir. 2015); cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016). |
Procedural | On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit |
Holding | |
A criminal defendant may challenge his pretrial detention on the ground that it violated the Fourth Amendment (all other issues, including the claim's timeliness, was left to the court below). | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
Dissent | Thomas |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Thomas |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Manuel v. Joliet, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant may bring a claim under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution to challenge pretrial confinement.[1] In a 6-2 majority opinion written by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court stated that "the Fourth Amendment governs a claim for unlawful pretrial detention even beyond the start of legal process".[2] This decision reversed and remanded the judgment of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.[3] Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion.[4] Justice Thomas also joined a dissenting opinion by Justice Samuel Alito.[5]
See also
[edit]- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Manuel v. Joliet, 580 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)