Portal talk:Spaceflight

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about Spaceflight. Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page. If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. Archives: 1

This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Portals (Rated Mid-importance) This page is a portal. Portals are within the scope of WikiProject Portals, a collaborative effort to improve portals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortalsWikipedia:WikiProject PortalsTemplate:WikiProject PortalsPortals articles ??? This portal has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.  Mid  This portal has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. See also: List of Portals This portal's subpages have been checked by an editor, and are needed. Please take care when editing, especially if using automated editing software. Learn how to update the maintenance information here. (April 2019) Spaceflight This page is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles

Automated portal content suggestions (purge) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate. Recent Did you know? items No recent additions Recent In the news items No recent news Featured, valued, and quality images (on Commons) Open a link, then click the "Do it" button. If there are results, you can click the "Thumbnails" button to preview all the images. Featured pictures for Spaceflight with recent edits Valued images for Spaceflight with recent edits Quality images for Spaceflight with recent edits Articles Featured articles for Category:Spaceflight promoted in 2024

Archives
for the Spaceflight Portal talk page

• Space exploration Portal Archive
• Archive 1 – March 2006 –

Wikimedia has recently allowed the upload of 3D models. The addition of 3D models will allow a much better understanding of the structure of spacecrafts and rockets than 2D diagrams. @Fac-tory-o already made several models of spacecrafts, including Juno and Voyager. It would be great to have more.

I think there are also some 3D models on the official NASA website that are open source. Converting them to .stl and uploading them to Commons should be fairly easy.

Article on the introduction of 3D models on Wikipedia. Note that only .stl files are supported right now.

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:3D_models_of_rockets
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:3D_models_of_spacecraft

XYZtSpace (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bug or feature? :)

--Neopeius (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Transhumanist: Do you know the answer to Neopeius' question? Kees08 (Talk) 18:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it was not reshuffling with a purge, then it was a bug, maybe. The DYK entries were organized in groups, and the group selected at random. It is possible a group could be displayed twice or even three times in a row even though randomly chosen. You might be wondering why I wrote "was a bug"...

I've taken the liberty to restart the portal, upgrading it to a single-page, more automated, design. The excerpts are now all transcluded, meaning they will always match the source rather than be a static copy-and-paste copy of it; that is, now they won't go stale over time. I've replaced the single-entry "Selected" sections with excerpt slideshows, that let the user browse through a selection of up to 50 entries at a time (randomized with each purge). I've expanded the entries in the overall selections being drawn from as well, which now include many more topics and more images, and hundreds of biographies. The selections are dynamic, and will change over time along with the source destinations -- as entries are added to those, they will in turn be available in the portal. The "Did you know" and "In the news" sections are search-parameter driven, showing entries from the past 36 months and 45 days respectively, thus, showing new entries over time. I hope you like it.    — The Transhumanist   06:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: @Neopeius and Kees08: (ping)

Wow! Thanks so much for the quick response. :) --Neopeius (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC

How does one update the DYK section? One of them referred to the "upcoming" film, Hidden Figures, for instance. --Neopeius (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TASS gives some cost estimates for a planned Russian "Amur" rocket. I don't find it on Wikipedia and I would be surprised if we missed that completely - did it have a different name before? This website links it to Angara-5, but that is flying and not reusable. --mfb (talk) 21:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have an IP that repeatedly adds a list of people for Crew-3 to SpaceX Dragon 2. We also have that list in SpaceX Crew-3 and Commercial Crew Program. I don't find any announcement by NASA, SpaceX, or anyone else. The only reference I find is the one in the article, going to spacefacts.de. Is that reliable, and where did they get that information from? Because I fear they copied the Wikipedia table (which is older than spacefacts.de's page, creating "facts" via circular referencing. --mfb (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone removed it again from the Crew-3 page, I removed it from three other articles. --mfb (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]