Pratt v A-G for Jamaica

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Pratt v A-G for Jamaica" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Pratt v A-G for Jamaica
Arms of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Court	Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Full case name	Earl Pratt and Ivan Morgan, Appellants v The Attorney General for Jamaica and The Superintendent of Prisons, Saint Catherine's, Jamaica, Respondents
Decided	2 November 1993
Citations	[1993] UKPC 1, [1994] 2 AC 1
Case history
Prior action	Court of Appeal of Jamaica
Case opinions
Lord Griffiths
Keywords
Capital punishment; inhuman or degrading punishment

Pratt v A-G for Jamaica is a 1993 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) case in which it was held that it was unconstitutional in Jamaica to execute a prisoner who had been on death row for 14 years. The JCPC held that because the Constitution of Jamaica prohibits "inhuman or degrading punishment", excessive delays cannot occur between sentencing and execution of the punishment. In cases of such excessive delay, the death sentence should be commuted to life imprisonment.

The JCPC held that any delay of more than five years between sentencing and execution was prima facie evidence that carrying out the sentence would constitute inhuman or degrading punishment. It suggested that the entire appeals process in Jamaica should take no more than two years, and that any further applications to the United Nations Human Rights Council should take no more than 18 months.

• Pratt v A-G for Jamaica, bailii.org