Template talk:Baháʼí

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bahá'í Faith This template is within the scope of WikiProject Bahá'í Faith, a coordinated attempt to increase the quality and quantity of information about the Baháʼí Faith on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this template, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Bahá'í FaithWikipedia:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithTemplate:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithBahá'í Faith

This looks fabulous. I'd suggest this order for the "Key Figures"

Shoghi Effendi

Táhirih

Quddús

Badí'

Hands of the Cause (?) (Rúhíyyih Khanum was one of many.)

Sounds good to me. -- Jeff3000 14:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also on Template:Bahá'í? MARussellPESE 15:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest something like this:

• Shoghi Effendi
• Badí'
• Martha Root (by the way, she needs a picture)
• Mírzá Abu'l-Fadl
• Nabíl-i-A'zam

I think the Hands would go under administration. If linking to a people group, there's a page for the Apostles. Quddus's article is not done very well so I took it off. Cuñado - Talk 16:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While Badi' and Nabíl-i-A'zam were important people in the history of the Faith, I wouldn't call them key figures. Definitely Shoghi Effendi, Tahirih is important in regards to the emancipation of women. Martha Root is also very important. Of the others, maybe we should just link to Hands of the Cause and the Apostles of Baha'u'llah. -- Jeff3000 18:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds fine. I think Mirza Abu'l Fadl was pretty important too. So how about:

• Shoghi Effendi
• Badí'
• Martha Root
• Apostles
• Hands of the Cause

Martha Root, and the Apostles page need to be fixed up a bit. Cuñado - Talk 23:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would put Tahirih over Badi' but I don't feel that strongly, so that is fine. We don't need five names for the vertical template, so we can cut out the articles that don't meet the necessary quality. For the horizontal template, having 5 looks better. -- Jeff3000 03:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template seems to suffer from censorship. Several articles which concerns the faith such as Homosexuality and the Bahá'í Faith and Political objections to the Baha'i Faith have been removed for no reason.*Trekker (talk) 12:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]