Template talk:City of Adelaide suburbs

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Australia: Adelaide City of Adelaide suburbs is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles This template is supported by WikiProject Adelaide.

According to UBD, there are only two: Adelaide and North Adelaide. Adelaide is everything south of the river, including the park lands, and North Adelaide is everything north of the river. --AtD (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a) Presumably you mean: "Adelaide is everything south of the river, including the park lands, and North Adelaide is everything north of the river, including the park lands."?

b) Which year UBD, and which bit of it, says there are two suburbs, and how does it say that? (tone of voice: "polite enquiry" (as distinct from "hostile challenge"))

c) Are you aware that UBD is not error free? (tone of voice: "polite enquiry")

d) I agree that the park lands are not a suburb as such, but they are an important and significant part of the "City of Adelaide"; they are what gives Adelaide much of its "personality" and "character". Although not ranked as a "suburb", they can't not be mentioned. Hence, I (and others) feel they should be there in the list, and I feel that they should be presented in a manner that denote that they are different from Adelaide and North Adelaide. I had considered (See also Adelaide Parklands), but wondered if that was perhaps rather too clumsy. What are your thoughts on the matter?

e) P.S. I changed the order: they were alphabetic (North Adelaide, South Adelaide); I agree they should be (North Adelaide, Adelaide), but they should also be in sort - i.e. (Adelaide, North Adelaide).

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with the presentation you've put up. And for the record, the UBD is backed up by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (go to their Census data page, unfortunately I can't get a link that works because it's dynamic). --AtD (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with the presentation you've put up. - Thank you. (That makes life easier!)

And for the record, the UBD is backed up by the Australian Bureau of Statistics - That's interesting. (I didn't know that.) Never-the-less, "Are you aware that UBD is not error free?" (Specifically, I'm referring to the 2008 edition.)

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]