Template talk:Current G20 leaders
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do we put the EU Commission President or the Council President as the European Leader? Therequiembellishere (talk) 22:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
flags?
[edit]Do we really need flags for all the leaders here. Images is a bad way to convey information that is important since it makes it harder for the color blind, difficult for screen readers, and for print outs. See WP:ACCESS. It also look horrible. Rettetast (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Since there has been no response i have removed the flags a second time. Rettetast (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Removing the flags has made the template very ugly. I believe we should reinstate them JarvisLorry1895 (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Navbox consensus
[edit]There are plausible reasons for modifying the navbox templates at the bottom of the page at G-20 major economies. An opportunity for discussion needs to be part of any process which precedes change. Three arguable improvements are:
A. Combining two of the current navboxes at the bottom of the page?
- template name to remain the same {{G20}}—Template:G20?
- new template would be similar to {{APEC}}—Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
- this would mean removing {{G-20 leaders' summits}}—Template:G-20 leaders' summits?
B. Deleting the current leaders navbox?
- This is a poor subject for a navbox because leaders change irregularly over time. The functional utility of this navbox is not greater or better than one which only shows member nations.
- this would mean removing {{Current G20 Leaders}}—Template:Current G20 Leaders?
C.Standardize/harmonize to "G20" without hyphen?
- Only G-15 must have a hyphen, consistent with the group's official web site?
D. Perhaps decision-making may be helped by comparing an array of similar groups and templates?
|
|
What is the best next step for this article? for similar articles? --Tenmei (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)