Template talk:Genetic translation

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology This template is supported by the Genetics task force.

There is an entry for start codon, how about adding one for stop codon? RJFJR (talk) 16:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Jebus989^✰ 12:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cell and molecular biology articles contains some awesome big-picture showing templates comparing prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Such as this one template Template:Genetic translation and also Template:DNA replication (this template) , Template:Transcription and

However now we know, this prokaryote vs. eukaryote classification is quite an artificial classification, and 3 distinct group, eubacteria (bacteria in new sense), archaebacteria (archaea) and eukaryote works better.

So shouldn't we create 3 fields (total) (1 for bacteria, archaea and eukaryote, each)? Also, in some cases if we have lack of information about archea, we should keep empty place for archaea.

Also this-one template, Template:Genetic translation (Permalink) shows some rows for archaea; but they used "prokaryote" to mean eubacteria (bacteria of new meaning). But prokaryote does not mean eubacteria. Prokaryote includes both eubacteria (only "bacteria" in new use) and archaea.

So I think it is time to update the templates.

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]