Template talk:Jurong Region MRT line

@1.02 editor:@Iiiii7d: Could the current diagram be replaced with the one in the sandbox? I find that it is a better diagram. R22-3877 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@R22-3877: dang you beat me to it. That looks like a wonderful diagram though, i dont mind it being the new routemap. 1.02 editor (T/C) 11:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes to jurong east to reflect that it is a triple line interchange hope you're ok with it. 1.02 editor (T/C) 11:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

202.55.72.86 (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC) Hi, because of the branched nature of the JRL, showing all stations on one side has the downside of being discontinuous in station numbering. I would suggest the use of {{BS-map}} instead of {{Routemap}}, which is what systems like the Docklands Light Railway use. There stations can be put on both sides of the template, improving readability while also saving space.[reply]

I probably won't be able to respond in time to upload my own version (besides not having a WP account), but thanks in advance.

We used a routemap template is it is the same as what the other lines uses and it better retains the shape of the line than the BS map. The Station numbering is not an issue as there is a table listing all the stations in order. Thanks 1.02 editor (T/C) 15:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it is also possible to put stations on the left for Routemap, if I'm not wrong. R22-3877 (talk) 06:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, just saw the suggestion above and made a Routemap with the station labels on both sides in my sandbox. This allows the different branches to appear in contiguous sections. Hope you will consider this reworking. Coshatiuav (talk) 04:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]