This template is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
I see that Cornwall Services has been added. Ditto Cambridge, although that's a red-link. Neither are motorway services, they're nowhere near a motorway in fact. Do we allow their inclusion and rename the template, or remove the non-motorway entries? 10mmsocket (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surprised nobody else has replied to this. Anyway, since Cornwall doesn't have any motorways, and is unlikely to do so, somewhere like this is probably the nearest equivalent for long-distance traffic, and so I would apply common sense. If you find the infobox parameters are largely irrelevant or misleading, then that would suggest not using it. Regarding the article itself, I would simply consult the general notability guidelines and if you don't think there are sufficient sources to make a standalone article on Cornwall Services, then I would suggest starting an AfD. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)11:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]