This template is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
I see that Cornwall Services has been added. Ditto Cambridge, although that's a red-link. Neither are motorway services, they're nowhere near a motorway in fact. Do we allow their inclusion and rename the template, or remove the non-motorway entries? 10mmsocket (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surprised nobody else has replied to this. Anyway, since Cornwall doesn't have any motorways, and is unlikely to do so, somewhere like this is probably the nearest equivalent for long-distance traffic, and so I would apply common sense. If you find the infobox parameters are largely irrelevant or misleading, then that would suggest not using it. Regarding the article itself, I would simply consult the general notability guidelines and if you don't think there are sufficient sources to make a standalone article on Cornwall Services, then I would suggest starting an AfD. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)11:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]