Template talk:Supranational European Bodies

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Europe This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope International relations This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

They should be moved inside the EPC circle 2601:181:4500:39A:5500:32B3:1FA3:DC82 (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth having the European Political Community here? It seems undue. CMD (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe its inclusion is warranted and surpasses WP:N requirements. It's relatively new in the political arena, but, its creation seems to have garnered a lot of attention as a new pan-European initiative rivaling the CoE. The EPC seems to be developing quite rapidly into a prominent structure focusing on the future of Europe, and has already been endorsed by major European powers and political figures. Since inception, it now includes nearly every state in Europe and is set to meet twice annually to discuss critical topics (war, conflict, energy security, trade) affecting millions of Europeans. Archives908 (talk) 04:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what relevance WP:N has to do with this template, the notability is not at issue. The question is whether it merits inclusion in this selective template. As it stands, the European Political Community isn't even really a 'body'; it has no structures of its own, and is explicitly designed around the European Union. CMD (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis Under your suggestion, SCO should be removed from {{Supranational Asian Bodies}} as that bloc will have at least one purely-Europe country, isn't that? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is more that Template:Supranational Asian Bodies is a pile of WP:SYNTH, unlike this one where at least most of the groups are related. CMD (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis And how this isn't SYNTH?! In my opinion we should consider using British–Irish Council instead of CTA for UK-Ireland circle. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that particular case, the CTA is similar to Schengen, and the impact of one on the other is the topic of some research [1][2]. CMD (talk) 04:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three Seas Initiative also known as Baltic, Adriatic, Black Sea (BABS) Initiative the group that contains Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Doremon764 (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note there is also Category:Bottom-up regional groups within the European Union. Kaihsu (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romania and Bulgaria is now in Schengen on October 2023. New Welaeonska (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were scheduled to join in October but it hasn't actually happened yet, and likely won't before the end of the year. See the Bulgaria and Romania section of Schengen Area for up-to-date status. Austin Harper 19:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As of March 31st 2024, Romania and Bulgaria are now in Schengen with regard to air and sea borders. I'm unsure how to indicate this on the diagram, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaxtrope (talk • contribs) 09:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about in the same way Croatia is dotted-lined into EEA? 2A02:169:BB:1:B62E:99FF:FEF2:F23B (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! That would be a fine way to do it. Gaxtrope (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucharest_Nine is formed by the countries of the Baltic assembly plus Visegrád group plus Romania and Bulgaria. Does any of you reading that knows how to add a line around those countries on the Euler diagram? 130.238.112.129 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note there is also Category:Bottom-up regional groups within the European Union. Kaihsu (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo may be represented by UNMIK in CEFTA, but that’s not the case in the European Political Community. Kaihsu (talk) 10:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about adding a new grouping for the ETIAS countries? The group seems to consist of all the Schengen countries plus Cyprus. Set theorist (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are plans for Cyprus joining Schengen by 2025. This would make the two identical. Gaxtrope (talk) 12:40, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Do we know whether that will be before or after ETIAS begins? Set theorist (talk) 09:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]