Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Anglie

The Tractatus de legibus et consuetudinibus regni Angliae (Treatise on the Laws and Customs of the Kingdom of England), often called Glanvill, is the earliest treatise on English law. Attributed to Ranulf de Glanvill (died 1190) and dated 1187–1189, it was revolutionary in its systematic codification that defined legal process and introduced writs, innovations that have survived to the present day. It is considered a book of authority in English common law.

Written for Henry II (r. 1154–1189) as the culmination of his long struggle to return the kingdom to peace and prosperity following years of anarchy, the Tractatus is fairly described as the means to implement Henry's objectives. It would be supplanted ^{[citation needed]} as a primary source of English law by the De legibus et consuetudinibus Angliae (On the Laws and Customs of England) of Henry de Bracton (c. 1210 – c. 1268), which itself owes much of its heritage to the Tractatus.

There has been debate over the actual author of all or parts of the Tractatus. The legal opinions of Glanvill's nephew, Hubert Walter are certainly cited.^[2] Whatever the case, Glanvill perhaps supervised and certainly approved the work, and the issue is sidestepped in the literature by using terminology such as "commonly attributed to Glanvill".

Ancestry

Background

Law in England at the time of the publication of the Tractatus was a combination of Norman law in Normandy as modified to address perceived defects in it, inventions to address any problems unique to Norman control of England, and adaptations from the customs of the English when it suited Norman purposes. Also, a nascent but evolving feudalism had existed in England since the late tenth century.^[3]

The legal system was initiated by William the Conqueror (reigned 1066–1087) and was fully in place in the time of Henry I (reigned 1100–1135), during which time English law evolved along its own path. That is the immediate provenance of the Tractatus, regardless of the ultimate origins of this "Anglo-Norman" law.

Henry Bracton, author of the latterTractatus, was familiar with Roman Law^{[note 1]} and Canon Law, had long practical experience in the administration of justice, and was intimately aware of weaknesses in the system and how best they might be corrected.

Pollock and Maitland, in their History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, describe Glanvill's contracts as "purely Germanic", and state that the "law of earnest is not from Roman influence".^[5]

The concept of the Norse Lawspeaker may play a role as well, only converting it from spoken to written form.

There seems to be consensus that the English law ultimately does not rely on earlier Roman codifications. Scrutton noted the lack of a heritage owed to Roman law (i.e., the Corpus Juris Civilis) in the Tractatus,^[6] stating that some terminology was borrowed solely to be fitted into the book discussing Contracts (Tractatus, Book X), but that the terms were applied to English concepts.

Context

By 1135, the evolution of Anglo-Norman law was showing its age, with some parts working acceptably but many parts being cumbersome, ineffectual, and vulnerable to opposition by local lords. The time of Stephen's reign (1135–1141, 1141–1154) was a disaster, known in English history as "The Anarchy". Reform was needed and wanted, and Henry II (reigned 1154–1189) was equal to the challenge. Henry brought order out of legal chaos. He made the King's Court the common court throughout England, carefully defining its jurisdiction and those of the church, the lords, and the sheriff. He made it the guardian of the King's peace, with uniform protection for everyone.^{[citation needed]}

The Tractatus was the culmination of Henry's efforts, the means to implement his objectives. That this is attributable to legal evolution over his reign, rather than to sudden change, is shown by its purposeful inclusion of the principles of his earlier reforms such as the Assize of Clarendon. While some portions of the content of the Tractatus were first noted as exceptional innovations of Henry I, Henry II deserves credit for the revolution that made the innovations common rather than exceptional.

Henry II is also noted for choosing strong and very capable men to implement his policies, and then giving them the latitude to do their jobs without interference. Among them was Glanvill, who was Chief Justiciar of England from 1180 to 1189, and who acted as regent in Henry's absence, which was often.^{[citation needed]}

Document

In an age before widespread literacy and mechanical printing, it was common for all works, great and small, to borrow and copy from previous works without explicit attribution. The Preface of the Tractatus is commonly described as an admiring imitation of the Prœmium (Preface) to the Institutes of Justinian, with no negative implications of plagiarism. The Preface to the Institutes begins Imperatoriam Majestatem, but the Preface to the Tractatus begins Regiam Potestatem.

The Preface^[7] lays out the objectives, in effect saying that good laws and government are in the interests of justice, and these are the objectives of the King. The Tractatus consists of fourteen books, and is largely confined to objects of jurisdiction in the Curia Regis.

Fourteen books

*Tractatus*, Books I – III
No.	Chapters	Contents
I ^[8]	I – XXXIII	Pleas belonging to the King's Court, or to the Sheriff; Essoins; the preparatory steps up to the time both parties to a suit appear in court
II ^[9]	I – XXI	Summons, Appearance, Pleadings, Duel or Grand Assize, the Champion, Judgement and Execution
III ^[10]	I – VIII	Vouching to Warranty; and of two Lords, under one of whom is the Demandant and under the other is the Tenant

These first two books treat the Writ of Right, when originating in the Curia Regis, and all its stages. Taken with the third book, the three together are a description of the proceedings in a Writ of Right for the recovery of land, including all the stages relating to the Writ of Right.

*Tractatus*, Books IV – XI
No.	Chapters	Contents
IV ^[11]	I – XIV	Rights of the Ecclesiastical Advowsons
V ^[12]	I – VI	Condition and Villeinage
VI ^[13]	I – XIII	Dower
VII ^[14]	I – XVIII	Alienation, Descents, Succession, Wardship, Testaments
VIII ^[15]	I – X	final Concords and Records in general
IX ^[16]	I – XIV	Homage, Relief, Fealty, Services, Purprestures, and Boundaries Disturbed
X ^[17]	I – XVIII	Debts arising from different types of Contracts, Pledges and Gages (whether Movable or Immovable), Charters containing Debts
XI ^[18]	I – IV	Attorneys

These first eleven books dispense with actions commenced originally in the Curia Regis.

*Tractatus*, Books XII – XIV
No.	Chapters	Contents
XII ^[19]	I – XXV	Plea of Right and Writs of Right, when brought in the Lord's Court, and the manner of removing them to the County Court and Curia Regis; which leads to the mention some other Writs determinable before the Sheriff.
XIII ^[20]	I – XXXIX	Pleas by Assises and Recognitions, different kinds of Disseisins
XIV ^[21]	I – VIII	Criminal Pleas belonging to the Crown

Versions

Versions of the *Tractatus*^[22]
Year	Description
1265	a revised version written or transcribed by Robert Carpenter of Haresdale, according to Glanvill Revised by Maitland^[23]
1554	Printed by R. Tottle in small 8vo;^[24] this was at the suggestion of judge and author Sir William Stanford, according to Coke.
1604	Printed by Thomas Wight; the text was corrected by the collation of "various manuscripts".
1673	Exact reprint of Wight's 1604 edition, but omitting the Preface.
1776	Printed in the first volume of Houard's Traités sur les Coutoumes Anglo-Normandes in quarto, Rouen. An imperfect text according to Gross.^[25]
1780	Published by John Rayner, 8vo. Collated with the Bodleian, Cottonian, Harleian, and Milles' manuscripts by J. E. Wilmot.
1812	English translation from Latin, published by John Beames in octavo, with notes.
1828	Printed as an appendix to George Phillip's Englische Reichs und Rechtsgeschichte, ii, 335.

Descent

Immediate impact

The use of writs limited the jurisdiction of all other courts and transferred jurisdictions of lord and county courts to the King's Court. The mechanics of the eyre were used for a new institution, where several counties were combined into a circuit and a judge was appointed to ride the circuit, bringing the King's Court to every part of the kingdom. The general unwillingness to grant continuances (essoins) greatly reduced the time needed to complete judicial proceedings. The King's Court, through its writs, held ultimate jurisdiction in adversarial proceedings over real property. Establishing the "truth" of facts through the rational process of an Assize Court (later superseded by the jury) was given as an alternative to the options of trial by ordeal, or the use of champions as substitutes, or the use of character testimonials rather than evidence to determine the outcome of legal contests.^[26]

The emergence at this time of the doctrine of res judicata brought finality to the verdicts rendered, complementing the Tractatus though not a part of it, and serving to emphasize that the Tractatus was itself a part of Henry's reforms, but not the only part.

Ecclesiastical courts retained jurisdiction over matters of marriage, legitimacy, wills, ecclesiastical issues, and redress for breach of ordinary contracts, but the writs of the King's Court prevented them from intruding elsewhere.

The effect was unifying, and trial by jury in the King's Court was so popular that it deprived other courts of litigation. More important for the future of England, it was so satisfactory that it contributed to English culture by cultivating a universal respect for law and a willingness to abide by its decision.

In legal history

The writs and processes of the King's Court, together with the judicial organisation, are the germ of English common law. Similarly, the judicial oversight of property disputes through the use of writs are the germ for English land law. The option of the rational process of weighing evidence in a trial by jury would outlive all of its alternatives to become the only way to determine the "truth" of facts.

Glanvill is cited copiously by name in books on English law, whether chronological histories or subject-oriented legal books, and in the latter where there are a number of references relevant to the topic at hand, he is cited as the earliest authority. Spelling variations of the name include Glanvil, Glanvill (the most common), and Glanville.

The Regiam Majestatem

The Scottish Regiam Majestatem was written perhaps in the reign of Robert the Bruce (1306–1329) but not earlier than 1318, as it includes a Scottish statute written in that year.^[27] Some two-thirds of it was adapted without change from chapters of the Tractatus, and some of the rest is different from the Tractatus but very similar to it. The remainder of the Regiam Majestatem is unrelated to the Tractatus, and mostly covers the area of crimes.^[28]

References

Notes

^ The long-lost civil law was nowhere restored until a copy of the sixth century Pandects of Justinian I was found in Italy in 1127, and spread from there. This civil law was taught at Oxford in 1150.^[4] However, that is not to say that the Tractatus owes a heritage to it.

Citations

^ Ranulfo de Glanvilla (Ranulf de Glanville) (1780), Tractatus de Legibus et Consuetudinibus Regni Angliæ, tempore regis Henrici Secundi compositus, justiciæ gubernacula tenente illustri viro Ranvlpho de Glanvilla, Juris Regni et antiquarum Consuetudinum eo tempore peritissimo. Et illas solum leges continet et consuetudines secundum quas placitatur in Curiâ regis, ad Scaccarium, et coram justiciis ubicunque fuerint. Cum MSS. Harl. Cott. Bodl. et Mill. collatus, London: Prostant venales apud J. White et E. Brooke, OCLC 437769980.
^ Robert C. Stacey, ‘Walter, Hubert (died 1205)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004
^ Stubbs 1895:13–19
^ Cameron, Peter Hay (1883), "Regiam Majestatem", Summary of the Law of Intestate Succession in Scotland (Second, Revised and Enlarged ed.), Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute (published 1884), p. 3
^ Pollock & Maitland 1898:207–208
^ Scrutton, Thomas Edward (1884), "Roman Law in Glanvil", The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England, Cambridge (published 1885), pp. 74–77{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^ Beames 1900:xxxv–xxxix Tractatus, Preface
^ Beames 1900:1–30 Tractatus, Book I
^ Beames 1900:31–58 Tractatus, Book II
^ Beames 1900:59–68 Tractatus, Book III
^ Beames 1900:69–82 Tractatus, Book IV
^ Beames 1900:83–92 Tractatus, Book V
^ Beames 1900:93–112 Tractatus, Book VI
^ Beames 1900:113–160 Tractatus, Book VII
^ Beames 1900:161–174 Tractatus, Book VIII
^ Beames 1900:175–197 Tractatus, Book IX
^ Beames 1900:198–222 Tractatus, Book X
^ Beames 1900:223–230 Tractatus, Book XI
^ Beames 1900:231–245 Tractatus, Book XII
^ Beames 1900:246–277 Tractatus, Book XIII
^ Beames 1900:278–291 Tractatus, Book XIV
^ Beames 1900:xiii–xiv Tractatus, Introduction to Beame's translation, by Joseph Henry Beale
^ Maitland, Frederic William (November 1891), "Glanvill Revised", Harvard Law Review, vol. VI, Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Publishing Association (published 1892), pp. 1–7
^ http://hollis.harvard.edu/?q=Tractatus%20de%20legibus%20et%20consuetudinibus ^{[dead link‍]}
^ Gross, Charles (1914), "Law Writers", The Sources and Literature of English History from the Earliest Times to About 1485 (Second ed.), London: Longmans, Green, and Co (published 1915)
^ Beames 1900:xv–xvii Tractatus, Introduction to Beame's translation, by Joseph Henry Beale
^ Kidd, Colin (1993), Subverting Scotland's Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity 1689 – c. 1830, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (published 2003), p. 149, ISBN 0-521-52019-3
^ Neilson, George (1890), "In the Regiam", Trial by Combat, Glasgow: William Hodge & Co, p. 104

Bibliography

Beames, John (1900) [1812], A Translation of Glanville, Legal Class Series, vol. 1, Washington, D. C.: John Byrne & Co.
Brunner, Heinrich (1908), The Sources of English Law, translated by Freund, Ernst, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company
Davis, Henry William Carless (1905), England under the Normans and Angevins, 1066 – 1272, New York{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Pollock, Frederick; Maitland, Frederic William (1898), The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, vol. II (2nd ed.), Cambridge: University Press
Reeves, John (1869), Finlason, W. F. (ed.), Reeves' History of the English Law, vol. I (New ed.), London: Reeves & Turner
Smith, Arthur Lionel (1825), Jones, Lance G. E. (ed.), Notes on Stubbs' Select Charters, Oxford: Oxford University (published 1925)
Stubbs, William (1895), "A Sketch of the Constitutional History of the English Nation Down to the Reign of Edward I", in Stubbs, William (ed.), Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History (Eighth ed.), Oxford: Oxford University (published 1905), pp. 1–51

External links

[5] The long-lost civil law was nowhere restored until a copy of the sixth century Pandects of Justinian I was found in Italy in 1127, and spread from there. This civil law was taught at Oxford in 1150.^[4] However, that is not to say that the Tractatus owes a heritage to it.

[1] Ranulfo de Glanvilla (Ranulf de Glanville) (1780), Tractatus de Legibus et Consuetudinibus Regni Angliæ, tempore regis Henrici Secundi compositus, justiciæ gubernacula tenente illustri viro Ranvlpho de Glanvilla, Juris Regni et antiquarum Consuetudinum eo tempore peritissimo. Et illas solum leges continet et consuetudines secundum quas placitatur in Curiâ regis, ad Scaccarium, et coram justiciis ubicunque fuerint. Cum MSS. Harl. Cott. Bodl. et Mill. collatus, London: Prostant venales apud J. White et E. Brooke, OCLC 437769980.

[2] Robert C. Stacey, ‘Walter, Hubert (died 1205)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004

[3] Stubbs 1895:13–19

[4] Cameron, Peter Hay (1883), "Regiam Majestatem", Summary of the Law of Intestate Succession in Scotland (Second, Revised and Enlarged ed.), Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute (published 1884), p. 3

[6] Pollock & Maitland 1898:207–208

[7] Scrutton, Thomas Edward (1884), "Roman Law in Glanvil", The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England, Cambridge (published 1885), pp. 74–77{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[8] Beames 1900:xxxv–xxxix Tractatus, Preface

[9] Beames 1900:1–30 Tractatus, Book I

[10] Beames 1900:31–58 Tractatus, Book II

[11] Beames 1900:59–68 Tractatus, Book III

[12] Beames 1900:69–82 Tractatus, Book IV

[13] Beames 1900:83–92 Tractatus, Book V

[14] Beames 1900:93–112 Tractatus, Book VI

[15] Beames 1900:113–160 Tractatus, Book VII

[16] Beames 1900:161–174 Tractatus, Book VIII

[17] Beames 1900:175–197 Tractatus, Book IX

[18] Beames 1900:198–222 Tractatus, Book X

[19] Beames 1900:223–230 Tractatus, Book XI

[20] Beames 1900:231–245 Tractatus, Book XII

[21] Beames 1900:246–277 Tractatus, Book XIII

[22] Beames 1900:278–291 Tractatus, Book XIV

[23] Beames 1900:xiii–xiv Tractatus, Introduction to Beame's translation, by Joseph Henry Beale

[24] Maitland, Frederic William (November 1891), "Glanvill Revised", Harvard Law Review, vol. VI, Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Publishing Association (published 1892), pp. 1–7

[25] ttp://hollis.harvard.edu/?q=Tractatus%20de%20legibus%20et%20consuetudinibus ^{[dead link‍]}

[26] Gross, Charles (1914), "Law Writers", The Sources and Literature of English History from the Earliest Times to About 1485 (Second ed.), London: Longmans, Green, and Co (published 1915)

[27] Beames 1900:xv–xvii Tractatus, Introduction to Beame's translation, by Joseph Henry Beale

[28] Kidd, Colin (1993), Subverting Scotland's Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity 1689 – c. 1830, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (published 2003), p. 149, ISBN 0-521-52019-3

[29] Neilson, George (1890), "In the Regiam", Trial by Combat, Glasgow: William Hodge & Co, p. 104

[1]

[2]

[3]

[note 1]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[4]

v t e English law
Core subjects	UK Constitution Administrative law Criminal law Contract law Tort law Privacy Property law Trust law Retained EU law Case law
Further subjects	Company law Competition law Labour law Commercial law Civil procedure Family law Courts of England and Wales
Related systems	UK-wide Northern Ireland Scotland Wales Australia British Virgin Islands Canada Hong Kong India New Zealand Singapore United States Anglo-Saxon law Common law Equity Bloody Code Hue and cry
Category Portal

v t e Law
Core subjects	Administrative law Civil law Constitutional law Contract Criminal law Crime Deed Doctrine Equity Evidence International law Law of obligations Private law Procedure Civil Criminal Property law Public law Punishment Corporal Restitution and unjust enrichment Statutory law Tort
Disciplines	Abortion law Agricultural law Aviation law Amnesty law Banking law Bankruptcy Commercial law Competition law Conflict of laws Construction law Consumer protection Corporate law Cyberlaw Drugs law Election law Energy law Entertainment law (Media law) Environmental law Family law Financial law Financial regulation Health law Immigration law Intellectual property International criminal law International human rights International slavery laws International trade law Jurimetrics Labour Landlord–tenant law Law of war Legal archaeology Legal fiction Maritime law Marriage law Military law Nationality law Probate Estate Will and testament Product liability Public international law Refugee law Reparations Space law Sports law State of emergency Tax law Transport law Trust law Unenforced law
Sources of law	Charter Legal code / Statutory law Constitution Custom Divine right Divine law Human rights Letters patent Natural law Natural and legal rights Case law Precedent Law reports Legal treatise Regulations
Law making	Ballot measure Codification Decree Edict Executive order Proclamation Legislation Delegated legislation Regulation Rulemaking Promulgation Ratification Repeal Treaty Concordat Statutory law Statute Act of parliament Act of Congress Basic structure doctrine
Legal systems	Civil law Common law Chinese law Legal pluralism Religious law Canon law Catholic canon law Hindu law Jain law Jewish law Parsi law Sharia Roman law Byzantine law Socialist law Statutory law Xeer Yassa
Legal theory	Anarchist Contract theory Comparative law Expressive function Feminist Law and economics Legal formalism History Libertarian International legal theory Principle of legality Principle of typicality Pseudolaw Rule of law Rule of man Sociology
Jurisprudence	Adjudication Administration of justice Constitutionalism Criminal justice Court-martial Dispute resolution Fiqh Lawsuit/Litigation Legal opinion Legal remedy Judge Justice of the peace Magistrate Judgment Judicial review Jurisdiction Jury Justice Practice of law Attorney Barrister Counsel Lawyer Legal representation Prosecutor Solicitor Question of fact Question of law Trial Trial advocacy Trier of fact Verdict
Legal institutions	Barristers' chambers Bureaucracy The bar The bench Civil society Court Court of equity Election commission Executive Judiciary Law enforcement Agency Legal education Law school Legislature Military Police Political party Tribunal
History	History of the legal profession History of the American legal profession Women in law
Law portal Category Index Outline

Authority control databases
International	VIAF
National	United States Israel