User talk:Buidhe

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people Eastern Europe or the Balkans the Troubles They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Hello, Buidhe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomasz Jedrowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Buidhe. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiwi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I'm hoping you can shed light on what it was you had in mind when you created Category:Drugs by structure, which I just came across. After looking through the contents, I found only 2 items that seem to have any possible reason for being placed in the category: Peptide therapeutics‎ and Small-molecule drug‎s - and honestly, I'm not sure either of them really makes sense either. Perhaps we can come up with a better name for the Category if you can explain the rationale for me? Regards, Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS - Please be sure to Ping me when you reply. Thanx. Anomalous+0 (talk) 07:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anomalous+0 I was trying to clean up the main drugs category by moving out subcategories that were about the structure / chemical composition rather than the function, of the drug. For example, drugs that contain deuterium or radioactive isotopes, those that are small molecules vs peptides. (t · c) buidhe 13:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Substation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Contractor and Grounding.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Krikor Bogharian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JoeNMLC, while I appreciate patrollers, the draftification is clearly inappropriate, because the article cites two scholarly sources that extensively discuss the article subject, and also support all of the content in the article. (t · c) buidhe 15:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not know that "Further reading" entries were sources. Thanks for letting me know. Still learning something new every day. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]