User talk:101.53.244.100

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I will provide the source please you may wait for sometime, 101.53.244.100 (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for the guidance , I understand the Wikipedia guidelines with less experience,

in-connection with editing and restoration of original contents of the article of Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani As a good Wikipedia Editor you must help to improve the article instead deletion of the available information again and again , so your help is required for improvement of the article in question, Profound Regards and Stay Blessed.(101.53.244.100 (talk) 11:16, 28 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Dear George Custer's Sabre (talk) You are the only Wikipedia editor who revert Constructive edits of worthy Volunteers Wikipedia Editors without making sense of Notability, You impose only one law of Wikipedia instead following the Wikipedia laws allowing Volunteers wikipidians editors for making constructive edits in articles, I have checked and gone through the record of your Edit Contributions and I found your contribution 94 1% based on reverting and deleting the contents of Wikipedia Volunteers deliberately just to show your self as a superior editor and nothing else, for example you had reverted the Photograph of in the article of Dur Mohammad Kassi with the remarks that you will show how this pic came, I show you that how this pic has been provided to net, this Photograph is soul property of Prof:- PHD Haji akhtar Muhammad kassi brother of haji dur Muhammad kassi who released it From the personal collections of photographs of Dur Muhammad Kassi for public & Common use 09-02-2010, and this was published in [[1]] on Tuesday, March 01, 2011 with permission of Prof:- PHD Haji akhtar Muhammad kassi brother of haji dur Muhammad kassi, In the light of above facts you are once again requested to please refrain from my constructive edits by making unnecessary reverts,

I Wish you the Best and Happy New Year 2021 few hours in advance, (101.53.244.100 (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

That is nonsense. Assume good faith (click the link to read the Wikipedia guideline) and refrain from personal attack or accusations. I have the right as an editor to remove unreferenced information and copy edit badly written text. That’s called copy editing. I edit professionally and without an agenda. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• • Please no abusing language and refrain from personal attack Assume good faith (click the link to read the Wikipedia guideline) Every Constructive edit looks to you nonsense because I just show your edit history that what you are doing with the articles only Revereting the edits of Wikipedia Volunteers I have not seen any progressive change in your edits for the betterment and improvement of an article except few ones which are on your agenda, I have no personal attacked on you instead you did on me else-here I wished you Happy New Year in advance, please be positive like other thousands of Wikipedia editors and come out from negative thinking, the world is full of professional and progressive Wiki editors who make positive and constructive edits for the development of articles,

You must be sorry for uncivilized language, Happy Editing, (101.53.244.100 (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]