User talk:16@r

This user may have left Wikipedia. 16@r has not edited Wikipedia since May 5, 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

2006-2007 January-June 2008

I have nominated Flagged revisions, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flagged revisions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asynchronous conferencing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Asynchronous conferencing and synchronous conferencing are opposite; current version has no value

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chealer (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Economy of Europe (template) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Etymonline.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gandi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category:Continents has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 11:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Company.com. Since you had some involvement with the Company.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Googler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic is most definitely not notable enough to merit it's own article. It could be merged into the main Google article perhaps. It's only got two sentences!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeshoney (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Internet in the Middle East, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Other uses5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Redirects from domain name, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Géoportail Mont Blanc.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Géoportail Mont Blanc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asia country portals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Help:Scary transclusion. Since you had some involvement with the Help:Scary transclusion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 02:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European political parties has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 00:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Media in Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alexa Internet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Otheruses-word has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -DePiep (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Instantaneous has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Instantaneous is an adjective that can be applied to any number of quantities, but none of them are referred to as just "instantaneous". None of the articles listed are very likely to be searched for by that term, and this is therefore not a useful disambiguation page. Furthermore, four of the entries are redlinks, two are redirects to articles not specifically about "instantaneous" (ship stability and power (physics)) and one is a redirect (instantaneous frequency) to the one remaining article, instantaneous phase. At best, this should be a redirect to the one valid dab article, but I think deletion would be better without prejudice to a future creation of a proper article at this title. SpinningSpark 20:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpinningSpark 20:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Workmate. Since you had some involvement with the Workmate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). UltraMagnus^speak 09:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newspapers by continent (template) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 16:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Internet by region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lists category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Preloaded requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nikthestoned 11:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Wikimapia.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a totally useless article you created, so therefore it has been tagged for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.28.14.189 (talk) 17:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National football teams of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Regard. Since you had some involvement with the Regard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Projective (financial company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projective (financial company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jevon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jevon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extension has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Good job (phrase) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced dicdef, nothing encyclopedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 23:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fullscreen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary; this page only contains dictionary definitions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. greenrd (talk) 23:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unsolvability. Since you had some involvement with the Unsolvability redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TimBentley (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Navigational meta-templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that and the other (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start date and age has been nominated for merging with Template:Start date and years ago. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rezonansowy (talk) 01:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .db is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.db (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. � (talk) 19:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Lists of languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lfdder (talk) 12:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:I2lc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lfdder (talk) 16:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Agritourism in Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. OwenBlacker (Talk) 20:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Television in Europe templates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 11:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Globo.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 24seven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JustBerry (talk) 03:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MediEvil series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creeps (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creeps (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Creeps (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creeps (novel) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 06:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox dot-com company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Google Code.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Flagfox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable firefox extension. unable to find any WP:RS extensively about this product.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 11:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Civil unions in Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Download Express has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for multiple issues since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 03:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My bad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My bad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 23:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Supermarkets in Europe templates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 15:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ソニック・ザ・ヘッジホッグ. Since you had some involvement with the ソニック・ザ・ヘッジホッグ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Adam9007 (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beforehand. Since you had some involvement with the Beforehand redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anarchism in Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Discolouration. Since you had some involvement with the Discolouration redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 16@r,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of countries by number of internet users for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Iamoctopus (talk) 19:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect -pedia. Since you had some involvement with the -pedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of American singers. Since you had some involvement with the List of American singers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 14:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tinyweb. Since you had some involvement with the Tinyweb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Business award. Since you had some involvement with the Business award redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wishva de Silva | Talk 11:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blikis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of eBay homepage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 53 port. Since you had some involvement with the 53 port redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 12:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Petit pois. Since you had some involvement with the Petit pois redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xander Cage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xander Cage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airlines in Europe templates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sandbox/, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Google domains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Google domains until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Col-break/examples has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unload. Since you had some involvement with the Unload redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Politics of North America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capital of Israel. Since you had some involvement with the Capital of Israel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Languages of North America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. 16@r, thanks for creating Media of Slovakia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as having no categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international television channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international television channels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-permanent. Since you had some involvement with the Non-permanent redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of networks. Since you had some involvement with the List of networks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 12:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Social titles has been nominated for merging with Template:Personal names. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OpenServing. Since you had some involvement with the OpenServing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]