User talk:217.155.44.114

Hello, I'm S0091. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aeroservicios Ecuatorianos Flight 767-103 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 18:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Merthyr Tydfil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 49 TL 19:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The wub. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kenny Sansom—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. the wub "?!" 11:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Uig, Skye has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Uig, Skye was changed by 217.155.44.114 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861059 on 2020-09-11T20:18:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, you added some information to Snooker about the "snookerpool" variant. Where did you get that from? We've come to the conclusion that it's not a derived game, just a misnomer for snooker, or maybe what it used to be called originally since it was basically a new form of pool. If you have any sources that state otherwise, we would be very interested to have a look, but if you're just going on hearsay then it can't go in the article as it would just be an example of WP:OR and we're hoping to get this article up to Featured Article status later this year. Cheers, Rodney Baggins (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you tried to add some information on snookerpool to the Snooker article again. We've come to the conclusion that unless we can find a reliable source with a description of how it's played, the snookerpool variant is a non-starter. I accept that it is probably a popular game in Northern England and I'm not in any way suggesting that what you say is untrue! Has it ever been spoken about in your local newspaper for example? That might give it some clout. It does sound interesting and actually quite good fun but unfortunately anything that's not accompanied by a reliable source is highly unlikely to get past the Featured Article review stage so there's no point adding it in now. Rodney Baggins (talk) 11:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Snooker, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 09:40, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Leiningen (software)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colgan Air Flight 3407 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dana Air Flight 0992. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skynxnex (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]