User talk:217.162.74.13

Hello, I'm Majavah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of AMD accelerated processing units—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Majavah ^(t/c) 18:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That was a misclick, I apologize. Regards, Majavah ^(t/c) 18:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Izno (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contributions to Template:AMD APU features. I think you should create an account, as this makes working on Wikipedia more convenient. --Soluvo (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Padgriffin. Your recent edit to Digital radio appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin Noises} 10:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Digital radio. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin Noises} 10:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 23:36, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

217.162.74.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

America is the name of the whole continent

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 23:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

217.162.74.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Someone falsely accused me twice of being unconstructive (disproved by references) and now someone destroyed all my work.

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. It's some random complaint. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

217.162.74.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not damage any content

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

217.162.74.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My modifications are based on serious sources. I have added references when requested.

Decline reason:

Since you can't be bothered to write unblock requests that address the reasons for the block, and presumably can't be bothered to read the guide to appealling blocks, despite having three times been advised to do so, your unblock requests achieve nothing apart from wasting administrators' time that could have been spent on more useful tasks, so I shall remove your talk page access for the duration of the block. JBW (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to ThinkPad W series—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Can You check these SVG graph for mistakes?

Before I add the T15g and E570p model inside of them. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Where are the X1 Tablets? 217.162.74.13 (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These only a laptop graph, only because this graph is extremely huge with all laptop models. I think about creating a additional graph for tablets. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the X1 are not just tablets, they are detachable laptops. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 22:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's make a point, I can going to try to add a tablet line. But, if these line start make a troubles for me, I create a dedicated graph for tablets and detachables, so.ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I think the convertibles should go in the same graph. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 22:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what about c (X) and i models? 217.162.74.13 (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I currently work with "i series" and "#***i" models. What's do you mean? I think, these are a both of significant lines. Also, what's do You mean as a "c (X)"? ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I messed up the edit. I meant i (X) and c, like X201i and E570c. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 23:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Chromebooks are not mentioned. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greatly thanks, that's a good  addition! ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about the Thinkpads before xx00, R, S, SL, Twist, Helix. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody know much more, only the main series have a small logic in naming, and so, the "i series" is a absolute chaotic. So, can You check about years of release of current E series (and something about 2018-2019 R series)?ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The gen font is too small. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 16:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the Helix? 217.162.74.13 (talk) 18:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! I think about convertibles, they need a lot of vertical space =-\ ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 22:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you would have to plan for the X1 Fold. Maybe there will also be a dual screen model later? 217.162.74.13 (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the X220i Tablet. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 15:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that besides the X1 Nano there will also be X12 "tablet" and X1 Titanium. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 13:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMD x86 CPU features has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]