User talk:2nyte

Hello, 2nyte! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 12:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Australia national association football team you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 04:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Luke Adams (footballer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hamish Watson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scott Basalaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Youth League (Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trevor Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Wanderers F.C. (Australia), 2nyte!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

No apparent issues. Thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for uploading File:Professional Footballers Australia logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Football Federation Victoria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Football Federation Victoria Sunraysia]] ''(SUNRAYSIA

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sport in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you made a change on WSW's current season's stats table to unify the apps, goals and cards. There seems to be a problem with the table, as the 2 rightmost columns don't appear. Do you know how to fix this? --SuperJew (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Hobbit 2 SE CD Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:The Hobbit 2 SE CD Cover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Australia national association football team you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Australia national association football team for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice you made this reversion. The implication is therefor that the team represents both genders. This contravenes both the AOC and the FFA. Can you cite sources that suggest the national team referenced on the page is inclusive to both genders? If not, can you self revert as a show of good faith until you find the sources? --LauraHale (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Football in Australia (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to be a way to get around consensus on Football in Australia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LauraHale (talk) 07:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a lot of reference errors. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. "Cite error: The named reference REFNAME is not used... (see the help page)." Please clean up this section if you revert my edit. Thanks -- Frze ^{> talk} 13:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For all work cleaning up The Hobbit (film series) and respective articles. TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Popular sports in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Australia national association football team". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 01:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the neutrality tag. The neutrality of the article is in dispute. The scope of the article based on the title is the national team, of which Australia has two. By insisting the article about the national team and by hatting the women's team, you are WP:POV pushing and ghettoizing women. Please discuss this on the talk page to resolve the WP:NPOV issue before removing it. --LauraHale (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australia national under-14 association football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korea national under-14 football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 09:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 86th Academy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of sport in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Britain

New Caledonia women's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Women's football

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 FC Barcelona season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}
• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at [Sydney Wanderers FC Talk page.] The AFL project is once again making an attack on the word "Football", this time on an article that has nothing to do with AFL or sport across the country. Macktheknifeau (talk) 11:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That was a very odd thing to say, when the team's match that had just finished when you wrote that had been in Melbourne, where the game is almost universally called soccer. HiLo48 (talk) 23:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

... can you please work on fixing the NPOV issues in the Australia national association football team and Soccer in Australia articles. Having these POV issues is an embarrassment to the game in Australia, and fixing them is a more important content step than the name thing. (and remember, just sticking in men or hatting the national team article doesn't solve the problem). People going to Wikipedia are more likely going to think those articles are crap because of the NPOV tags than they are because they use soccer. --LauraHale (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm banging my head against a wall here if this isn't obvious WP:MEAT I don't know what is. Neither Hilo or Afterwriting will discuss and I'm not going to get myself sanctioned under a 3RR. Head -> Desk -> Repeat --Orestes1984 (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Les Scheinflug may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | nationalteam1 =[Australian national football team|Australia]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added the 2001 results because the 2001 section was blank. Hack (talk) 09:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hack, why add the 2001 results if the info is on 2001 Australia national football team season?--2nyte (talk) 09:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Australia national football team results is supposed to be a list of results, not a series of links to other articles. Hack (talk) 09:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hack, what about the single season articles? Do you intend to redirect them?--2nyte (talk) 09:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, those articles contains information, such as goalscorers and records, that can't be added to the overall results page. Hack (talk) 10:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hack, ok, but the article is already quite lengthy, I don't think we should be adding more content. Maybe we should think of splitting the article. Or we could keep the results up to the year 1999 and from the year 2000 we can just keep the single season articles.--2nyte (talk) 10:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The equivalent England article splits matches into decades. There is scope for the single season articles to exist in addition to the results page but they need to be expanded. Hack (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hack, I would rather keep the results from 1922 to 1999 on Australia national football team results and get that page 100% complete and then at the bottom of the page have a note saying For all match results from 2000–present, see single-season articles. And then we can expand the single-season articles and get them 100% complete. I would like the information centralised but there's also no point on duplicating the recent results.--2nyte (talk) 10:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The list of results should be be just that, results of the full international team. The season articles, if extended back to 1922, have the potential track other relevant information, such as personnel changes, records, records etc. Hack (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hack, I think page length is an issue, Australia national football team results is already too long. Also I don't think season articles are very necessary, especially for the pre-2000 years.--2nyte (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I put the neutrality tag back on. There as no consensus on the talk page that the neutrality issue was resolved. The solutions you offered were rejected. If you really believe the answer is to rename and disambiguate, then please propose that. Until then, please work towards consensus to resolve the problem by making the text of the article neutral in regards to gender. And then, after you feel you have neutralized the text, please ask those who support the neutrality tag being there, if they feel you have addressed their concerns. --LauraHale (talk) 18:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...some reliable sources would be appreciated. GiantSnowman 19:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2nyte, I don't know what you think you were doing with this edit, but it is incorrect. An editor removed a comment and you restored it so you could respond: this is not acceptable talk page behavior. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Melbourne Victory FC seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Hernández (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure you've been in contact with HiLo48 and tried to discuss with him his editing behaviour. I don't know what you're thinking, but I'm thinking It really needs to be knocked on the head, particularly his abuse of (non-existent) powers above other users that are being used to assert control over pages that he's been patrolling. I'd be happy to act as one of the two users that have tried to discuss his editing conduct if you feel like raising an RFC/U about this. --Orestes1984 (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Melbourne Heart FC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to David Williams, Matt Thompson and Michael Marrone

Brisbane Roar FC Youth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Youth League

Perth Glory FC Youth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to National Youth League

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the change to plural leagueS. And you didn't really seem to explain it anywhere. What's the story? HiLo48 (talk) 07:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brisbane Roar FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perry Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The process for requesting comments about user conduct is incredibly complicated, see this page on User conduct and look at the template for setting up an RFC about HiLo48's behaviour. Unfortunately, I don't really believe HiLo48 has engaged in any activity that really meets anything that fits a reason to go up on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents recently and Wikipedia:Meat puppetry is incredibly hard to prove. You might try contacting an uninvolved administrator to get their comments on his behaviour. There has been a consensus on Soccer in Australia, and so holding the position that HiLo48 does is not a matter of filibustering --Orestes1984 (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ed Sheeran - I See Fire.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you look in at User talk:John#Next step; clarification when you have a chance? Thanks a lot. --John (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed this edit, and while I am sure this could be a valid endpoint in our discussion, I would hold off editing a convention which has been largely inactive and then referring to it. I'd rather solve the problem first and then agree the naming convention wording. Make sense? --John (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John, I understand, I wouldn't want to create more problems. But would I be able to copy that content onto another article if I were to revert the edit you brought up? That edit sums up what I would hope the final outcome would be, so I would like to keep it/refer to it in some way.--2nyte (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it's OK to userfy it and we could even maybe use it as a discussion point when we get to discuss properly. I am really pleased at the progress so far, and I am sorry if I came across as snippy in my first comment. I just think that something like this will be an endpoint in a discussion we are only starting to have. Thank you for your contributions. --John (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFC U-14 Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JMHamo (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see the RfC I have started at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Football in Australia). Thanks. --John (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at the Herald-Sun, Melbourne's most popular daily newspaper, outselling the competition four to one. Check it out.[1] --Pete (talk) 05:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the further RfC here. --John (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template Template:Football in Oceania contains a link to a disambiguation page: Football in New Zealand. Is it possible that you solve this? The Banner talk 11:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have no issue with the revert at Western Sydney Wanderers article. I had not realized I had altered that part of the article. - Nick Thorne ^talk 03:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm genuinely confused about what this club is really called. I completely agree with you that the "Pty Ltd" bit doesn't belong in the Infobox, but...

The Infobox is headed "Newcastle Jets". The logo below that says "Newcastle United Jets". The Full Name entry below that now says "Newcastle United". And the article is titled "Newcastle Jets FC".

So, four different names, all visible on the one screen. This is a bit untidy. Can we sort this out? HiLo48 (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Newcastle Jets FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SoMo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Gongshow   talk 04:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2nyte,

I added a "Competition Timeline" section to the Central Coast Mariners page, however you have removed it. Could you please advise why this has been removed?

- darthfyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darthfyer (talk • contribs) 06:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darthfyer, as I mentioned in the edit summary, I previously moved that content to List of Central Coast Mariners FC seasons as I have done with each respective A-League club, this is typical for football articles on wiki.--2nyte (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of Sydney FC records and statistics, 2nyte!

Wikipedia editor Dudel250 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good job! try and fill the tables in the page if you can that i presume you added, otherwise good job!

To reply, leave a comment on Dudel250's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for uploading File:University of Western Sydney logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

`

Hi there. The image you uploaded File:Dwight Yorke Sydney FC 2010.jpg was cropped from a professionally taken Getty images photo (see here). Please do not take other's images and upload them here with a claim you made them yourself. Copyright is taken very seriously and this type of action is not acceptable on Wikipedia - Peripitus (Talk) 23:32, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adelaide Oval.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And so went the other images you have claimed as self-made. One was a crop of a news photo, one was a professional render of a trophy. The image of Somo in concert in tennessee I can't find the original source but I doubt this is self-made and have deleted as well. There is no camera exif information and I have little doubt the image was taken by someone else other than you - Peripitus (Talk) 23:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of A-League managers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Perth Glory FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FFA Cup logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The honours need citing directly per WP:V and WP:BLP, please do not re-add them without also providing reliable sources that explicitly confirm that Mr Ryan has won that honour. GiantSnowman 12:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manly United FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:South Springvale SC.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Inglewood United FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lambton Jaffas FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Floreat Athena FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Edgeworth Eagles FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Charlestown City Blues FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Goulburn Valley Suns FC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for your edit [2]?

I have begun a thread at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Football in Australia)#Full names of soccer clubs to discuss how we should use the "fullname" parameter in the Infobox template. Unfortunately it seems to be being used by some to continue to now sneakily press the claim that their game is called football. Please join the fray. HiLo48 (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 A-League All Stars Game, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Williams and Matt Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, thanks for adding the Phil Moss photo. Was looking at the source and it seems to be CC-BY-SA-NC, which means we can't use it? (NC, ie. non-commerical, being the issue.) Thoughts? I've got a photo of Phil myself which I can just crop myself out of if needed. Not as good as the one you found though :( Daniel (talk) 11:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jefferson Chang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No analysis of the subject in secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 03:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul Lederer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No analysis of subject in secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 03:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Hope I'm in the right place to ask. With a template like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ALeague_MH who sets up a new one for Melbourne City? David.howard.au (talk) 12:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David.howard.au, a temple has already been made here for Melbourne City. Also, anyone can make the template.--2nyte (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-League All Stars Game has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comment I have put here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2014–15_A-League Silent Billy (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Port Adelaide Lion SC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | ground = John Hart Reserve]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2nyte,
I can see templates similar to that one on the deletion discussion, but not the template itself. (I'm not really a template person, so I'm not going to delete or decline deletion.) Maybe it should be put up for discussion first?
Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Perth Oval may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• small><br>'''[[Perth Glory FC]]''' <small>(1996–)</small><br>'''[[Western Force]]''' <small>(2010–))</small><br>'''[[Western Australia Angels]]''' <small>(2013-)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:35, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Melbourne City FC Youth

added a link pointing to Victoria

Melbourne Victory FC Youth

added a link pointing to Victoria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 2nyte. I might be missing something inre: the rationale for the G6 CSD for Australia Cup, but I wanted to ask you if had considered that this might be a decent disambiguation page for FFA Cup, Australian Cup (soccer), and Australian Cup? I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 04:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:I JethroBT, the FFA Cup is not refered to as the 'Australia Cup', nor has it ever been. I don't really think a disambig page is necessary, I'll just put a 'Not to be confused with' tag at the top of the Australia Cup and Australian Cup articles.--2nyte (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I just figured that since "Australia" was part of the FFA, it might be reasonable for it to be searched that way. But if you don't think it's necessary, I'll delete the page to make way for the page move. As for the tags, if you don't think folks would be confused, it's probably fine either way (this is definitely not a topic I'm familiar with at all.) I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 05:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]