User talk:3gg5amp1e

Hi 3gg5amp1e! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:08, Wednesday, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

Hello, 3gg5amp1e. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Fiddle Faddle 18:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I make the globe stop bouncing on my talk page!? IT'S DRIVING ME NUTTERZ!!!!! Please help!!!111!!!1!!! 3gg5amp1e (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how do I make the "Error Incorrect or missing CAPTCHA."go away? I can't read them and it takes me like 20 tries to get it right 3gg5amp1e (talk) 22:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 3gg5amp1e. The CAPTCHA message appears for users who are not yet autoconfirmed. Autoconfirmed accounts have over ten edits and are over four days old; you have the edits but not the account age. So, the best course is to simply wait until you become autoconfirmed. If you're impatient, you could request to be confirmed early at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed, but looking at that page it seems like those requests are not often granted. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you Howicus, I put in a request. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 01:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are now WP:AUTOCONFIRMED so I have removed the confirmed right. I don't think that should cause you any problems but if it does let me know. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Beeblebrox, thank you. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3gg5amp1e, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of M2V-MX, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is neither promotional nor is A7 applicable to hardware products. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3gg5amp1e, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Giuseppe Palmas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "photo journalist famous for his pictures of celebrities" is an unambiguous assertion of importance, please don't tag such articles A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 21:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3gg5amp1e, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Carlos Padilla Maqueo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "played many world tours and before crowds of over 35,000 people" is an assertion of importance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 21:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3gg5amp1e, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mowlam Healthcare, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 21:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3gg5amp1e. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Barry Mansfield, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josh Hyde, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Last Man Standing and Athens International. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

• This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 13:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Thanks for your patience and understanding in applying for access, and moreover your clear dedication toward improving the project. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies), we generally do not include the legal status of a company (Corp., Inc., etc) in the article title. So when you moved Infodata to Infodata Systems, Inc., you failed to follow this convention. The proper title should be Infodata Systems. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll take your word for it User:WikiDan61 as I have 3 more pages to attempt to deOrphan to finish off this category before I can take a break if you know what I mean. I've moved the page back and then to the page name you suggested, I hope this is correct. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do. Thanks. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 19:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't understand. What did I do wrong? User:GorillaWarfare, please help me. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that we spoke on IRC. If you have more questions, feel free to ping me again there, email me, etc. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sir or madam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]