User talk:4twenty42o

This user may have left Wikipedia. 4twenty42o has not edited Wikipedia since 2 November 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

/Archive1,/Archive 2, /Archive3, /Archive4, /Archive5

My talk.. If you are here because I reverted an edit and made a mistake or accused you of vandalism please be civil and I'll fix it. No reason to curse or SHOUT. Accidents do happen...

Please remember that:

Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Can you give an example, please?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 20, 2013; 00:13 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Thank you 4twenty42o for giving to me an opportunity to share my view point. The article talks about growth in distance education. Somehow it missed references to the Indian scenario, where it has made tremendous growth and contributions over the last 50 years.... As a distance educator with over three decades of experience, without hiding my true identity, I am trying link a compilation first of its kind in the Indian context for `further readings'. I hope you will find it worthwhile and reconsider your decision. .. Thank you Ravi K Mahajan (talk) 12:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 4twenty42o for making so many things clear to me.. I understand that my enthusiasm to share, of my own , the `chronology of growth of distance education in India' (where it has just completed 50 yr) with larger group has been seen as a self-advertising activity. ..Well so far I have been an active user of wiki.. and now I want to contribute... You have given me some valuable links.. BUT in this case I feel I shall be cool .. and may be in future you will find my compilation effort (the link) worth sharing with larger community. .. regards......Ravi K Mahajan (talk)(22:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.38.49 (talk) [reply]

Odd characters? What the hell are you talking about?? I don't see any odd character, please be more specific! [1] Besides, if you see anything wrong, you should fix it, NOT REMOVING IT!!! Anyway, I was trying to contribute in Wikipedia, but thanks to the likes of you, I have decided to stop. Good job — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.26.4.117 (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you copied something from the internet does not mean it is correct. Since you are trying to contribute why don't you first talk like an adult (presumably you are one), try not to let something as simple as a warning get you bent out of shape, and discuss with me the mistake i made versus getting childishly worked up and cursing the way you have. i am not one to shy from the words fuck or hell but i do not use those words when conversing with my fellow editors. regards 4twenty42o (talk) 07:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I intervened. Just so you know, people are allowed to use their real names as usernames (I should certainly be a case in point) and cannot be blocked for that even if they edit the articles about themselves in a COI fashion. Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Understood and thanks for stepping in. I will stop in and acknowledge this on users talk page. regards 4twenty42o (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are Han Chinese and they served as Chinese's officials in an Chinese territory.--113.168.102.62 (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think English Wikipedia need to use Chinese spellings for Chineses peoples and Chinese places, not Vietnamese spellings. --113.168.179.132 (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not explaining why I removed that information from the Western North Carolina page. I did so because, as someone with a fair amount on knowledge on east coast/Appalachian geography, I knew that it was factually incorrect. No part of the Tennessee Valley (which is itself a part of the Great Appalachian Valley) lies within the bounds of NC. It is entirely in Tennessee. The Tennessee Valley Authority does cover a small amount of Western NC and the "Tennessee Valley" moniker in general is used to an extent in those far western counties, but only due to sheer proximity and regionalism. Just a quick look at Google Maps satellite imagery makes it clear that the valley is completely geographically west of North Carolina. Those extreme western extents are part of the Great Smoky Mountains (which are a subset of the Blue Ridge Mountains). While this information was incorrect, what remained in the geography section (which is still severely lacking) seemed sound to me. If you have any questions, please ask away. Sorry for any confusion. Next time I'll explain my edits. 98.239.148.245 (talk) 05:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I'm amending my father in law's date of birth on the

Jimmy Jackson (footballer born 1932)

page. It tells me that you have amended it back, although I am new to Wikipedia so not sure if I'm looking at the right revision. Can you let me know if this is right and if so are we talking about the same Jimmy (Notts County player, died 2 March this year) because this one was definitely born on 26 March 1931. I made a cake for his 80th!

Kind regards,

Sally Jackson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salsajax (talk • contribs) 09:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --JasonMacker (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to play into that crap. It is blatant vandalism but not worth arguing about. - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good job reverting IP113 and 123, this person uses multiples IP addresses to avoid 3RR rule. So please semi block for about a month the two pages that we have reverted this IP's edits too. Thank. ༆ (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot protect anything but i will request page protection. - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I requested page protection due to edit-warring and sock/meatpuppetry. I would suggest you leave it be as well though for now. Edit-warring is a serious thing around here. - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

༆ is a nationalist member. English Wikipedia need to use Chinese spellings for Chinese peoples and Chinese places, not Vietnamese spellings. --123.17.228.119 (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not care what he is.. All of you need to discuss further changes as opposed to edit-warring over it. Engage the editor in a discussion on the articles talk page and stop violating our policies regarding wp:sock, wp:editwar and wp:3rr. - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eg, Zhao Tuo is a Han Chinese and most territory of his kingdom belong China, English Wikipedia can not use Vietnamese spelling for his name. --123.17.228.119 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• (I've protected the page.) Oh noes, I do not have new messages? Nobody loves me! :-( Bishonen | talk 00:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you kindly :) - 4twenty42o (talk) 01:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Hi. I have mentioned a discussion you were having about someone else at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Youtubek; now they want more information.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you chimed in on this article :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Cheng_(entrepreneur) I noticed it a while ago, and it seems like the guy himself might be tooting his own horn. The majority of the edits are from an IP address close to where it says he's from, and there's an oddly high amount of detail on awards the person has won without any actual content.

Also the history shows that article was rejected several times. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vancitystars

Until it was finally approved for some reason.

I'm not such a big editor, but this strikes me as an article that might be a candidate for deletion. Not exactly sure how it works. CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the offensive picture because in the Wikipedia guidelines it states that:

"Offensive material should be used only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available."

There is already a picture of him being publicly hanged. Do we need ANOTHER image of his dead body beside his wife with his face all caved in like that? I felt like that picture added nothing to the article, especially since there is already a picture of his dead body on the same page. Delphi00 (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Myxomatosis57. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gwen Haworth, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think adding a tag would automatically make the article reviewed. The message above was send automatically when I un-reviewed it, I guess. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 08:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this revert. Thanks. 92.41.226.162 (talk) 16:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed two items, here and here, and explained why in the edit summaries. All the other changes are to the way the remaining items are formatted and are in line with MOS:DAB. 92.41.226.162 (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 420. be well and blessed, regards and thanks. ڈاکٹر محمد علی (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Copernican principle". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 07:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I've also been editing Wikipedia for several years. This is my third (?) account. I'm not very good at remembering passwords. :P Shiningroad (talk) 04:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I have done. Shiningroad (talk) 04:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. I'm amazed anyone would re-add those edits. Please consider carefully in the future why someone might be removing content, and check the content before restoring. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Page Moseley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

I wanted to reach out to you, and see what I would need to do to have you withdraw your nomination for the Proven (company) being deleted. I've made a few edits, and figured it was worth reaching out to you. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, and thank you for your time.

Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattseacino (talk • contribs) 18:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

So.....From ur descriptions i infer that you were a former Military man......If u should tell me the name of ur country it would most pleasing to me....

--Charles Mohapatra (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So.....From ur descriptions i infer that you were a former Military man......If u should tell me the name of ur country it would most pleasing to me....

--Charles Mohapatra (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I