User talk:512theking

Good to join wikipedia. - User:512theking

I Need to know how to create road maps???? For Interstate 476 and some US Routes. - User:512theking

• Have you asked Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Interstate_Highways or Wikipedia:WikiProject_Philadelphia? Xiner (talk, email) 21:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I responded on my talk page, but I'll post here, too. I make my maps using ArcGIS 9.1, a suite that is available to me at my University. I'm not sure of any free alternatives, and I'm currently away the computer that has the software I use until next week. Perhaps try posting a request for the map at WP:USRD/MTF/R Stratosphere ^{(U T)} 03:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads#Split of US 422. --NE2 04:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People are aquising me of doing things that i never done wrong. They also think that i am User:Albertotineo10, but i'm not idont even know who he is. You guys should be thanking me for fixing up Pennsylvania Route 60, Interstate 476, Pennsylvania Route 33, Pennsylvania Route 10, Pennsylvania Route 611, Interstate 78 in New Jersey and making all of the Interstate 81 articles for every state. Wikipedia sucks and everyone says You cannot relly on Wikipedia!!! This place is like a police station.

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Effective immediately, I am blocking the following users and IPs for abusive sockpuppetry, trolling, image copyright violations, MOS problems, etc. With the exception of Prisonbreak10 and the IPs, all will be blocked indefinitely. The ones not blocked indefinitely will be blocked for 48 hours. However, with any further violations, the aforementioned accounts and any socks will be blocked indefinitely on sight. Let this serve as a final warning to the person behind all of these accounts:

• User:Prisonbreak91
• User:512theking
• User:512theking10
• 209.244.30.249
• 172.146.169.214
• User:Kingofpitching10
• user:Albertotineo10

If anyone has concerns regarding these blocks, please contact me on my talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:copyvionote|Image:I-81 va exit 3.jpg}} {{subst:copyvionote|Image:I-81 s near I-64.jpg}} {{subst:copyvionote|Image:I-081 sb exit 300 03.jpg}} Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Newark Airport Interchange, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newark Airport Interchange and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Newark_Airport_Interchange.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 22:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What ever bitch! delete da fucking picture i dont care. -- 512theking

A template you created, Template:Bb HoF, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 11:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Interchanges in Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary page. Interchanges are mentioned in each respected Route article. Other states do not have their own list of interchanges. Nothing about this warrants its own page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tinton5 (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interchanges in Pennsylvania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interchanges in Pennsylvania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tinton5 (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]