User talk:891 mm
891 mm, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi 891 mm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You're welcome; I would have translated it sooner if I could, and I hope it looks reasonable. If you have a page number for that book reference (or any other references to the station), please add! English Wikipedia likes to have references in all articles.
Next time, if you start an article in Swedish, please consider creating it in your sandbox (there should be a link at the top of the page) and then moving it to mainspace after you've translated it. Otherwise, hit Save only after it's in English. Those of us active at WP:Pages needing translation into English try to catch and translate foreign-language articles, but there are a lot of English-speaking editors who can't read any foreign language and will tag such articles for speedy deletion. So it saves a lot of frustration if you have it in English before you make it public. Otherwise, I want to thank you for your work and encourage you to keep doing it. That's a pretty little station on a couple of interesting historic lines, and we don't have enough about Sweden in en.wikipedia. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Djursholms Ekeby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ekeby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Stockholm–Roslagens Järnvägar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dannemora
- Stocksundet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Log
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Värtabanan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Additions and project taggings
[edit]Hello, 891 mm and thanks for your many contribitions. I noted that you've contributed many Sweden-related articles, and that you add interwiki links to Swedish Wikipedia when applicable. It would be useful if you would also add a project template for WP:SWEDEN (and any other projects that may apply). See Talk:Mörby railway station for an example. If you feel unsure about the ratings, just adding the project template without these parameters is also useful, i.e., putting {{WikiProject Sweden|class=stub|importance=low}} on the talk page. Again, thanks for your contributions! Tomas e (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Riksdag
[edit]891 mm, I reverted your undiscussed move of Riksdag. As you know the article's title has been the subject of several recent discussions which you've participated in. As there have been multiple community discussions on the name, the article can't be moved again without another one. Please don't do it again.--Cúchullain t/c 13:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/891 mm, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Cúchullain t/c 15:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/891 mm. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/891 mm. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC) |