User talk:ARandomShyGuy

Hi ARandomShyGuy,

Thank you for your recent edit on the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign page. I wanted you to know I reverted your edit, as Wikipedia requires sources to state an official "theme song" for the campaign. Songs that happen to play during a rally do not automatically qualify them as official theme songs. If I remember correctly, there was a New York Times article that I read months ago that described some unofficial theme songs for the Biden campaign, although I cannot find it right now. If you can provide sources that clearly describe an official "theme song" for the Biden 2024 campaign please feel free to add it to the page. Thank you! BootsED (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I was confused and thought I was supposed to add the songs there after seeing the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign article. I at first attempted to add the songs to the campaign song article but I kept accidently messing up the infoboxs while editing and eventually gave up and added them to the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign article thinking they would belong there. ARandomShyGuy (talk) 04:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Isaidnoway. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kanye West presidential campaigns have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 00:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sorry, I tried to replace a broken link with an archived one from the Wayback Machine but it broke the article and caused a bunch of cite errors. I'm sorry, it won't happen again. ARandomShyGuy (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for replying again quickly but I seriously don't understand what happened. All I did was replace a broken outdated website link (it linked to the defunct campaign site for Kanye's 2020 campaign) in an infobox with one from the Wayback Machine. I've done this several times before on many presidential campaign articles without any issues. I don't know why it caused cite errors or why those additional <ref>s appeared because I didn't edit anything else. Words cannot express my shame and confusion. ARandomShyGuy (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Walsh90210 (talk) 01:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]