User talk:Abhinav1976

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
29		Donegal county football team (talk)	Add sources
10		Vincent Illuzzi (talk)	Add sources
6		Virginia V. Lyons (talk)	Add sources
201		Iskandar Puteri (talk)	Add sources
9		Awa Marie Coll-Seck (talk)	Add sources
241		Robert de Brus, 6th Lord of Annandale (talk)	Add sources
69		Gelang Patah (talk)	Cleanup
162		Citizens' Movement (Mexico) (talk)	Cleanup
18		Health in Eswatini (talk)	Cleanup
868		Luhansk Oblast (talk)	Expand
44		Khoo Kay Kim (talk)	Expand
174		Ecko Unltd. (talk)	Expand
26		Catherine L. Mann (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10		Leitrim county football team (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5		Liam Sammon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
597		National Bolshevik Party (talk)	Merge
38		Clinical mental health counseling (talk)	Merge
8		2022 Chad floods (talk)	Merge
11		Elyas Omar (talk)	Wikify
12		Ray Caesar (talk)	Wikify
4		Anders Rasmussen (talk)	Wikify
4		Sebastian Kudas (talk)	Orphan
7		Maciej Klich (talk)	Orphan
4		Victoria Janashvili (talk)	Orphan
6		Cillian de Gascun (talk)	Stub
4		Marian Bell (economist) (talk)	Stub
41		Batteries in space (talk)	Stub
5		Richard W. Sears (talk)	Stub
230		Russell Fry (politician) (talk)	Stub
123		Phagu Chauhan (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhinav1976. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Devaksh Rai, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 18:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Tellychakkar and ntv4u are unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Celpox is a junk scraper site. Times of India is not reliable for biographies per WP:ICTFSOURCES. The Patrika News piece is very brief. bollywoodkibaten explicitly states that they do not do any fact checks. In addition, the pieces in ToI, Patrika, and Bollywood Kibaten are primary sources as they merely report his own words.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devaksh Rai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alaukik Rahi - Wikipedia only 1 reliable, Source and reference of this article.

Even after having 1 reference and resource, how is their article. please help me. Abhinav1976 (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhinav1976! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 12:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Abhinav1976, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abhinav1976|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 12:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

its not paid article and i know him only by his profession. Devaksh Rai is an Indian Actor. and public figure too. that why Abhinav1976 (talk) 12:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

I am not persuaded that Rao passes WP:NACTOR. Persuade me by your work in this draft

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devaksh Rai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Devaksh Rai. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources still don't show notability. knowyourfilms.com is a database, and the ghatak reporter source just reports his own words. Please see this guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devaksh Rai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 10:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Singh Rajput This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. kindly accept for improve and request to edit and improve volunteers Abhinav1976 (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devaksh Rai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devaksh Rai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Singh Rajput this article have only 3 reference. how is it eligible. kindly

kindly do not delete it. I will improve it. Abhinav1976 (talk) 16:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Devaksh Rai. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not add sources that have already been removed; Tellychakkar, iwmbuzz and Times of India are not reliable sources in biographies. bonadea contributions talk 18:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I request to help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic. Abhinav1976 (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Devakshrai per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Devakshrai. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 09:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]