User talk:Adimovk5

User:Goodshoped35110s/Welcome To Wikipedia! -Goodshop 04:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The section is as follows

In an ancient greek text titled the Charition mime(200 B.C.) which contains a play about greek sailors and their adventures in coastal parts of what is present day Indian state of karnataka,the Indian characters are seen speaking a language diffrent from greek.many scholars tried to identify the language.Noted German Indologist Dr. E.Hultzsch claimed that it was some ancient dravidian language that was spoken in those times.Studies conducted by Indian linguist like P.S.Rai^[1] identified the language as Tulu.This finding was also affirmed by Central Institute of Indian Languages^[2] as also Edith Hall,A research professor at University of London^[3]. Also the Halmidi inscriptions makes mentions of the Tuluve people and their culture^[4].There is also a Tamil poem written during the Sangam age that makes mention of the tulu land and its people^[5].It also widely beleived that the Satyaputra kingdom mentioned in Ashokan edicts as one of the four kingdoms out of his rule is the Alva Kheda/Tulu Nadu region.^[6]Attagirl (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the category that you put in. Good job I didn't try to put one because I thought it was about snowboarding based on the one internal link. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your categories clean-up in the Lists of NGO in Vietnam and Thailand and related articles. Ans-mo 12:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Gangs in Virginia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Gangs in Virginia is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Gangs in Virginia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work at the big mess that is:Category:Surnames. Brewcrewer 22:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adimovk5 -- I've been working on Category:Organizations, eliminating redundancy. I've nominated a category you created (Category:Worker's NGOs) for merger with a larger more comprehensive category (Category:Labor organizations) as part of the Organizations cleanup; discussion is at 12/4 CFD; feel free to join the discussion & share your thoughts. Also I'm working through the NGOs, non-profit organizations, and charities tree; so if you have other ideas or work, your contributions would be greatly appreciated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations where those of us who do work on organizations are collaborating to bring some sense & clarity to the whole thing. Cheers, --Lquilter 00:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm going to be merging a lot of these NGOs categories (maybe all or most of them) with the relevant longer-standing and more built-out subject trees. For instance, Category:Science NGOs with Category:Scientific organizations. Hopefully we will then be able to merge the "NGOs" tree generally into "organizations"; organizations are primarily NGOs, and governmental organizations will be their own tree. Hope this makes sense. --Lquilter 01:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if any of these are on your watchlist, but it has been proposed that Super Duper Tuesday and Mini-Tuesday be merged into Super Tuesday. --Kralizec! (talk) 03:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input - a great website. I must ask though, under 'clown' why is the so titled Rebel Clown Army listed? This is a group dedicated to oppose government policy miss-using clown make up (and the title!) and has nothing to do with clowning whatsoever. --User:Tom (slapstick) sandow (talk) 12:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for creating the description for the "Non-governmental organizations by region" Category, but a style error you made by placing a space in front of the beginning of each sentence meant it came out

like this 

I've corrected it, and its nice to another wikignome like myself who fixes up small things, but i just thought i'd pass that on as something to keep in mind for future edits. thanks! Ironholds (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

We need your help: Filemon, a Warsaw-based Neocon activist wants to delete the Wikipedia entry on The Canadian European Council.

It defies logic how a lone amateur Polish contributor with little knowledge of Canada can single-handedly decide to delete a small (yet real and relatively influential) Canadian think-tank.

The Canadian European Council is a real/legitimate think-tank- these guys have published several pieces (some referenced in the Wikipedia entry) in:

- The San Francisco Chronicle: one of the top 5 US newspapers - The Daily Star: the Middle-East’s leading English language newspaper

They’re amongst twelve (only!) Canadian political think-tanks listed in Wikipedia …

Granted they’re not a very large/active organization, but that doesn’t constitute in itself a valid reason for removal.

I suspect Filemon’s desire to remove them stems from his overt dislike of their anti-neocon stance… I hope I’m wrong!

Anyways, I think this entry must be kept: it’s clear, well –written, concise and abides fully by Wikpidedia guidelines.

Please help us in countering Filemon’s abuse.

Cordially,

Moorehaus (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 12:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]  

You have caused a "warning" to appear above the "info Box" in this article when you removed continent info.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adimovk5 - I've taken {{Parthian empire-stub}} straight to WP:SFD - it's not really a stub template at all. Well, it is and it isn't - it's trying to be one, but only by adding one line about being a stub to a widely-used infobox. It certainly isn't anything like what stub templates should be like. Grutness...wha? 23:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I got the note about the Parthian Empire-stub also. I don't know what it means, are you wanting to delete it? If so, why? What needs to be done to it? Thank you in advance, Thomas Lessman (talk) 04:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames by culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 11:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Non-governmental organizations by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 12:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medical virtual communities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames by culture has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]